Chongqing University vs Inserm
On research quality in 2022-now, Inserm ranks #74 in the world and Chongqing University #75, of 22,385 institutions. Chongqing University stands higher in 8 of the 15 fields both publish in, Inserm in 7.
Research profiles alike: -0.57different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other institutions
Chongqing University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #75
- #88 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 25k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 15.7%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 24%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Mechanics of Materials, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering.
Inserm
- World rank, 2022-now
- #74
- #76 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 26k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 12.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 39%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Transplantation, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Developmental Neuroscience.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Inserm leads on 5 of 8 measures: research quality, output, citations per work, open access and international co-authorship. Chongqing University leads on 2 of 8 measures: top-10% rate and growth. The two are level on citation excellence for its fields.
- #75Research qualityworld rank of 22,385 institutions, 2022-now#74
- 1.36×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.34×
- 25kOutputfractional works, 2022-now26k
- 15.7%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited12.4%
- 15.1Citations per workall time, per fractional work35.0
- 24%Open accessof its works free to read, all time39%
- 13%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time29%
- +52%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change-9%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Chongqing University stands higher in 8 of 15 fields, Inserm in 7. Inserm leads most in Medicine (#10 against #290). Each bar is that side's standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- -Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#47
- #43Business, Management and Accounting-
- #33Chemistry-
- #61Computer Science-
- #57Economics, Econometrics and Finance-
- #22Energy-
- #8Engineering-
- #22Environmental Science-
- -Health Professions#37
- -Immunology and Microbiology#9
- #33Materials Science-
- #290Medicine#10
- -Neuroscience#25
- -Psychology#82
- -Social Sciences#187
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Chongqing University rank | Inserm rank | Chongqing University top 10% | Inserm top 10% | Chongqing University works | Inserm works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | - | #47 | - | 10.9% | - | 3.2k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #43 | - | 20.7% | - | 361 | - |
| Chemistry | #33 | - | 14.1% | - | 464 | - |
| Computer Science | #61 | - | 14.1% | - | 2k | - |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #57 | - | 20.9% | - | 314 | - |
| Energy | #22 | - | 11.9% | - | 552 | - |
| Engineering | #8 | - | 16.5% | - | 11k | - |
| Environmental Science | #22 | - | 17.1% | - | 1.3k | - |
| Health Professions | - | #37 | - | 12.2% | - | 998 |
| Immunology and Microbiology | - | #9 | - | 12.5% | - | 927 |
| Materials Science | #33 | - | 14.3% | - | 2.1k | - |
| Medicine | #290 | #10 | 16.7% | 13.9% | 1.1k | 12k |
| Neuroscience | - | #25 | - | 11.2% | - | 1.3k |
| Psychology | - | #82 | - | 11.7% | - | 816 |
| Social Sciences | - | #187 | - | 10.9% | - | 888 |
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world's share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Energy2.7× 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering2.6× 0.1×
- Engineering3.2× 0.2×
- Materials Science2.6× 0.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.8× 0.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.5× 0.1×
- Computer Science1.1× 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy1.2× 0.3×
- Environmental Science1.2× 0.4×
- Chemistry1.3× 0.4×
- Decision Sciences0.9× 0.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.6× 0.3×
- Mathematics0.6× 0.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.2× 0.3×
- Social Sciences0.2× 0.3×
- Arts and Humanities0.1× 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.6× 2.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.4× 1.7×
- Psychology0.2× 1.1×
- Dentistry0.2× 1.0×
- Nursing0.2× 1.3×
- Neuroscience0.5× 3.5×
- Health Professions0.2× 1.6×
- Medicine0.3× 2.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.4× 4.0×
- Veterinary0.1× 1.5×
Location quotient in 2022-now: the share of each side's research in the field over the world's share. 1× is the world's balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Chongqing University leans further are at the top, Inserm's at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Chongqing University
- Fracture
- Surface Roughness
- Microstructural Evolution
- Microstructure Evolution
- Wavelet Transform
- CO2 Sequestration
- Finite Element Analysis
- Rechargeable Batteries
- Renewable Energy Integration
- Carbon Nanotubes
- Thermal Management
- Nonlinear Dynamics
- Cathode Materials
- Vibration Analysis
- Energy Efficiency
- Graphene
- Energy Storage
- Nanoparticles
- Neural Networks
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
- Mechanical Properties
- Renewable Energy
- Nanomaterials
- Microstructure
- Environmental Impact
- Nanocomposites
- Biomedical Applications
- Lithium-ion Batteries
- Metal-Organic Frameworks
- Power Electronics
- Electric Vehicles
- Numerical Simulation
- Battery Technology
- Model Predictive Control
- Dynamic Behavior
- Implantable Devices
- Rock Mechanics
- Corrosion Resistance
- Grain Refinement
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Deep Learning1,567▲ 1.80×84 topics
- Machine Learning1,072▲ 1.27×91 topics
- Mechanical Properties1,062▲ 4.3×39 topics
- Neural Networks873▲ 2.2×38 topics
- Renewable Energy777▲ 2.1×48 topics
- Nanoparticles755▲ 2.4×44 topics
- Nanomaterials747▲ 2.8×20 topics
- Energy Storage700▲ 4.3×12 topics
- Microstructure643▲ 4.9×19 topics
- Graphene604▲ 3.5×12 topics
- Environmental Impact582▲ 1.35×56 topics
- Energy Efficiency568▲ 2.4×41 topics
- Nanocomposites553▲ 2.8×22 topics
- Vibration Analysis528▲ 7.8×8 topics
- Biomedical Applications486▲ 1.63×35 topics
- Cathode Materials423▲ 4.3×3 topics
- Lithium-ion Batteries405▲ 3.9×4 topics
- Nonlinear Dynamics400▲ 7.1×7 topics
- Metal-Organic Frameworks360▲ 3.4×6 topics
- Thermal Management356▲ 4.3×7 topics
- Power Electronics353▲ 4.3×8 topics
- Carbon Nanotubes347▲ 4.1×9 topics
- Electric Vehicles345▲ 4.7×5 topics
- Renewable Energy Integration317▲ 3.8×5 topics
- Numerical Simulation316▲ 4.3×14 topics
- Rechargeable Batteries310▲ 4.6×2 topics
- Battery Technology303▲ 4.3×3 topics
- Finite Element Analysis294▲ 5.1×9 topics
- Model Predictive Control278▲ 4.3×6 topics
- CO2 Sequestration272▲ 5.5×4 topics
- Dynamic Behavior270▲ 9.2×3 topics
- Wavelet Transform268▲ 4.6×7 topics
- Implantable Devices259▲ 19×2 topics
- Microstructure Evolution257▲ 14×5 topics
- Rock Mechanics248▲ 10×4 topics
- Microstructural Evolution244▲ 6.7×4 topics
- Corrosion Resistance241▲ 14×4 topics
- Surface Roughness241▲ 7.1×4 topics
- Grain Refinement230▲ 7.9×4 topics
- Fracture226▲ 9.0×3 topics
Inserm
- Ethical Practices
- Healthcare Quality Indicators
- Social Determinants of Health
- Autoantibodies
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction
- Tumor Microenvironment
- Immunity
- Global Burden
- Pathogenesis
- Clinical Trials
- Chemotherapy
- Immune Response
- Biomarkers
- Immunotherapy
- Mental Health
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Diagnosis
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Treatment
- Inflammation
- Epidemiology
- Oxidative Stress
- Cancer
- Public Health
- Quality of Life
- Neurological Disorders
- Genetics
- Risk Factors
- Management
- Obesity
- Aging
- Genetic Mutations
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Heart Failure
- Insulin Resistance
- Prognostic Factors
- Innate Immunity
- Thrombosis
- Palliative Care
- Psychological Trauma
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology2,615▲ 2.5×140 topics
- Inflammation1,730▲ 3.1×83 topics
- Oxidative Stress956▲ 2.2×63 topics
- Treatment885▲ 2.8×52 topics
- Cancer836▲ 2.4×58 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease797▲ 2.6×39 topics
- Public Health784▲ 2.0×70 topics
- Diagnosis737▲ 3.0×41 topics
- Quality of Life721▲ 1.89×59 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome613▲ 2.9×24 topics
- Neurological Disorders608▲ 4.0×20 topics
- Mental Health584▲ 1.54×45 topics
- Genetics581▲ 3.1×27 topics
- Immunotherapy561▲ 2.9×19 topics
- Risk Factors543▲ 1.86×37 topics
- Biomarkers529▲ 2.9×18 topics
- Management521▲ 2.5×36 topics
- Immune Response499▲ 3.3×23 topics
- Obesity493▲ 2.4×28 topics
- Chemotherapy468▲ 2.5×25 topics
- Aging430▲ 3.0×19 topics
- Clinical Trials426▲ 2.4×19 topics
- Genetic Mutations424▲ 3.7×23 topics
- Pathogenesis414▲ 3.1×24 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines380▲ 2.6×14 topics
- Global Burden375▲ 2.6×12 topics
- Heart Failure366▲ 3.1×14 topics
- Immunity361▲ 3.4×11 topics
- Insulin Resistance359▲ 3.0×10 topics
- Tumor Microenvironment339▲ 2.8×8 topics
- Prognostic Factors333▲ 2.9×14 topics
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction321▲ 4.1×12 topics
- Innate Immunity307▲ 3.6×11 topics
- Autoantibodies296▲ 4.8×8 topics
- Thrombosis281▲ 3.8×7 topics
- Social Determinants of Health261▲ 4.6×7 topics
- Palliative Care239▲ 5.9×6 topics
- Healthcare Quality Indicators207▲ 14×2 topics
- Psychological Trauma202▲ 13×2 topics
- Ethical Practices202▲ 13×2 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Chongqing University has out-published Inserm every year since 2024, when it overtook it.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Which publishes more research, Chongqing University or Inserm?
Inserm publishes 1.0× as much research as Chongqing University in 2022-now (26k against 25k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Chongqing University or Inserm?
15.7% of Chongqing University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 12.4% for Inserm.
Is Chongqing University or Inserm growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +52% against 2018-21 for Chongqing University, and -9% for Inserm.
Which has more open access research, Chongqing University or Inserm?
39% of Inserm's research is free to read, against 24% of Chongqing University's.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Chongqing University
- 1 Hengyu Guo #1,080 worldwide 29k citations · 288 works
- 2 Zhigang Zang #5,978 worldwide 14k citations · 221 works
- 3 Quanle Zou #6,218 worldwide 7.9k citations · 186 works
- 4 Minda Ma #7,558 worldwide 5.6k citations · 89 works
- 5 Jiangzhao Chen #8,924 worldwide 15k citations · 213 works
Inserm
- 1 Lorenzo Galluzzi #480 worldwide 121k citations · 1,017 works
- 2 Pierre Chambon #1,058 worldwide 147k citations · 843 works
- 3 Sandrine Henri #1,472 worldwide 14k citations · 8,401 works
- 4 Marc Bajénoff #1,566 worldwide 9.5k citations · 8,368 works
- 5 Shen‐Ying Zhang #2,179 worldwide 25k citations · 223 works