Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Madison · United States

Cellular Dynamics International (United States)

cellulardynamics.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
61
▲ 35% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.5k
40.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.9%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
43%
world 40%
International
29%
world 18%
Cellular Dynamics International (United States)

Not ranked overall: Cellular Dynamics International (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Cellular Dynamics International (United States) work in?

In all years, 51% of research at Cellular Dynamics International (United States) is in Life Sciences, 30% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (36%), Medicine (29%), Engineering (12%). It does 2.8× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Life Sciences: 31 fractional works · 51.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 22 fractional works · 36.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 18 fractional works · 30.2% of its workBiophysics: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workCancer Research: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workCell Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 7 fractional works · 11.7% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 6 fractional works · 10.1% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth Sciences: 18 fractional works · 30.3% of its workMedicine: 18 fractional works · 29.3% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 5 fractional works · 9.1% of its workSurgery: 3 fractional works · 5.5% of its workPhysiology: 2 fractional works · 4.0% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workHepatology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 10 fractional works · 17.3% of its workEngineering: 7 fractional works · 12.3% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 6 fractional works · 10.6% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workBiomaterials: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSpectroscopy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBioengineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKCellular DynamicsInternational…61fractional works, all years
Life Sciences51%Physical Sciences17%Health Sciences30%Social Sciences1%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology2236.0%
    2. Neuroscience711.7%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences11.8%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.8%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.7%
    1. Medicine1829.3%
    2. Health Professions00.7%
    3. Nursing00.3%
    1. Engineering712.3%
    2. Computer Science11.6%
    3. Materials Science11.3%
    4. Chemistry00.8%
    5. Environmental Science00.6%
    6. Chemical Engineering00.5%
    7. Physics and Astronomy00.1%
    1. Psychology00.8%
    2. Social Sciences00.6%
    3. Decision Sciences00.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 8.36× its world share, 4 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 3.88× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 3.91× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 1.02× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.28× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.29× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringMaterials Science: 1.08× its world share, 0 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 0.33× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.31× its world share, 2 worksMedicineDecision Sciences: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 1.65× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.11× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 8.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 13 fields, with their numbers
  1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology8.36×4 works
  2. Neuroscience3.91×1 works
  3. Immunology and Microbiology3.88×0 works
  4. Psychology1.65×0 works
  5. Medicine1.31×2 works
  6. Materials Science1.08×0 works
  7. Chemistry1.02×0 works
  8. Physics and Astronomy0.33×0 works
  9. Engineering0.29×0 works
  10. Computer Science0.28×0 works
  11. Health Professions0.25×0 works
  12. Social Sciences0.11×0 works
  13. Decision Sciences0.09×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Cellular Dynamics International (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Blake D. Anson, Eugenia M. C. Jones and Kile P. Mangan lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Cellular Dynamics International (United States).

  1. 1 Blake D. Anson United States · #1,122,631 worldwide 3.8k citations · 69 works
  2. 2 Eugenia M. C. Jones United States · #1,756,581 worldwide 1.1k citations · 29 works
  3. 3 Kile P. Mangan United States · #1,791,137 worldwide 332 citations · 18 works
  4. 4 Natsuyo Aoyama United States · #2,224,118 worldwide 1.3k citations · 21 works
  5. 5 Coby B. Carlson United States · #2,536,317 worldwide 2k citations · 72 works
All ranked researchers at Cellular Dynamics International (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Cellular Dynamics International (United States)?

The most cited paper from Cellular Dynamics International (United States) is "High purity human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: electrophysiological properties of action potentials and ionic currents" (Junyi Ma, Liang Guo, Steve Fiene et al., 2011), with 805 citations. Next come "Extracellular Matrix Promotes Highly Efficient Cardiac Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells" (456) and "International Multisite Study of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Drug Proarrhythmic Potential Assessment" (382).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 High purity human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: electrophysiological properties of action potentials and ionic currents Junyi Ma, Liang Guo, Steve Fiene et al. · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology Open access 3 Sep 2011 805
2 Extracellular Matrix Promotes Highly Efficient Cardiac Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Jianhua Zhang, Matthew Klos, Gisela F. Wilson et al. · Circulation Research Open access 22 Aug 2012 456
3 International Multisite Study of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Drug Proarrhythmic Potential Assessment Ksenia Blinova et al. · Cell Reports Open access Sep 2018 382
4 Clinical-grade stem cell–derived retinal pigment epithelium patch rescues retinal degeneration in rodents and pigs Ruchi Sharma et al. · Science Translational Medicine Open access 16 Jan 2019 375
5 Quality Control Guidelines for Clinical-Grade Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Stephen K. Sullivan et al. · Regenerative Medicine Open access 12 Sep 2018 284
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Cellular Dynamics International (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Regenerative Medicine, Differentiation, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Transcriptional Regulation, Embryonic Stem Cells, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Tissue Engineering and Bioprinting.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Regenerative Medicine10▲ 77×4 topics
  2. Differentiation8▲ 173×2 topics
  3. Pluripotent Stem Cells7▲ 175×2 topics
  4. Transcriptional Regulation7▲ 48×3 topics
  5. Embryonic Stem Cells7▲ 160×1 topic
  6. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells7▲ 338×1 topic
  7. Tissue Engineering6▲ 20×5 topics
  8. Bioprinting5▲ 192×1 topic
  9. Microfluidic Devices5▲ 105×1 topic
  10. Nanomaterials5▲ 10×2 topics
  11. Electrode Arrays5▲ 144×1 topic
  12. Neural Stimulation5▲ 144×1 topic
  13. Ion Channels4▲ 31×4 topics
  14. Sudden Cardiac Death4▲ 56×2 topics
  15. Cancer4▲ 4.4×9 topics
  16. Calcium Signaling4▲ 46×3 topics
  17. Genetic Testing4▲ 36×3 topics
  18. Genome Engineering4▲ 101×1 topic
  19. RNA-Guided4▲ 101×1 topic
  20. Arrhythmias4▲ 44×2 topics
  21. Cardiac Electrophysiology4▲ 78×1 topic
  22. Long-QT Syndrome4▲ 78×1 topic
  23. Biomarkers3▲ 9.2×4 topics
  24. Oxidative Stress3▲ 3.0×10 topics
  25. Drug Delivery3▲ 10×3 topics
  26. Biogenesis3▲ 41×2 topics
  27. Extracellular Matrix3▲ 18×4 topics
  28. Clinical Trials2▲ 6.1×2 topics
  29. Exosomes2▲ 127×1 topic
  30. Extracellular Vesicles2▲ 127×1 topic
  31. Regulatory Challenges2▲ 44×1 topic
  32. Stem Cell Regulation2▲ 152×1 topic
  33. Decellularization2▲ 87×1 topic
  34. Organ Engineering2▲ 87×1 topic
  35. Cellular Imaging2▲ 45×2 topics
  36. Angiogenesis2▲ 5.8×4 topics
  37. Bioimage Analysis2▲ 96×1 topic
  38. High-Content Screening2▲ 96×1 topic
  39. Macrophages1▲ 13×3 topics
  40. Gene Therapy1▲ 7.5×2 topics

Which research topics does Cellular Dynamics International (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Extracellular vesicles in disease, Cell Image Analysis Techniques, Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications.

Extracellular vesicles i…2Extracellular vesicles in disease: 2 fractional worksCell Image Analysis Tech…2Cell Image Analysis Techniques: 2 fractional worksTissue Engineering and R…1Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: 1 fractional worksElectrospun Nanofibers i…0Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications: 0 fractional works3D Printing in Biomedica…03D Printing in Biomedical Research: 0 fractional worksNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms: 0 fractional worksAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases: 0 fractional worksPluripotent Stem Cells Research: 0 fractional worksNeuroscience and Neural Engineering: 0 fractional worksAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications: 0 fractional works
Molecular BiologyBiophysicsSurgeryBiomaterials5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Extracellular vesicles in disease Molecular Biology 2 works
  2. 2 Cell Image Analysis Techniques Biophysics 2 works
  3. 3 Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Surgery 1 works
  4. 4 Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications Biomaterials 0 works
  5. 5 3D Printing in Biomedical Research Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms Neurology 0 works
  7. 7 Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases Immunology 0 works
  8. 8 Pluripotent Stem Cells Research Molecular Biology 0 works
  9. 9 Neuroscience and Neural Engineering Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 0 works
  10. 10 Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available43.4%not open56.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors28.6%domestic only71.4%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Cellular Dynamics International (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 35% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting2010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Cellular Dynamics International (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000053% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%Cellular Dynamics International (United States)0.000037% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Cellular Dynamics International (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Madison

All research institutions in Madison

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Cellular Dynamics International (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.