Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
In research, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology stands highest in Medicine (#1,108 of 17,978 worldwide), Health Sciences (#1,384 of 20,462 worldwide) and Life Sciences (#1,565 of 14,347 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #3,198 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #809 of 8,685
- Research works
- 4.2k ▼ 40% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 283k 67.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 1.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 17% world 28%
What is Armed Forces Institute of Pathology known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MedicineField | #1,108 of 17,978 | 27.8% | 2,575 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #1,384 of 20,462 | 27.5% | 2,749 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #1,565 of 14,347 | 20.9% | 1,025 | |
| Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineSubfield | #358 of 2,717 | 30.0% | 326 | |
| SurgerySubfield | #656 of 4,227 | 30.6% | 354 | |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField | #1,525 of 7,814 | 21.2% | 611 | |
| EpidemiologySubfield | #514 of 2,519 | 30.7% | 210 | |
| RheumatologySubfield | #307 of 954 | 29.6% | 179 | |
| Molecular BiologySubfield | #1,950 of 4,961 | 18.7% | 319 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #9,306 of 21,541 | 22.1% | 268 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Armed Forces Institute of Pathology sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 7.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Veterinary 7.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 5.9×
- Medicine 3.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2.4×
- Nursing 2.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.5×
- Dentistry 1.4×
- Arts and Humanities 1.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.8×
- Neuroscience 0.7×
- Psychology 0.7×
- Health Professions 0.7×
- Chemistry 0.3×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Social Sciences 0.1×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Armed Forces Institute of Pathology?
Ranked on the composite score, Lorenz E. Zimmerman, Leslie H. Sobin and Andrew Farb lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.
- 1 Lorenz E. Zimmerman United States · #7,686 worldwide 594 citations · 63 works
- 2 Leslie H. Sobin United States · #11,160 worldwide 926 citations · 48 works
- 3 Andrew Farb United States · #11,934 worldwide 896 citations · 47 works
- 4 Timothy J. O’Leary United States · #18,698 worldwide 415 citations · 66 works
- 5 Kamal G. Ishak United States · #22,250 worldwide 1.4k citations · 37 works
- 6 Markku Miettinen United States · #33,677 worldwide 487 citations · 94 works
- 7 Elson B. Helwig United States · #33,971 worldwide 484 citations · 34 works
- 8 Franz M. Enzinger United States · #41,726 worldwide 980 citations · 30 works
- 9 Henry J. Norris United States · #52,988 worldwide 604 citations · 28 works
- 10 Ben S. Fine United States · #60,853 worldwide 256 citations · 29 works
Which keywords describe research at Armed Forces Institute of Pathology?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Prognostic Factors, Epidemiology, Chemotherapy, Genetic Mutations, Immunotherapy, Diagnosis, Radiotherapy and Surgical Management.
- Radiation
- Tumor Models
- Desmoid Tumor
- Breast Cancer
- Immunohistochemistry
- Genomic Instability
- Molecular Classification
- Survival Analysis
- Surgery
- Metastasis
- Biomarkers
- Ewing's Sarcoma
- Genomic Characterization
- Genomic Analysis
- Surgical Management
- Radiotherapy
- Oxidative Stress
- Immunotherapy
- Treatment
- Prognostic Factors
- Epidemiology
- Chemotherapy
- Diagnosis
- Genetic Mutations
- Inflammation
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Radiation Therapy
- Pathogenesis
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- Osteosarcoma
- Immune Response
- Clinical Trials
- Gene Expression
- Apoptosis
- Fibrosis
- PET Imaging
- Molecular Pathology
- Molecular Profiling
- Solitary Fibrous Tumor
- Bystander Effects
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology456▲ 2.7×120 topics
- Prognostic Factors318▲ 17×14 topics
- Chemotherapy270▲ 9.2×25 topics
- Treatment209▲ 3.9×45 topics
- Diagnosis209▲ 4.9×40 topics
- Immunotherapy190▲ 7.0×19 topics
- Genetic Mutations183▲ 8.4×23 topics
- Oxidative Stress174▲ 2.3×57 topics
- Inflammation168▲ 1.72×74 topics
- Radiotherapy168▲ 11×13 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines164▲ 7.1×12 topics
- Surgical Management157▲ 8.3×20 topics
- Radiation Therapy123▲ 20×6 topics
- Genomic Analysis115▲ 9.5×14 topics
- Pathogenesis108▲ 4.6×23 topics
- Genomic Characterization108▲ 16×3 topics
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma98▲ 37×2 topics
- Ewing's Sarcoma98▲ 43×1 topic
- Osteosarcoma98▲ 43×1 topic
- Biomarkers96▲ 3.8×17 topics
- Immune Response94▲ 3.6×21 topics
- Metastasis89▲ 6.3×12 topics
- Clinical Trials88▲ 3.4×17 topics
- Surgery85▲ 6.2×11 topics
- Gene Expression84▲ 3.3×18 topics
- Survival Analysis81▲ 7.2×7 topics
- Apoptosis79▲ 4.9×16 topics
- Molecular Classification78▲ 13×4 topics
- Fibrosis73▲ 9.1×7 topics
- Genomic Instability73▲ 14×3 topics
- PET Imaging72▲ 8.0×5 topics
- Immunohistochemistry67▲ 17×4 topics
- Molecular Pathology66▲ 14×3 topics
- Breast Cancer66▲ 5.6×11 topics
- Molecular Profiling60▲ 12×3 topics
- Desmoid Tumor58▲ 71×1 topic
- Solitary Fibrous Tumor58▲ 71×1 topic
- Tumor Models57▲ 22×2 topics
- Bystander Effects54▲ 59×1 topic
- Radiation54▲ 59×1 topic
Which research topics does Armed Forces Institute of Pathology publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments and Forensic and Genetic Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1 works
- 2 bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research Molecular Biology 0 works
- 3 Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 0 works
- 4 Forensic and Genetic Research Genetics 0 works
- 5 Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas Oncology 0 works
- 6 Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection Complementary and alternative medicine 0 works
- 7 Medical Imaging and Analysis Biomedical Engineering 0 works
- 8 Historical Medical Research and Treatments Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 0 works
- 9 Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis Toxicology 0 works
- 10 Brain Metastases and Treatment Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Armed Forces Institute of Pathology's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 40% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Silver Spring
- United States Food and Drug Administration
- Naval Medical Research Command
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
- NOAA National Weather Service
- NOAA National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service
- American Nurses Association
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.