Central Washington University
In research, Central Washington University stands highest in Physical Sciences (#5,574 of 12,888 worldwide), Social Sciences (#6,730 of 10,521 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#5,216 of 6,365 worldwide), 2022–2025.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #9,368 of 28,054 · #6,548 all time
- Rank in United States
- #1,248 of 4,192
- Research works
- 3k ▲ 18% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 48k 16.1 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 12.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 28% world 28%
What is Central Washington University known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #5,574 of 12,888 | 10.5% | 150 | #5477 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #6,730 of 10,521 | 14.2% | 195 | #2322 | |
| Social SciencesField | #5,216 of 6,365 | 15.0% | 85 | #1964 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Central Washington University sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Physical Sciences#5,477 #5,574
- Social Sciences#2,322 #6,730
- Social Sciences#1,964 #5,216
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 2.7×
- Psychology 2.6×
- Decision Sciences 2.5×
- Arts and Humanities 2.5×
- Chemistry 2.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.7×
- Social Sciences 1.6×
- Computer Science 1.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.5×
- Veterinary 1.2×
- Neuroscience 1.0×
- Health Professions 0.9×
- Mathematics 0.9×
- Nursing 0.8×
- Environmental Science 0.8×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.6×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Medicine 0.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.4×
- Chemical Engineering 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.3×
- Energy 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Central Washington University?
Ranked on the composite score, Jeffrey Lee, Walter Szeliga and V. M. Santillan lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Central Washington University.
- 1 Jeffrey Lee United States · #269,501 worldwide 139 citations · 27 works
- 2 Walter Szeliga United States · #465,982 worldwide 95 citations · 25 works
- 3 V. M. Santillan United States · #557,258 worldwide 35 citations · 17 works
- 4 David L. Gee United States · #614,294 worldwide 38 citations · 16 works
- 5 Barry G. DeBoer United States · #792,706 worldwide 101 citations · 25 works
- 6 Sara Amato United States · #823,217 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
- 7 David Thompson United States · #826,967 worldwide 47 citations · 16 works
- 8 Ethan A. Bergman United States · #833,545 worldwide 5 citations · 16 works
- 9 Matthew C. Altman United States · #879,024 worldwide 5 citations · 24 works
- 10 Lisa L. Ely United States · #977,994 worldwide 85 citations · 19 works
Which keywords describe research at Central Washington University?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Machine Learning, Deep Neural Networks, Identity, Big Data, Globalization, Engineering Education, Risk Management and Cultural Identity.
- Project Success
- Empire
- Holocene
- Assessment Methods
- Cultural Transmission
- Secularism
- Lifelong Learning
- Leadership
- Information Visualization
- Meta-Analysis
- Interpretable Models
- Feminism
- Student Engagement
- Engineering Education
- Supply Chain Management
- Cultural Identity
- Deep Neural Networks
- Mental Health
- Big Data
- Globalization
- Machine Learning
- Sustainability
- Identity
- Education
- Data Mining
- Risk Management
- Nationalism
- Corporate Governance
- Curriculum Development
- Spatial Analysis
- Machine Learning Interpretability
- User Interaction
- Visual Analytics
- Learning Outcomes
- Geological Mapping
- Tectonics
- Injury Prevention
- Asymmetric Synthesis
- Plate Tectonics
- Construction Projects
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Machine Learning22▲ 1.58×39 topics
- Globalization16▲ 1.95×23 topics
- Sustainability15▲ 1.45×25 topics
- Big Data12▲ 3.2×11 topics
- Identity12▲ 3.9×16 topics
- Mental Health11▲ 1.72×23 topics
- Education9▲ 1.30×17 topics
- Deep Neural Networks9▲ 20×2 topics
- Data Mining9▲ 2.9×7 topics
- Cultural Identity9▲ 4.1×12 topics
- Risk Management9▲ 4.3×11 topics
- Supply Chain Management9▲ 2.2×14 topics
- Nationalism8▲ 4.2×12 topics
- Engineering Education8▲ 21×4 topics
- Corporate Governance8▲ 2.5×6 topics
- Student Engagement7▲ 4.2×10 topics
- Curriculum Development7▲ 2.3×7 topics
- Feminism7▲ 5.6×8 topics
- Spatial Analysis6▲ 17×2 topics
- Interpretable Models6▲ 36×1 topic
- Machine Learning Interpretability6▲ 36×1 topic
- Meta-Analysis6▲ 2.5×8 topics
- User Interaction6▲ 49×2 topics
- Information Visualization6▲ 73×1 topic
- Visual Analytics6▲ 73×1 topic
- Leadership6▲ 2.9×10 topics
- Learning Outcomes5▲ 3.0×6 topics
- Lifelong Learning5▲ 5.8×4 topics
- Geological Mapping5▲ 14×2 topics
- Secularism5▲ 11×4 topics
- Tectonics4▲ 9.0×3 topics
- Cultural Transmission4▲ 13×4 topics
- Injury Prevention4▲ 8.6×4 topics
- Assessment Methods4▲ 8.8×3 topics
- Asymmetric Synthesis4▲ 18×4 topics
- Holocene4▲ 8.1×2 topics
- Plate Tectonics4▲ 6.1×2 topics
- Empire4▲ 10×2 topics
- Construction Projects4▲ 19×1 topic
- Project Success4▲ 21×1 topic
Which research topics does Central Washington University publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Data Visualization and Analytics, Construction Project Management and Performance and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Artificial Intelligence 6 works
- 2 Data Visualization and Analytics Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 6 works
- 3 Construction Project Management and Performance Management Science and Operations Research 4 works
- 4 Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping Artificial Intelligence 3 works
- 5 Islamic Studies and History Political Science and International Relations 3 works
- 6 Geological and Geochemical Analysis Geophysics 3 works
- 7 Engineering Education and Curriculum Development Media Technology 3 works
- 8 Corporate Finance and Governance Accounting 3 works
- 9 Geology and Paleoclimatology Research Atmospheric Science 3 works
- 10 Machine Learning and Data Classification Artificial Intelligence 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Central Washington University's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 18% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Ellensburg
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.