Cambridge Scientific (United States)
In research, Cambridge Scientific (United States) stands highest in Computer Science (#1,755 of 6,336 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#5,656 of 17,446 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #9,751 of 34,923
- Rank in United States
- #2,013 of 7,310
- Research works
- 657 ▲ 11% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 24k 35.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 25.7% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.04× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 22% world 40%
- International
- 14% world 18%
What is Cambridge Scientific (United States) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer ScienceField | #1,755 of 6,336 | 17.9% | 201 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #5,656 of 17,446 | 16.1% | 452 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Cambridge Scientific (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Cambridge Scientific (United States) work in?
In 2022-now, 46% of research at Cambridge Scientific (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 25% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (31%), Medicine (15%), Social Sciences (11%).
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 21 fields, with their numbers
- Physical Sciences2646.0%
- Computer Science1731.0%
- Engineering46.7%
- Physics and Astronomy12.6%
- Mathematics11.8%
- Materials Science11.6%
- Environmental Science11.3%
- Chemistry00.8%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences00.2%
- Social Sciences1425.1%
- Health Sciences1017.1%
- Medicine815.1%
- Health Professions12.0%
- Life Sciences711.8%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 4.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 21 fields, with their numbers
- Decision Sciences4.16×2 works
- Computer Science3.98×17 works
- Immunology and Microbiology2.40×1 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.50×4 works
- Mathematics1.49×1 works
- Physics and Astronomy1.18×2 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.09×2 works
- Social Sciences0.87×6 works
- Psychology0.86×2 works
- Arts and Humanities0.85×1 works
- Medicine0.79×8 works
- Health Professions0.76×1 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.65×1 works
- Neuroscience0.61×1 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.57×0 works
- Chemistry0.49×0 works
- Materials Science0.47×1 works
- Engineering0.45×4 works
- Environmental Science0.27×1 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.13×0 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.04×0 works
- Decision Sciences 4.2×
- Computer Science 4.0×
- Immunology and Microbiology 2.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.5×
- Mathematics 1.5×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.1×
- Social Sciences 0.9×
- Psychology 0.9×
- Arts and Humanities 0.8×
- Medicine 0.8×
- Health Professions 0.8×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.7×
- Neuroscience 0.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.6×
- Chemistry 0.5×
- Materials Science 0.5×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Environmental Science 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Cambridge Scientific (United States)?
Ranked on the quality score, Michael J. Muller, Pamela M. Holland and Mark A. Marchionni lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Cambridge Scientific (United States).
- 1
Michael J. Muller
United States · #246,365 worldwide 14k citations · 333 works
- 2
Pamela M. Holland
United States · #358,155 worldwide 5.1k citations · 66 works
- 3
Mark A. Marchionni
United States · #367,625 worldwide 7.3k citations · 59 works
- 4
Robert N McBurney
United States · #590,734 worldwide 4.3k citations · 92 works
- 5
Jessica He
United States · #698,430 worldwide 415 citations · 28 works
- 6
Michelle Brachman
United States · #705,183 worldwide 213 citations · 27 works
- 7
Li-Te Cheng
United States · #858,843 worldwide 1.4k citations · 46 works
- 8
Matthew P Rausch
United States · #1,131,424 worldwide 1k citations · 40 works
- 9
J. V. Dave
United States · #1,259,245 worldwide 2.2k citations · 73 works
- 10
Andrew C. Lake
United States · #1,291,819 worldwide 2.1k citations · 33 works
Which keywords describe research at Cambridge Scientific (United States)?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Machine Learning, Surveillance, Ethics, Fairness, Neural Networks and Data Integration.
- Workflow Management
- Misinformation
- Maritime Archaeology
- Entanglement
- Software Development
- Precision Medicine
- Tumor Microenvironment
- Semantic Web
- Chatbots
- Word Representation
- Customer Experience
- Topic Modeling
- Natural Language Processing
- Interpretable Models
- Information Retrieval
- Deep Neural Networks
- Deep Learning
- Ethics
- Surveillance
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Big Data
- Neural Networks
- Fairness
- Data Integration
- Human-Robot Interaction
- Text Classification
- Machine Learning Interpretability
- Social Media
- Bioinformatics
- Machine Translation
- Cancer Immunotherapy
- Knowledge Management
- Service Robots
- Communication
- Quantum Information
- Cognitive Load
- Fake News
- Mediterranean
- Polarization
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Machine Learning7▲ 3.8×22 topics
- Artificial Intelligence6▲ 7.8×9 topics
- Big Data5▲ 10×9 topics
- Surveillance3▲ 18×3 topics
- Neural Networks3▲ 3.1×9 topics
- Ethics2▲ 8.9×1 topic
- Fairness2▲ 44×1 topic
- Deep Learning2▲ 1.24×16 topics
- Data Integration2▲ 18×3 topics
- Deep Neural Networks2▲ 23×2 topics
- Human-Robot Interaction2▲ 24×2 topics
- Information Retrieval2▲ 13×2 topics
- Text Classification2▲ 18×2 topics
- Interpretable Models2▲ 49×1 topic
- Machine Learning Interpretability2▲ 49×1 topic
- Natural Language Processing2▲ 11×4 topics
- Social Media2▲ 1.93×5 topics
- Topic Modeling2▲ 17×2 topics
- Bioinformatics1▲ 20×2 topics
- Customer Experience1▲ 14×2 topics
- Machine Translation1▲ 14×1 topic
- Word Representation1▲ 19×1 topic
- Cancer Immunotherapy1▲ 14×3 topics
- Chatbots1▲ 31×1 topic
- Knowledge Management1▲ 3.9×3 topics
- Semantic Web1▲ 22×2 topics
- Service Robots1▲ 22×1 topic
- Tumor Microenvironment1▲ 4.8×3 topics
- Communication1▲ 6.5×3 topics
- Precision Medicine1▲ 4.1×5 topics
- Quantum Information1▲ 17×2 topics
- Software Development1▲ 36×2 topics
- Cognitive Load1▲ 38×2 topics
- Entanglement1▲ 12×3 topics
- Fake News1▲ 27×1 topic
- Maritime Archaeology1▲ 98×1 topic
- Mediterranean1▲ 20×1 topic
- Misinformation1▲ 27×1 topic
- Polarization1▲ 12×2 topics
- Workflow Management1▲ 25×2 topics
Which research topics does Cambridge Scientific (United States) publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Topic Modeling and AI in Service Interactions.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 2 works
- 2 Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Artificial Intelligence 2 works
- 3 Topic Modeling Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 4 AI in Service Interactions Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 5 Misinformation and Its Impacts Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 6 Maritime and Coastal Archaeology Archeology 1 works
- 7 Scientific Computing and Data Management Information Systems and Management 1 works
- 8 Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 9 CAR-T cell therapy research Oncology 1 works
- 10 Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Oncology 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Cambridge Scientific (United States)'s research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 11% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Cambridge Scientific (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00022% in 2024.
Fractional works of Cambridge Scientific (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Watertown
- Boston Biomedical Research Institute
- Primary Source
- Radiation Monitoring Devices (United States)
- Arsenal Medical (United States)
- Pathfinder International
- New England Research Institutes
- Perkins School for Blind
- Advanced Mechanical Technology (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Cambridge Scientific (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
