Cambridge Scientific (United States)
In research, Cambridge Scientific (United States) stands highest in Computer Science (#1,241 of 7,020 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#4,892 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #6,559 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #1,507 of 8,685
- Research works
- 657 ▲ 106% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 24k 35.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 42.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 22% world 28%
What is Cambridge Scientific (United States) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer ScienceField | #1,241 of 7,020 | 40.2% | 201 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #4,892 of 21,541 | 33.2% | 452 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Cambridge Scientific (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 4.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Decision Sciences 4.3×
- Computer Science 4.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology 2.2×
- Mathematics 1.7×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.2×
- Arts and Humanities 1.0×
- Health Professions 0.9×
- Medicine 0.9×
- Psychology 0.8×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.8×
- Social Sciences 0.7×
- Materials Science 0.5×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Neuroscience 0.4×
- Environmental Science 0.3×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Cambridge Scientific (United States)?
Ranked on the composite score, Donald L. Wise, Joseph D. Gresser and José Canosa lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Cambridge Scientific (United States).
- 1 Donald L. Wise United States · #774,841 worldwide 83 citations · 56 works
- 2 Joseph D. Gresser United States · #886,221 worldwide 56 citations · 23 works
- 3 José Canosa United States · #893,563 worldwide 7 citations · 15 works
- 4 Baxter H. Armstrong United States · #1,164,329 worldwide 36 citations · 20 works
- 5 Debra J. Trantolo United States · #1,323,780 worldwide 37 citations · 22 works
- 6 Edwin F. Sawyer United States · #1,408,476 worldwide 1 citations · 37 works
- 7 Steven Ross United States · #1,481,169 worldwide 28 citations · 21 works
Which keywords describe research at Cambridge Scientific (United States)?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Neural Networks, Surveillance, Data Integration, Information Retrieval and Text Classification.
- Polarization
- Misinformation
- Maritime Archaeology
- Fake News
- Cancer Therapy
- Data Mining
- Cancer Immunotherapy
- Semantic Web
- Word Representation
- Machine Learning Interpretability
- Epidemiology
- Social Media
- Information Retrieval
- Ethics
- Surveillance
- Neural Networks
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Big Data
- Deep Learning
- Data Integration
- Fairness
- Text Classification
- Deep Neural Networks
- Interpretable Models
- Machine Translation
- Knowledge Management
- Tumor Microenvironment
- Communication
- Human-Robot Interaction
- Customer Experience
- Immunotherapy
- Mediterranean
- Natural Language Processing
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 34 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 34 words, with their numbers
- Machine Learning5▲ 3.2×20 topics
- Artificial Intelligence4▲ 6.3×9 topics
- Big Data4▲ 8.7×8 topics
- Neural Networks3▲ 3.7×9 topics
- Deep Learning2▲ 1.38×16 topics
- Surveillance2▲ 15×3 topics
- Data Integration2▲ 22×3 topics
- Ethics2▲ 6.9×1 topic
- Fairness2▲ 39×1 topic
- Information Retrieval2▲ 16×2 topics
- Text Classification2▲ 22×2 topics
- Social Media2▲ 2.2×5 topics
- Deep Neural Networks1▲ 27×2 topics
- Epidemiology1▼ 0.74×10 topics
- Interpretable Models1▲ 66×1 topic
- Machine Learning Interpretability1▲ 66×1 topic
- Machine Translation1▲ 17×1 topic
- Word Representation1▲ 23×1 topic
- Knowledge Management1▲ 4.6×3 topics
- Semantic Web1▲ 27×2 topics
- Tumor Microenvironment1▲ 5.8×3 topics
- Cancer Immunotherapy1▲ 15×3 topics
- Communication1▲ 7.9×3 topics
- Data Mining1▲ 3.1×4 topics
- Human-Robot Interaction1▲ 22×2 topics
- Cancer Therapy1▲ 3.8×5 topics
- Customer Experience1▲ 15×2 topics
- Fake News1▲ 32×1 topic
- Immunotherapy1▲ 3.1×5 topics
- Maritime Archaeology1▲ 112×1 topic
- Mediterranean1▲ 23×1 topic
- Misinformation1▲ 32×1 topic
- Natural Language Processing1▲ 9.0×3 topics
- Polarization1▲ 14×2 topics
Which research topics does Cambridge Scientific (United States) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Topic Modeling and Misinformation and Its Impacts.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 2 works
- 2 Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 3 Topic Modeling Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 4 Misinformation and Its Impacts Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 5 Maritime and Coastal Archaeology Archeology 1 works
- 6 Scientific Computing and Data Management Information Systems and Management 1 works
- 7 CAR-T cell therapy research Oncology 1 works
- 8 AI in Service Interactions Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 9 Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Oncology 1 works
- 10 Semantic Web and Ontologies Artificial Intelligence 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Cambridge Scientific (United States)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 106% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Watertown
- Boston Biomedical Research Institute
- Primary Source
- Radiation Monitoring Devices (United States)
- Arsenal Medical (United States)
- Pathfinder International
- New England Research Institutes
- Perkins School for Blind
- Advanced Mechanical Technology (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.