nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions is a research topic within Atmospheric Science. Science Explorer counts 43k research works in it since 1950. 16.2% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the phenomena of ice nucleation and melting, particularly in relation to nanoparticles, molecular dynamics simulations, surface energy, and size dependence. It explores topics such as homogeneous nucleation, crystal growth, and phase diagrams of water models.
- Ice Nucleation
- Melting
- Nanoparticles
- Molecular Dynamics Simulation
- Surface Energy
- Size Dependence
- Crystal Growth
- Homogeneous Nucleation
- Phase Diagrams
- Water Models
- Research works
- 43k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 6.9k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 16.2% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- -6% the tick is no change
Which countries lead nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions research?
By volume, China and the United States publish the most (810 and 464 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 China 810 works
- 2 United States 464 works
- 3 Russia 395 works
- 4 Germany 170 works
- 5 Japan 167 works
- 6 India 149 works
- 7 France 145 works
- 8 United Kingdom 110 works
- 9 Italy 60 works
- 10 South Korea 57 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Xi'an Jiaotong University publishes the most nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions research, followed by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Chinese Academy of Sciences.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityChina 24 works
- 2 Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFrance 22 works
- 3 Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 21 works
- 4 Tsinghua UniversityChina 20 works
- 5 Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityChina 19 works
- 6 Ural Federal UniversityRussia 19 works
- 7 Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityChina 18 works
- 8 Tianjin UniversityChina 17 works
- 9 University of Science and Technology BeijingChina 17 works
- 10 Joint Institute for High TemperaturesRussia 16 works
Who are the leading researchers in nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions?
The most-cited researchers publishing on nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions include Georg Kresse, Zhong Lin Wang and J. Häfner.
- 1 Georg Kresse Austria 24k citations
- 2 Zhong Lin Wang United States 11k citations
- 3 J. Häfner Austria 11k citations
- 4 John P. Perdew United States 9.9k citations
- 5 Jens K. Nørskov Denmark 9.8k citations
- 6 Kenji Watanabe Japan 6.4k citations
- 7 Takashi Taniguchi Japan 6.2k citations
- 8 Michele Parrinello Switzerland 5.6k citations
- 9 H. Eugene Stanley United States 5.5k citations
- 10 David J. Singh United States 5.1k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions research done?
The largest centres of nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Moscow (Russia), Shanghai (China) and Xi'an (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Yekaterinburg and Novosibirsk.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 Beijing China 168 works
- 2 Moscow Russia 137 works
- 3 Shanghai China 62 works
- 4 Xi'an China 57 works
- 5 Paris France 42 works
- 6 Saint Petersburg Russia 42 works
- 7 Tokyo Japan 40 works
- 8 Novosibirsk Russia 38 works
- 9 Yekaterinburg Russia 38 works
- 10 Nanjing China 32 works
Where it is the local speciality
- YekaterinburgRU · 38.0 works13×
- NovosibirskRU · 38.2 works9.9×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions than the world average.
Where is the best place to study nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions?
Among universities, judged by research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Ural Federal University and China University of Petroleum, East China score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityChina | 62.1 | 29.8% | 4.7× | 24 | +32.8% |
| 2 | Ural Federal UniversityRussia | 59.4 | 5.8% | 20.4× | 19 | +127.9% |
| 3 | China University of Petroleum, East ChinaChina | 54.9 | 32.3% | 6.7× | 10 | — |
| 4 | Tver State UniversityRussia | 51.6 | 12.0% | 159.7× | 12 | +112.4% |
| 5 | Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityChina | 51.2 | 34.4% | 2.5× | 18 | -20.1% |
| 6 | Tianjin UniversityChina | 49.9 | 24.1% | 4.6× | 18 | +10.7% |
| 7 | Hokkaido UniversityJapan | 49.5 | 15.5% | 9.0× | 12 | +1.1% |
| 8 | North China Electric Power UniversityChina | 45.3 | 24.4% | 5.0× | 11 | +87.1% |
| 9 | University of Science and Technology BeijingChina | 45.0 | 13.6% | 6.7× | 17 | +1.9% |
| 10 | Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityChina | 44.9 | 17.4% | 5.2× | 19 | -27.0% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 6% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2007.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.