Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Arlington · United States

Cognitive Technologies (United States)

cog-tech.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
86
▼ 48% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.2k
13.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
7.5%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
36%
world 40%
International
28%
world 18%
Cognitive Technologies (United States)

Not ranked overall: Cognitive Technologies (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Cognitive Technologies (United States) work in?

In all years, 44% of research at Cognitive Technologies (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 34% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (24%), Engineering (12%), Psychology (12%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 38 fractional works · 44.2% of its workComputer Science: 20 fractional works · 23.7% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 11 fractional works · 12.3% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workInformation Systems: 2 fractional works · 2.5% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 2 fractional works · 2.3% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workComputer Science Applications: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSoftware: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEngineering: 11 fractional works · 12.2% of its workMechanical Engineering: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workAerospace Engineering: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOcean Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMechanics of Materials: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 4 fractional works · 5.0% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workNuclear and High Energy Physics: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 29 fractional works · 33.7% of its workPsychology: 10 fractional works · 12.2% of its workSocial Psychology: 4 fractional works · 5.0% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 2 fractional works · 2.7% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 2 fractional works · 2.3% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workApplied Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 7 fractional works · 8.1% of its workEducation: 4 fractional works · 5.1% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDevelopment: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDecision Sciences: 5 fractional works · 5.4% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 4 fractional works · 4.1% of its workGeneral Decision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 4 fractional works · 5.1% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workMarketing: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 2.7% of its workFinance: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 14 fractional works · 16.0% of its workMedicine: 8 fractional works · 8.7% of its workSurgery: 3 fractional works · 3.2% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workFamily Practice: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Professions: 6 fractional works · 7.3% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workMedical Laboratory Technology: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHealth Information Management: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 5 fractional works · 6.0% of its workNeuroscience: 4 fractional works · 4.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 3 fractional works · 3.6% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKCognitiveTechnologies…86fractional works, all years
Life Sciences6%Physical Sciences44%Health Sciences16%Social Sciences34%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 19 fields, with their numbers
    1. Computer Science2023.7%
    2. Engineering1112.2%
    3. Physics and Astronomy45.0%
    4. Environmental Science21.9%
    5. Mathematics10.6%
    6. Energy00.4%
    7. Materials Science00.3%
    8. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.1%
    1. Psychology1012.2%
    2. Social Sciences78.1%
    3. Decision Sciences55.4%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting45.1%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance22.7%
    6. Arts and Humanities00.2%
    1. Medicine88.7%
    2. Health Professions67.3%
    1. Neuroscience44.3%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology11.4%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 3.36× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 2.11× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.36× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.77× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.30× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 10.03× its world share, 3 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.32× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.52× its world share, 2 worksMedicineBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.69× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 5.77× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 4.17× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 4.19× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Physics and Astronomy, 10.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 15 fields, with their numbers
  1. Physics and Astronomy10.03×3 works
  2. Decision Sciences5.77×1 works
  3. Psychology4.19×2 works
  4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance4.17×1 works
  5. Neuroscience3.36×1 works
  6. Computer Science2.11×2 works
  7. Engineering0.77×2 works
  8. Business, Management and Accounting0.69×0 works
  9. Medicine0.52×2 works
  10. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.36×0 works
  11. Health Professions0.32×0 works
  12. Environmental Science0.30×0 works
  13. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.21×0 works
  14. Mathematics0.21×0 works
  15. Social Sciences0.05×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Cognitive Technologies (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Karen L. McGraw, Kathleen Dahlgren and Marvin S. Cohen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Cognitive Technologies (United States).

  1. 1 Karen L. McGraw United States · #2,357,980 worldwide 460 citations · 38 works
  2. 2 Kathleen Dahlgren United States · #3,448,258 worldwide 416 citations · 31 works
  3. 3 Marvin S. Cohen United States · #3,950,390 worldwide 803 citations · 82 works
All ranked researchers at Cognitive Technologies (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Cognitive Technologies (United States)?

The most cited paper from Cognitive Technologies (United States) is "Metarecognition in Time-Stressed Decision Making: Recognizing, Critiquing, and Correcting" (Marvin S. Cohen, Jared Freeman, Steven E. Wolf, 1996), with 222 citations. Next come "Intrinsic Plasticity Complements Long-Term Potentiation in Parallel Fiber Input Gain Control in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells" (168) and "6G White Paper on Edge Intelligence" (126).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Metarecognition in Time-Stressed Decision Making: Recognizing, Critiquing, and Correcting Marvin S. Cohen, Jared Freeman, Steven E. Wolf · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Jun 1996 222
2 Intrinsic Plasticity Complements Long-Term Potentiation in Parallel Fiber Input Gain Control in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells Amor Belmeguenaï, Eric Hosy, Fredrik Bengtsson et al. · Journal of Neuroscience Open access 13 Oct 2010 168
3 6G White Paper on Edge Intelligence Ella Peltonen, Mehdi Bennis, Michele Capobianco et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) PreprintOpen access 30 Apr 2020 126
4 Collaborative cross-checking to enhance resilience Emily S. Patterson, David D. Woods, Richard I. Cook et al. · Cognition Technology & Work 11 Dec 2006 126
5 Practice parameters facilitating adoption of advanced technologies for enhancing neuropsychological assessment paradigms Thomas D. Parsons, Timothy McMahan, Robert L Kane · The Clinical Neuropsychologist 7 Jun 2017 124
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Cognitive Technologies (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Modeling, Decision Making, Machine Learning, Knowledge Representation, Complex Systems, Soft Systems Methodology, System Dynamics and Cognitive Architecture.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Machine Learning6▲ 3.0×21 topics
  2. Modeling4▲ 20×2 topics
  3. Decision Making4▲ 21×4 topics
  4. Sustainability4▲ 2.4×7 topics
  5. Deep Learning3▲ 1.85×18 topics
  6. Sustainable Development3▲ 3.4×9 topics
  7. Healthcare3▲ 5.2×8 topics
  8. Knowledge Representation3▲ 26×3 topics
  9. Neural Networks3▲ 3.3×11 topics
  10. Complex Systems3▲ 22×2 topics
  11. Education3▲ 2.5×6 topics
  12. Cognitive Architecture3▲ 89×2 topics
  13. Soft Systems Methodology3▲ 90×1 topic
  14. System Dynamics3▲ 46×1 topic
  15. Mental Workload3▲ 55×2 topics
  16. Safety Climate3▲ 40×2 topics
  17. Healthcare Technology2▲ 121×2 topics
  18. Alarm Fatigue2▲ 199×1 topic
  19. Clinical Alarms2▲ 199×1 topic
  20. Cognitive Load2▲ 70×2 topics
  21. Meta-Analysis2▲ 4.9×2 topics
  22. Autonomous Vehicles2▲ 18×2 topics
  23. Medication Errors2▲ 50×2 topics
  24. Automation2▲ 41×1 topic
  25. Driver Distraction2▲ 82×1 topic
  26. Trust2▲ 9.6×3 topics
  27. Knowledge Management2▲ 5.0×7 topics
  28. Predictive Maintenance2▲ 31×2 topics
  29. Heuristic Search2▲ 112×1 topic
  30. Planning Systems2▲ 112×1 topic
  31. Prediction2▲ 22×2 topics
  32. Decision Support2▲ 35×1 topic
  33. Fuzzy Cognitive Maps2▲ 130×1 topic
  34. Critical Thinking Skills2▲ 19×1 topic
  35. Healthcare Quality2▲ 17×2 topics
  36. Instructional Interventions2▲ 34×1 topic
  37. Medical Errors2▲ 56×2 topics
  38. Neural Correlates2▲ 21×5 topics
  39. Executive Functioning2▲ 16×2 topics
  40. Maintenance2▲ 26×1 topic

Which research topics does Cognitive Technologies (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Neutrino Physics Research, Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies, Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories and Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect.

Neutrino Physics Research1Neutrino Physics Research: 1 fractional worksParticle physics theoret…1Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies: 1 fractional worksNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories: 1 fractional worksQuantum Electrodynamics …1Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect: 1 fractional worksComputational Physics an…1Computational Physics and Python Applications: 1 fractional worksQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics: 1 fractional worksDeception detection and forensic psychology: 1 fractional worksHousing, Finance, and Ne…0Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism: 0 fractional worksIndustrial Engineering and Technologies: 0 fractional worksTransportation Systems and Logistics: 0 fractional works
Nuclear and High Energy PhysicsStatistical and Nonlinear PhysicsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsArtificial Intelligence4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Neutrino Physics Research Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1 works
  2. 2 Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1 works
  3. 3 Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1 works
  4. 4 Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1 works
  5. 5 Computational Physics and Python Applications Artificial Intelligence 1 works
  6. 6 Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1 works
  7. 7 Deception detection and forensic psychology Social Psychology 1 works
  8. 8 Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism Finance 0 works
  9. 9 Industrial Engineering and Technologies Mechanical Engineering 0 works
  10. 10 Transportation Systems and Logistics Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available36.1%not open63.9%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors28.3%domestic only71.7%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Cognitive Technologies (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 48% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Cognitive Technologies (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000060% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%Cognitive Technologies (United States)0.000054% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Cognitive Technologies (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Arlington

All research institutions in Arlington

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Cognitive Technologies (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.