Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Abingdon · United Kingdom

Cellmark Forensic Services

cellmarkforensics.co.uk/index.htmlROR OpenAlex
Research works
57
▼ 8% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.1k
19.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
3.1%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
19%
world 40%
International
23%
world 18%
Cellmark Forensic Services

Not ranked overall: Cellmark Forensic Services is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Cellmark Forensic Services work in?

In all years, 60% of research at Cellmark Forensic Services is in Life Sciences, 18% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (56%), Medicine (15%), Environmental Science (5%). It does 3.2× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Life Sciences: 34 fractional works · 60.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 32 fractional works · 56.2% of its workMolecular Biology: 17 fractional works · 29.2% of its workGenetics: 15 fractional works · 26.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.6% of its workInsect Science: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workHealth Sciences: 10 fractional works · 18.2% of its workMedicine: 8 fractional works · 14.5% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 4 fractional works · 6.5% of its workEmergency Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 3.1% of its workOccupational Therapy: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOrthodontics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPhysical Sciences: 8 fractional works · 13.6% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 5.4% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 2.9% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPaleontology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGeology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSpace and Planetary Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSpectroscopy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 5 fractional works · 8.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 4.8% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCommunication: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workArcheology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKCellmark ForensicServices57fractional works, all years
Life Sciences60%Physical Sciences14%Health Sciences18%Social Sciences8%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 19 fields, with their numbers
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology3256.2%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences23.6%
    3. Neuroscience00.2%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.0%
    1. Medicine814.5%
    2. Health Professions23.1%
    3. Dentistry00.6%
    1. Environmental Science35.4%
    2. Computer Science22.9%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences12.3%
    4. Physics and Astronomy11.8%
    5. Engineering10.9%
    6. Chemistry00.3%
    7. Mathematics00.1%
    1. Social Sciences34.8%
    2. Arts and Humanities12.3%
    3. Psychology00.5%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting00.3%
    5. Decision Sciences00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1.02× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 6.78× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Computer Science: 1.56× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEnvironmental Science: 1.49× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 2.46× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.90× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 1.62× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 2.79× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesSocial Sciences: 0.65× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 6.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 9 fields, with their numbers
  1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology6.78×2 works
  2. Decision Sciences2.79×0 works
  3. Health Professions2.46×0 works
  4. Arts and Humanities1.62×0 works
  5. Computer Science1.56×1 works
  6. Environmental Science1.49×0 works
  7. Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.02×0 works
  8. Medicine0.90×1 works
  9. Social Sciences0.65×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Cellmark Forensic Services?

Ranked on the quality score, Amy D. Roeder, Paul G. Debenham and A. Michelle Edwards lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Cellmark Forensic Services.

  1. 1 Amy D. Roeder United Kingdom · #1,014,754 worldwide 2.1k citations · 38 works
  2. 2 Paul G. Debenham United Kingdom · #2,532,353 worldwide 1.9k citations · 55 works
  3. 3 A. Michelle Edwards United Kingdom · #3,499,084 worldwide 2 citations · 17 works
  4. 4 Alastair Vannan United Kingdom · #4,289,610 worldwide 2 citations · 17 works
  5. 5 Geraldine Davidson United Kingdom · #4,851,439 worldwide 199 citations · 22 works
  6. 6 Andrew J. McDonald United Kingdom · #4,914,751 worldwide 439 citations · 38 works
All ranked researchers at Cellmark Forensic Services

What are the most cited papers from Cellmark Forensic Services?

The most cited paper from Cellmark Forensic Services is "Development, multiplexing, and application of ARMS tests for common mutations in the CFTR gene." (Richard M. Ferrie, Martin J Schwarz, N. H. Robertson et al., 1992), with 248 citations. Next come "Structural variation on the short arm of the human Y chromosome: recurrent multigene deletions encompassing Amelogenin Y" (165) and "mRNA profiling using a minimum of five mRNA markers per body fluid and a novel scoring method for body fluid identification" (143).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Development, multiplexing, and application of ARMS tests for common mutations in the CFTR gene. Richard M. Ferrie, Martin J Schwarz, N. H. Robertson et al. · PubMed Aug 1992 248
2 Structural variation on the short arm of the human Y chromosome: recurrent multigene deletions encompassing Amelogenin Y Mark A. Jobling, Iek Chi C. Lo, Daniel J. Turner et al. · Human Molecular Genetics Open access 22 Dec 2006 165
3 mRNA profiling using a minimum of five mRNA markers per body fluid and a novel scoring method for body fluid identification Amy D. Roeder, Cordula Haas · International Journal of Legal Medicine 19 Dec 2012 143
4 RNA/DNA co-analysis from human saliva and semen stains – Results of a third collaborative EDNAP exercise Cordula Haas et al. · Forensic Science International Genetics Open access 17 Nov 2012 138
5 Traumatic axonal damage in the brain can be detected using β‐APP immunohistochemistry within 35 min after head injury to human adults Tibor Hortobágyi, Steven G. Wise, Nicholas Hunt et al. · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology Open access 8 Mar 2007 131
All 96 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Cellmark Forensic Services?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Genomic Analysis, Ancient DNA, Human Evolution, Forensic Genetics, Population History, Gene Expression, Data Analysis and Normalization.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 38 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 38 words, with their numbers
  1. Genomic Analysis14▲ 86×3 topics
  2. Ancient DNA14▲ 414×2 topics
  3. Human Evolution14▲ 1000×2 topics
  4. Forensic Genetics13▲ 1447×1 topic
  5. Population History13▲ 1447×1 topic
  6. Gene Expression10▲ 29×5 topics
  7. Data Analysis9▲ 50×2 topics
  8. Normalization9▲ 226×2 topics
  9. Quantitative9▲ 129×1 topic
  10. Real-Time PCR9▲ 362×1 topic
  11. DNA Barcoding2▲ 26×2 topics
  12. Nanoparticles2▲ 2.8×4 topics
  13. Invasive Species2▲ 5.1×4 topics
  14. Oxidative Stress2▲ 1.68×5 topics
  15. Food Authentication2▲ 29×1 topic
  16. Fraud Detection2▲ 35×1 topic
  17. Public Health1▲ 1.74×4 topics
  18. Pulmonary Alveolar Microlithiasis1▲ 59×1 topic
  19. Pulmonary Sclerosing Hemangioma1▲ 59×1 topic
  20. Quality of Life1▲ 1.75×2 topics
  21. Biosensors1▲ 3.9×3 topics
  22. Mass Spectrometry1▲ 9.8×2 topics
  23. Illegal Wildlife Trade1▲ 174×1 topic
  24. Machine Learning1◆ 0.89×3 topics
  25. Parrot Poaching1▲ 174×1 topic
  26. Sex Determination1▲ 40×2 topics
  27. Age Estimation1▲ 38×1 topic
  28. Chemical Imaging1▲ 45×1 topic
  29. Epidemiology1▼ 0.45×9 topics
  30. Experimental Tools1▲ 72×1 topic
  31. Fingermark Residue1▲ 295×1 topic
  32. Mitochondria1▲ 11×1 topic
  33. Occupational Science1▲ 102×1 topic
  34. Population Genetics1▲ 11×5 topics
  35. Reactive Oxygen Species1▲ 3.5×1 topic
  36. Skeletal Development1▲ 77×1 topic
  37. Smartphones1▲ 45×1 topic
  38. Therapy Practice1▲ 102×1 topic

Which research topics does Cellmark Forensic Services publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Forensic and Genetic Research, Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies, Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies and Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning.

Forensic and Genetic Res…2Forensic and Genetic Research: 2 fractional worksSexual Assault and Victimization Studies: 0 fractional worksForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies: 0 fractional worksDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning: 0 fractional worksAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning: 0 fractional worksGenital Health and Disease: 0 fractional worksUrological Disorders and Treatments: 0 fractional worksForensic Fingerprint Detection Methods: 0 fractional worksMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications: 0 fractional worksInfection Control in Healthcare: 0 fractional works
GeneticsGender StudiesArcheologyArtificial Intelligence5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Forensic and Genetic Research Genetics 2 works
  2. 2 Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies Gender Studies 0 works
  3. 3 Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies Archeology 0 works
  4. 4 Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  5. 5 Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  6. 6 Genital Health and Disease Surgery 0 works
  7. 7 Urological Disorders and Treatments Urology 0 works
  8. 8 Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods Safety Research 0 works
  9. 9 Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications Molecular Biology 0 works
  10. 10 Infection Control in Healthcare Infectious Diseases 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available18.7%not open81.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors22.7%domestic only77.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Cellmark Forensic Services's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 8% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Cellmark Forensic Services as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000033% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Cellmark Forensic Services0.000020% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Cellmark Forensic Services over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Abingdon

All research institutions in Abingdon

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Cellmark Forensic Services. Posts are plain text and can be reported.