International Foundation for Electoral Systems
In research, International Foundation for Electoral Systems stands highest in Social Sciences (#4,351 of 9,585 worldwide), Physical Sciences (#5,357 of 10,670 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#3,077 of 5,988 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Education (Education is 4.7× its share of world research).
- World rank, 2022-now
- #6,542 of 22,385 · #8,722 all time
- Rank in United States
- #868 of 3,332
- Research works
- 1k ▼ 14% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 1.8k 1.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 5.4% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.92× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 76% world 40%
- International
- 72% world 18%
What is International Foundation for Electoral Systems known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #4,351 of 9,585 | 7.4% | 154 | #5484 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #5,357 of 10,670 | 2.8% | 100 | #7720 | |
| Social SciencesField | #3,077 of 5,988 | 7.4% | 99 | #3990 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where International Foundation for Electoral Systems sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#5,484 #4,351
- Physical Sciences#7,720 #5,357
- Social Sciences#3,990 #3,077
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Which fields of science does International Foundation for Electoral Systems work in?
In 2022-now, 49% of research at International Foundation for Electoral Systems is in Social Sciences, 34% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (31%), Engineering (14%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (11%). It does 1.9× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences16448.7%
- Social Sciences10631.4%
- Arts and Humanities205.9%
- Decision Sciences185.2%
- Business, Management and Accounting113.2%
- Psychology61.8%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance41.2%
- Physical Sciences11433.9%
- Engineering4613.8%
- Environmental Science3510.4%
- Computer Science247.2%
- Materials Science30.9%
- Chemistry20.5%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences20.5%
- Physics and Astronomy10.2%
- Mathematics10.2%
- Energy00.1%
- Chemical Engineering00.1%
- Life Sciences4212.4%
- Health Sciences175.0%
- Medicine113.2%
- Health Professions51.5%
- Nursing00.1%
- Dentistry00.1%
- Veterinary00.0%
What does International Foundation for Electoral Systems specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Education takes 4.7× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- EducationSubfield · 48.8 works4.7×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 5.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Decision Sciences5.41×18 works
- Social Sciences2.48×106 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences2.22×36 works
- Environmental Science2.10×35 works
- Arts and Humanities2.05×20 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.98×11 works
- Computer Science0.92×24 works
- Engineering0.92×46 works
- Psychology0.60×6 works
- Health Professions0.58×5 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.58×4 works
- Neuroscience0.37×2 works
- Chemistry0.33×2 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.32×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.31×2 works
- Nursing0.30×0 works
- Materials Science0.27×3 works
- Veterinary0.25×0 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.20×4 works
- Dentistry0.20×0 works
- Chemical Engineering0.16×0 works
- Mathematics0.16×1 works
- Medicine0.16×11 works
- Energy0.15×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.09×1 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.05×0 works
- Decision Sciences 5.4×
- Social Sciences 2.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2.2×
- Environmental Science 2.1×
- Arts and Humanities 2.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.0×
- Computer Science 0.9×
- Engineering 0.9×
- Psychology 0.6×
- Health Professions 0.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.6×
- Neuroscience 0.4×
- Chemistry 0.3×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.3×
- Nursing 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.3×
- Veterinary 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Dentistry 0.2×
- Chemical Engineering 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Energy 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at International Foundation for Electoral Systems?
Ranked on the quality score, Mariluza Sartori Deorce, Silvia Aline Bérgamo Xavier and Loruama Geovanna Guedes Vardiero lead among researchers whose main affiliation is International Foundation for Electoral Systems.
- 1
Mariluza Sartori Deorce
United States · #2,875,730 worldwide 0 citations · 45 works
- 2
Silvia Aline Bérgamo Xavier
United States · #2,877,502 worldwide 14 citations · 28 works
- 3
Loruama Geovanna Guedes Vardiero
United States · #2,930,246 worldwide 4 citations · 21 works
- 4
Andréia Penha Delmaschio
United States · #3,248,626 worldwide 4 citations · 27 works
- 5
Aline Marchiori Crespo
United States · #3,456,954 worldwide 25 citations · 29 works
- 6
Benno Rottermann
United States · #3,514,238 worldwide 157 citations · 35 works
- 7
José Geraldo Ferreira da Silva
United States · #3,859,560 worldwide 2 citations · 15 works
- 8
Mariella Berger Andrade
United States · #3,893,546 worldwide 10 citations · 20 works
- 9
Tatiana Aparecida Moreira
United States · #3,965,233 worldwide 5 citations · 17 works
- 10
Marlon Alves Peçanha da Silva
United States · #4,008,741 worldwide 6 citations · 16 works
Which keywords describe research at International Foundation for Electoral Systems?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Teacher Training, Qualitative Research, Public Policy, Online Learning, Curriculum Development, Sustainability, Social Inequality and Educational Technology.
- Teaching Methodologies
- Didactic Models
- Research
- Economic Analysis
- Educational Games
- Eco-friendly Practices
- WebQuests
- Social Network Analysis
- Research Methods
- Data Analysis
- Critical Pedagogy
- Biodiversity
- Distance Learning
- Educational Policies
- Waste Management
- Education
- Sustainable Development
- Educational Technology
- Online Learning
- Sustainability
- Teacher Training
- Qualitative Research
- Public Policy
- Curriculum Development
- Social Inequality
- Renewable Energy
- Environmental Education
- Inclusive Education
- Pedagogical Practices
- Educational Reform
- Science Education
- Organizational Management
- Digital Literacy
- Media Education
- Water Resources
- Social Participation
- Agroecology
- Active Learning
- Social Movements
- Legislation
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Teacher Training37▲ 18×10 topics
- Sustainability30▲ 3.6×28 topics
- Qualitative Research28▲ 9.9×9 topics
- Online Learning24▲ 8.5×5 topics
- Public Policy24▲ 15×13 topics
- Educational Technology22▲ 5.5×15 topics
- Curriculum Development21▲ 9.2×4 topics
- Sustainable Development19▲ 3.7×13 topics
- Social Inequality19▲ 21×3 topics
- Education18▲ 3.1×32 topics
- Renewable Energy16▲ 3.2×14 topics
- Waste Management15▲ 11×5 topics
- Environmental Education14▲ 27×6 topics
- Educational Policies13▲ 37×2 topics
- Inclusive Education13▲ 11×4 topics
- Distance Learning13▲ 11×3 topics
- Pedagogical Practices13▲ 43×2 topics
- Biodiversity13▲ 5.0×11 topics
- Educational Reform13▲ 31×4 topics
- Critical Pedagogy12▲ 45×1 topic
- Science Education12▲ 60×2 topics
- Data Analysis12▲ 14×3 topics
- Organizational Management12▲ 58×1 topic
- Research Methods12▲ 23×1 topic
- Digital Literacy12▲ 6.1×2 topics
- Social Network Analysis12▲ 29×2 topics
- Media Education11▲ 65×1 topic
- WebQuests11▲ 65×1 topic
- Water Resources11▲ 14×3 topics
- Eco-friendly Practices11▲ 56×1 topic
- Social Participation11▲ 54×1 topic
- Educational Games9▲ 27×2 topics
- Agroecology9▲ 18×5 topics
- Economic Analysis8▲ 18×4 topics
- Active Learning8▲ 14×2 topics
- Research8▲ 19×3 topics
- Social Movements8▲ 8.1×6 topics
- Didactic Models8▲ 60×1 topic
- Legislation8▲ 15×2 topics
- Teaching Methodologies8▲ 18×1 topic
Which research topics does International Foundation for Electoral Systems publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Education Pedagogy and Practices, Business and Management Studies, Education and Digital Technologies and Environmental Sustainability and Education.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 12 works
- 2 Business and Management Studies Information Systems and Management 12 works
- 3 Education and Digital Technologies Sociology and Political Science 11 works
- 4 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 11 works
- 5 Science and Education Research Education 8 works
- 6 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 8 works
- 7 Agricultural and Food Sciences Forestry 7 works
- 8 Linguistics and Education Research Literature and Literary Theory 6 works
- 9 Education during COVID-19 pandemic Education 5 works
- 10 Chemistry Education and Research Education 4 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has International Foundation for Electoral Systems's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 14% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is International Foundation for Electoral Systems as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0013% in 2024.
Fractional works of International Foundation for Electoral Systems over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 5.7% in 2017.
Other research institutions in Arlington
- Marymount University
- The Nature Conservancy
- RTX (United States)
- In-Q-Tel
- Industrial Research Institute
- NatureServe
- Millennium Engineering and Integration (United States)
- ENVIRON (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about International Foundation for Electoral Systems. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
