Lithuania vs Moldova
On research quality in 2022-now, Lithuania ranks #73 in the world and Moldova #159, of 189 countries. Lithuania stands higher in 19 of the 19 fields both publish in, Moldova in 0.
Research profiles alike: 0.75very similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Lithuania
- World rank, 2022-now
- #73
- #71 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 20k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 8.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 65%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Energy, Language and Linguistics, Algebra and Number Theory.
Moldova
- World rank, 2022-now
- #159
- #170 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 7.3k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 2.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 79%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Energy, Anatomy, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Lithuania leads on 5 of 9 measures: research quality, excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate and citations per work. Moldova leads on 3 of 9 measures: open access, international co-authorship and growth. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #73Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#159
- 0.71×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.33×
- 20kOutputfractional works, 2022-now7.3k
- 8.4%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited2.6%
- 8.7Citations per workall time, per fractional work4.2
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 65%Open accessof its works free to read, all time79%
- 18%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time24%
- +6%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+29%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Lithuania stands higher in 19 of 19 fields, Moldova in 0. Lithuania leads most in Engineering (#62 against #126). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #63Agricultural and Biological Sciences#112
- #63Arts and Humanities#96
- #47Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-
- #62Business, Management and Accounting#106
- #64Chemistry-
- #65Computer Science#123
- #59Decision Sciences-
- #71Earth and Planetary Sciences-
- #64Economics, Econometrics and Finance#105
- #62Engineering#126
- #70Environmental Science#108
- #63Health Professions#98
- #56Materials Science#84
- #72Mathematics-
- #83Medicine#142
- #50Neuroscience-
- #60Physics and Astronomy-
- #55Psychology#104
- #77Social Sciences#142
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Lithuania rank | Moldova rank | Lithuania top 10% | Moldova top 10% | Lithuania works | Moldova works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #63 | #112 | 12.2% | 3.3% | 1.1k | 423 |
| Arts and Humanities | #63 | #96 | 8.7% | 3.5% | 1.2k | 343 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #47 | - | 8.2% | - | 796 | - |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #62 | #106 | 10.4% | 1.6% | 996 | 350 |
| Chemistry | #64 | - | 8.9% | - | 222 | - |
| Computer Science | #65 | #123 | 9.0% | 2.8% | 1.1k | 478 |
| Decision Sciences | #59 | - | 11.8% | - | 207 | - |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #71 | - | 5.6% | - | 240 | - |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #64 | #105 | 10.1% | 1.6% | 683 | 405 |
| Engineering | #62 | #126 | 7.2% | 2.2% | 2.7k | 578 |
| Environmental Science | #70 | #108 | 8.6% | 3.0% | 1.1k | 345 |
| Health Professions | #63 | #98 | 8.3% | 2.7% | 479 | 257 |
| Materials Science | #56 | #84 | 6.5% | 1.8% | 622 | 204 |
| Mathematics | #72 | - | 5.7% | - | 250 | - |
| Medicine | #83 | #142 | 7.3% | 2.2% | 2.9k | 1.2k |
| Neuroscience | #50 | - | 7.9% | - | 255 | - |
| Physics and Astronomy | #60 | - | 6.3% | - | 359 | - |
| Psychology | #55 | #104 | 8.6% | 1.8% | 850 | 303 |
| Social Sciences | #77 | #142 | 8.0% | 3.2% | 3.6k | 1.6k |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Lithuania
- National Stereotypes
- Social Perception
- Australia
- Cold War
- Eastern Europe
- Social Competence
- Soviet Union
- Entrepreneurship
- Ethics
- International Relations
- Identity
- Economic Growth
- Energy Efficiency
- Higher Education
- Artificial Intelligence
- Innovation
- Human Rights
- Sustainable Development
- Education
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Epidemiology
- Globalization
- Environmental Impact
- Renewable Energy
- Mental Health
- Pedagogy
- Leadership
- Environmental Management
- European Union
- Literature
- Learning
- Professional Identity
- Digital Competence
- Feminist Research
- European Integration
- Diplomacy
- Postcolonial Theory
- Rhetoric
- Imagology
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability824▲ 1.45×121 topics
- Climate Change727◆ 1.15×118 topics
- Epidemiology724▼ 0.78×135 topics
- Education679▲ 1.70×124 topics
- Globalization673▲ 1.47×156 topics
- Sustainable Development616▲ 1.70×98 topics
- Environmental Impact523▲ 1.32×70 topics
- Human Rights478▲ 2.0×81 topics
- Renewable Energy472▲ 1.40×55 topics
- Innovation454▲ 1.89×74 topics
- Mental Health415▲ 1.25×46 topics
- Artificial Intelligence405▲ 1.22×63 topics
- Pedagogy400▲ 3.4×30 topics
- Higher Education392▲ 3.2×32 topics
- Leadership360▲ 3.2×35 topics
- Energy Efficiency334▲ 1.56×43 topics
- Environmental Management326▲ 3.5×19 topics
- Economic Growth325▲ 1.72×34 topics
- European Union302▲ 5.8×27 topics
- Identity292▲ 1.73×72 topics
- Literature263▲ 2.1×51 topics
- International Relations262▲ 4.7×28 topics
- Learning248▲ 3.6×14 topics
- Ethics247▲ 2.1×50 topics
- Professional Identity240▲ 12×5 topics
- Entrepreneurship232▲ 2.5×22 topics
- Digital Competence226▲ 11×3 topics
- Soviet Union217▲ 17×3 topics
- Feminist Research215▲ 165×1 topic
- Social Competence215▲ 165×1 topic
- European Integration209▲ 16×6 topics
- Eastern Europe202▲ 17×3 topics
- Diplomacy177▲ 8.2×8 topics
- Cold War168▲ 12×5 topics
- Postcolonial Theory156▲ 26×4 topics
- Australia155▲ 42×1 topic
- Rhetoric151▲ 6.4×6 topics
- Social Perception142▲ 15×5 topics
- Imagology132▲ 57×1 topic
- National Stereotypes132▲ 57×1 topic
Moldova
- European Legal Systems
- Constitutionalism
- Fitness Technology
- Motor Skills Development
- Financial Security
- Physical Education
- Judicial Review
- Global Governance
- Health Promotion
- Regional Development
- Environmental Management
- Higher Education
- E-Learning
- Mental Health
- Renewable Energy
- Educational Technology
- Sustainability
- Innovation
- Human Rights
- Globalization
- Sustainable Development
- Education
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Economic Development
- Pedagogy
- Digital Transformation
- Teacher Training
- Leadership
- International Law
- Digital Economy
- European Union
- Legal Regulation
- Athletic Training
- Digitalization
- Economic Security
- Biomechanical Analysis
- Sports Science
- ECHR
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainable Development524▲ 3.9×87 topics
- Globalization458▲ 2.7×111 topics
- Education415▲ 2.8×116 topics
- Human Rights413▲ 4.7×69 topics
- Climate Change381▲ 1.64×108 topics
- Innovation361▲ 4.1×71 topics
- Epidemiology318◆ 0.93×126 topics
- Sustainability308▲ 1.47×100 topics
- Artificial Intelligence277▲ 2.3×55 topics
- Educational Technology249▲ 2.5×44 topics
- Economic Development237▲ 3.5×34 topics
- Renewable Energy220▲ 1.78×55 topics
- Pedagogy210▲ 4.9×26 topics
- Mental Health205▲ 1.68×40 topics
- Digital Transformation185▲ 4.0×28 topics
- E-Learning185▲ 2.2×24 topics
- Teacher Training171▲ 3.3×27 topics
- Higher Education159▲ 3.5×26 topics
- Leadership154▲ 3.7×31 topics
- Environmental Management153▲ 4.4×19 topics
- International Law139▲ 5.2×29 topics
- Regional Development135▲ 4.6×16 topics
- Digital Economy130▲ 7.6×19 topics
- Health Promotion126▲ 4.7×12 topics
- European Union125▲ 6.5×23 topics
- Global Governance119▲ 5.8×21 topics
- Legal Regulation116▲ 6.0×8 topics
- Judicial Review112▲ 15×6 topics
- Athletic Training110▲ 14×3 topics
- Physical Education109▲ 10×7 topics
- Digitalization108▲ 6.1×9 topics
- Financial Security105▲ 12×3 topics
- Economic Security102▲ 5.6×7 topics
- Motor Skills Development94▲ 12×2 topics
- Biomechanical Analysis93▲ 17×2 topics
- Fitness Technology92▲ 46×1 topic
- Sports Science92▲ 46×1 topic
- Constitutionalism91▲ 12×4 topics
- ECHR87▲ 29×1 topic
- European Legal Systems87▲ 29×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Lithuania has out-published Moldova every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5000
- 0In the top 1,0000
- #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Lithuania or Moldova?
Lithuania publishes 2.8× as much research as Moldova in 2022-now (20k against 7.3k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Lithuania or Moldova?
8.4% of Lithuania's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 2.6% for Moldova.
Is Lithuania or Moldova growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +29% against 2018-21 for Moldova, and +6% for Lithuania.
Which has more open access research, Lithuania or Moldova?
79% of Moldova's research is free to read, against 65% of Lithuania's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Lithuania or Moldova?
Lithuania holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Moldova 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 0.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Lithuania
- 1Vytautas Magnus University9.8% top 10% · 1.7k works
- 2Vilnius University7.0% top 10% · 5.1k works
- 3Kaunas University of Technology11.3% top 10% · 2.1k works
- 4Vilnius Gediminas Technical University9.2% top 10% · 2.1k works
- 5Mykolas Romeris University8.3% top 10% · 635 works
- 6Klaipėda University7.7% top 10% · 550 works
Moldova
- 1Moldova State University1.6% top 10% · 1.5k works
- 2Technical University of Moldova3.1% top 10% · 928 works
- 3Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science5.5% top 10% · 320 works
- 4State University of Physical Education and Sport3.4% top 10% · 386 works
- 5Institute of Educational Sciences8.2% top 10% · 216 works
- 6Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova1.8% top 10% · 672 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Lithuania
- 1 Morteza Ghobakhloo #2,585 worldwide 15k citations · 136 works
- 2 Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas #8,332 worldwide 56k citations · 838 works
- 3 Dalia Štreimikienė #21,194 worldwide 25k citations · 825 works
- 4 Jelena Čelutkienė #36,225 worldwide 49k citations · 275 works
- 5 Tomas Baležentis #51,809 worldwide 12k citations · 422 works
Moldova
- 1 Valeriu Crudu #140,526 worldwide 4.5k citations · 157 works
- 2 Denis L. Nika #196,481 worldwide 9.6k citations · 101 works
- 3 Dumitru Chesov #439,970 worldwide 1.8k citations · 83 works
- 4 Oleg I. Lupan #601,694 worldwide 14k citations · 252 works
- 5 Eleonora Vataman #611,941 worldwide 11k citations · 37 works