Croatia vs Lithuania
On research quality in 2022-now, Croatia ranks #52 in the world and Lithuania #73, of 189 countries. Croatia stands higher in 20 of the 23 fields both publish in, Lithuania in 3.
Research profiles alike: 0.73very similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Croatia
- World rank, 2022-now
- #52
- #59 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 38k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 6.5%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 61%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Industrial relations, Library and Information Sciences, Space and Planetary Science.
Lithuania
- World rank, 2022-now
- #73
- #71 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 20k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 8.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 65%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Energy, Language and Linguistics, Algebra and Number Theory.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Lithuania leads on 5 of 9 measures: top-10% rate, citations per work, open access, international co-authorship and growth. Croatia leads on 3 of 9 measures: research quality, excellence for its fields and output. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #52Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#73
- 0.76×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.71×
- 38kOutputfractional works, 2022-now20k
- 6.5%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited8.4%
- 8.2Citations per workall time, per fractional work8.7
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 61%Open accessof its works free to read, all time65%
- 16%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time18%
- +2%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+6%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Croatia stands higher in 20 of 23 fields, Lithuania in 3. Croatia leads most in Earth and Planetary Sciences (#48 against #71); Lithuania leads most in Neuroscience (#50 against #53). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #54Agricultural and Biological Sciences#63
- #51Arts and Humanities#63
- #51Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#47
- #47Business, Management and Accounting#62
- #47Chemistry#64
- #61Computer Science#65
- #49Decision Sciences#59
- #38Dentistry-
- #48Earth and Planetary Sciences#71
- #48Economics, Econometrics and Finance#64
- #45Energy-
- #56Engineering#62
- #62Environmental Science#70
- #65Health Professions#63
- #43Immunology and Microbiology-
- #49Materials Science#56
- #53Mathematics#72
- #54Medicine#83
- #53Neuroscience#50
- #43Nursing-
- #44Physics and Astronomy#60
- #52Psychology#55
- #69Social Sciences#77
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Croatia rank | Lithuania rank | Croatia top 10% | Lithuania top 10% | Croatia works | Lithuania works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #54 | #63 | 9.1% | 12.2% | 1.8k | 1.1k |
| Arts and Humanities | #51 | #63 | 4.9% | 8.7% | 2.4k | 1.2k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #51 | #47 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 1.5k | 796 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #47 | #62 | 8.5% | 10.4% | 1.3k | 996 |
| Chemistry | #47 | #64 | 6.3% | 8.9% | 490 | 222 |
| Computer Science | #61 | #65 | 7.8% | 9.0% | 2.2k | 1.1k |
| Decision Sciences | #49 | #59 | 8.2% | 11.8% | 374 | 207 |
| Dentistry | #38 | - | 12.7% | - | 294 | - |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #48 | #71 | 5.8% | 5.6% | 646 | 240 |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #48 | #64 | 5.5% | 10.1% | 2.4k | 683 |
| Energy | #45 | - | 8.1% | - | 229 | - |
| Engineering | #56 | #62 | 6.2% | 7.2% | 4.3k | 2.7k |
| Environmental Science | #62 | #70 | 5.9% | 8.6% | 2.2k | 1.1k |
| Health Professions | #65 | #63 | 5.9% | 8.3% | 882 | 479 |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #43 | - | 7.9% | - | 314 | - |
| Materials Science | #49 | #56 | 5.4% | 6.5% | 691 | 622 |
| Mathematics | #53 | #72 | 5.2% | 5.7% | 443 | 250 |
| Medicine | #54 | #83 | 7.2% | 7.3% | 7.3k | 2.9k |
| Neuroscience | #53 | #50 | 5.7% | 7.9% | 473 | 255 |
| Nursing | #43 | - | 6.6% | - | 217 | - |
| Physics and Astronomy | #44 | #60 | 7.0% | 6.3% | 518 | 359 |
| Psychology | #52 | #55 | 5.5% | 8.6% | 1.5k | 850 |
| Social Sciences | #69 | #77 | 5.5% | 8.0% | 5.8k | 3.6k |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Croatia
- Youth Subcultures
- Cultural Integration
- Spirituality
- Integrated Management
- Water Resources Management
- Hydrological Analysis
- Environmental Policy
- Resilience
- Leadership Emergence
- Agricultural Sustainability
- Innovation Management
- Financial Performance
- Regional Development
- Religion
- Commercial Diplomacy
- Sovereign Debt Crises
- Nation-Building
- International Relations
- Climate Change
- Sustainable Development
- Epidemiology
- Sustainability
- Economic Growth
- International Trade
- Foreign Policy
- Negotiation
- Economic Diplomacy
- Artificial Intelligence
- Organizational Culture
- Ethics
- Small and Medium Enterprises
- Rural Tourism
- Identity
- Climate Change Impact
- Water Quality Monitoring
- Socio-economic Factors
- Global Water Resources
- Media
- Social Change
- Communication Technology
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology1,625◆ 0.95×139 topics
- Sustainable Development1,368▲ 2.0×105 topics
- Sustainability1,296▲ 1.23×127 topics
- Climate Change1,230◆ 1.05×124 topics
- Economic Growth1,129▲ 3.2×35 topics
- International Relations1,106▲ 11×28 topics
- International Trade1,024▲ 17×12 topics
- Nation-Building1,018▲ 45×4 topics
- Foreign Policy1,008▲ 62×4 topics
- Sovereign Debt Crises1,002▲ 58×2 topics
- Negotiation992▲ 65×4 topics
- Commercial Diplomacy976▲ 193×1 topic
- Economic Diplomacy976▲ 193×1 topic
- Religion893▲ 4.5×43 topics
- Artificial Intelligence889▲ 1.45×62 topics
- Regional Development810▲ 5.5×19 topics
- Organizational Culture800▲ 4.8×16 topics
- Financial Performance799▲ 3.3×16 topics
- Ethics774▲ 3.6×58 topics
- Innovation Management742▲ 11×9 topics
- Small and Medium Enterprises722▲ 9.5×10 topics
- Agricultural Sustainability716▲ 15×6 topics
- Rural Tourism696▲ 52×3 topics
- Leadership Emergence693▲ 117×1 topic
- Identity680▲ 2.2×75 topics
- Resilience629▲ 3.0×17 topics
- Climate Change Impact621▲ 6.3×8 topics
- Environmental Policy580▲ 6.7×14 topics
- Water Quality Monitoring549▲ 16×3 topics
- Hydrological Analysis530▲ 34×2 topics
- Socio-economic Factors524▲ 11×3 topics
- Water Resources Management523▲ 92×2 topics
- Global Water Resources517▲ 127×1 topic
- Integrated Management517▲ 127×1 topic
- Media478▲ 7.4×18 topics
- Spirituality468▲ 11×7 topics
- Social Change455▲ 8.6×19 topics
- Cultural Integration449▲ 4.9×3 topics
- Communication Technology422▲ 79×1 topic
- Youth Subcultures422▲ 79×1 topic
Lithuania
- National Stereotypes
- Social Perception
- Australia
- Cold War
- Eastern Europe
- Social Competence
- Soviet Union
- Entrepreneurship
- Ethics
- International Relations
- Identity
- Economic Growth
- Energy Efficiency
- Higher Education
- Artificial Intelligence
- Innovation
- Human Rights
- Sustainable Development
- Education
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Epidemiology
- Globalization
- Environmental Impact
- Renewable Energy
- Mental Health
- Pedagogy
- Leadership
- Environmental Management
- European Union
- Literature
- Learning
- Professional Identity
- Digital Competence
- Feminist Research
- European Integration
- Diplomacy
- Postcolonial Theory
- Rhetoric
- Imagology
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability824▲ 1.45×121 topics
- Climate Change727◆ 1.15×118 topics
- Epidemiology724▼ 0.78×135 topics
- Education679▲ 1.70×124 topics
- Globalization673▲ 1.47×156 topics
- Sustainable Development616▲ 1.70×98 topics
- Environmental Impact523▲ 1.32×70 topics
- Human Rights478▲ 2.0×81 topics
- Renewable Energy472▲ 1.40×55 topics
- Innovation454▲ 1.89×74 topics
- Mental Health415▲ 1.25×46 topics
- Artificial Intelligence405▲ 1.22×63 topics
- Pedagogy400▲ 3.4×30 topics
- Higher Education392▲ 3.2×32 topics
- Leadership360▲ 3.2×35 topics
- Energy Efficiency334▲ 1.56×43 topics
- Environmental Management326▲ 3.5×19 topics
- Economic Growth325▲ 1.72×34 topics
- European Union302▲ 5.8×27 topics
- Identity292▲ 1.73×72 topics
- Literature263▲ 2.1×51 topics
- International Relations262▲ 4.7×28 topics
- Learning248▲ 3.6×14 topics
- Ethics247▲ 2.1×50 topics
- Professional Identity240▲ 12×5 topics
- Entrepreneurship232▲ 2.5×22 topics
- Digital Competence226▲ 11×3 topics
- Soviet Union217▲ 17×3 topics
- Feminist Research215▲ 165×1 topic
- Social Competence215▲ 165×1 topic
- European Integration209▲ 16×6 topics
- Eastern Europe202▲ 17×3 topics
- Diplomacy177▲ 8.2×8 topics
- Cold War168▲ 12×5 topics
- Postcolonial Theory156▲ 26×4 topics
- Australia155▲ 42×1 topic
- Rhetoric151▲ 6.4×6 topics
- Social Perception142▲ 15×5 topics
- Imagology132▲ 57×1 topic
- National Stereotypes132▲ 57×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Croatia has out-published Lithuania every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5000
- 0In the top 1,0000
- #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Croatia or Lithuania?
Croatia publishes 1.9× as much research as Lithuania in 2022-now (38k against 20k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Croatia or Lithuania?
8.4% of Lithuania's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 6.5% for Croatia.
Is Croatia or Lithuania growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +6% against 2018-21 for Lithuania, and +2% for Croatia.
Which has more open access research, Croatia or Lithuania?
65% of Lithuania's research is free to read, against 61% of Croatia's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Croatia or Lithuania?
Croatia holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Lithuania 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 0.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Croatia
- 1University of Zagreb6.5% top 10% · 14k works
- 2University of Split8.1% top 10% · 3.2k works
- 3University of Osijek7.3% top 10% · 2.8k works
- 4University of Rijeka7.2% top 10% · 3k works
- 5University North9.0% top 10% · 597 works
- 6Institut za filozofiju3.7% top 10% · 1.5k works
Lithuania
- 1Vytautas Magnus University9.8% top 10% · 1.7k works
- 2Vilnius University7.0% top 10% · 5.1k works
- 3Kaunas University of Technology11.3% top 10% · 2.1k works
- 4Vilnius Gediminas Technical University9.2% top 10% · 2.1k works
- 5Mykolas Romeris University8.3% top 10% · 635 works
- 6Klaipėda University7.7% top 10% · 550 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Croatia
- 1 D. Mekterović #10,978 worldwide 52k citations · 552 works
- 2 Ozren Polašek #21,112 worldwide 75k citations · 684 works
- 3 R. Gupta #26,416 worldwide 7.7k citations · 106 works
- 4 G. I. Veres #32,507 worldwide 16k citations · 246 works
- 5 T. Virdee #36,724 worldwide 11k citations · 145 works
Lithuania
- 1 Morteza Ghobakhloo #2,585 worldwide 15k citations · 136 works
- 2 Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas #8,332 worldwide 56k citations · 838 works
- 3 Dalia Štreimikienė #21,194 worldwide 25k citations · 825 works
- 4 Jelena Čelutkienė #36,225 worldwide 49k citations · 275 works
- 5 Tomas Baležentis #51,809 worldwide 12k citations · 422 works