In-Q-Tel
In research, In-Q-Tel stands highest in Health Sciences (#7,001 of 11,982 worldwide), Social Sciences (#9,063 of 10,521 worldwide) and Medicine (#9,021 of 10,443 worldwide), 2022–2025.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #16,851 of 28,054 · #3,102 all time
- Rank in United States
- #2,400 of 4,192
- Research works
- 6.9k ▼ 77% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 244k 35.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 9.2% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 29% world 28%
What is In-Q-Tel known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #7,001 of 11,982 | 9.5% | 89 | #1686 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #9,063 of 10,521 | 15.0% | 70 | #2329 | |
| MedicineField | #9,021 of 10,443 | 10.1% | 66 | #1620 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #12,419 of 12,888 | 2.6% | 67 | #4108 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where In-Q-Tel sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Health Sciences#1,686 #7,001
- Social Sciences#2,329 #9,063
- Medicine#1,620 #9,021
- Physical Sciences#4,108 #12,419
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Dentistry, 6.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Dentistry 6.8×
- Health Professions 2.0×
- Neuroscience 1.8×
- Psychology 1.6×
- Social Sciences 1.4×
- Medicine 1.4×
- Nursing 1.3×
- Engineering 1.0×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.9×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.8×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.6×
- Materials Science 0.5×
- Environmental Science 0.5×
- Arts and Humanities 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.4×
- Decision Sciences 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Energy 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at In-Q-Tel?
Ranked on the composite score, Nihar Mohanty, Robert D. Clark and Shveta S Raju lead among researchers whose main affiliation is In-Q-Tel.
- 1 Nihar Mohanty · #337,083 worldwide 235 citations · 15 works
- 2 Robert D. Clark · #562,276 worldwide 120 citations · 37 works
- 3 Shveta S Raju · #717,371 worldwide 25 citations · 15 works
- 4 Peter Biolsi · #762,641 worldwide 52 citations · 20 works
- 5 Bo Sarpebakken · #1,039,655 worldwide 10 citations · 17 works
- 6 Fan · #1,070,097 worldwide 55 citations · 132 works
- 7 Kandabara Tapily · #1,092,700 worldwide 87 citations · 28 works
- 8 Daniel E. Geer · #1,092,764 worldwide 8 citations · 22 works
- 9 Akiteru Ko · #1,150,848 worldwide 25 citations · 15 works
- 10 Eric Liu · #1,286,034 worldwide 29 citations · 27 works
Which keywords describe research at In-Q-Tel?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Pedagogy, Language Teaching, Student Competencies, Teaching Methods, Epidemiology, Islam, Ethnicity and Science.
- Health Workforce
- High-k Dielectrics
- Global Governance
- Electron Beam Lithography
- Collaborative Practice
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- Hypertension
- Mortality
- Insomnia
- Health Consequences
- Primary Care
- Social Influence
- Modernization
- Culture
- Science
- History
- Meta-Analysis
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Student Competencies
- Pedagogy
- Epidemiology
- Language Teaching
- Teaching Methods
- Islam
- Ethnicity
- Circadian Rhythms
- Air Force
- Legal Regulation
- Quality of Life
- Transport Policy
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
- Psychometric Evaluation
- Sleep Duration
- Insulin Resistance
- High-Resolution Patterning
- Sleep-Disordered Breathing
- Nanofabrication
- Resolution Limits
- Atomic Layer Deposition
- Investment
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology24▲ 2.4×65 topics
- Pedagogy16▲ 13×4 topics
- Language Teaching15▲ 23×2 topics
- Student Competencies14▲ 110×1 topic
- Teaching Methods14▲ 39×1 topic
- Cardiovascular Disease9▲ 3.3×18 topics
- Islam9▲ 17×2 topics
- Meta-Analysis9▲ 5.8×13 topics
- Ethnicity8▲ 8.4×3 topics
- History8▲ 4.5×2 topics
- Circadian Rhythms8▲ 30×2 topics
- Science8▲ 12×2 topics
- Air Force8▲ 25×1 topic
- Culture8▲ 5.7×1 topic
- Legal Regulation8▲ 14×1 topic
- Modernization8▲ 16×1 topic
- Quality of Life8▲ 2.1×30 topics
- Social Influence8▲ 14×1 topic
- Transport Policy8▲ 24×1 topic
- Primary Care7▲ 7.0×9 topics
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy6▲ 18×2 topics
- Health Consequences6▲ 7.8×2 topics
- Psychometric Evaluation6▲ 25×2 topics
- Insomnia6▲ 32×1 topic
- Sleep Duration6▲ 34×1 topic
- Mortality5▲ 3.5×10 topics
- Insulin Resistance5▲ 4.4×7 topics
- Hypertension4▲ 6.2×7 topics
- High-Resolution Patterning4▲ 74×2 topics
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea4▲ 34×1 topic
- Sleep-Disordered Breathing4▲ 34×1 topic
- Collaborative Practice4▲ 34×2 topics
- Nanofabrication4▲ 23×2 topics
- Electron Beam Lithography3▲ 139×1 topic
- Resolution Limits3▲ 139×1 topic
- Global Governance3▲ 5.4×4 topics
- Atomic Layer Deposition3▲ 17×1 topic
- High-k Dielectrics3▲ 17×1 topic
- Investment3▲ 12×2 topics
- Health Workforce3▲ 25×2 topics
Which research topics does In-Q-Tel publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Education, Innovation and Language Studies, Legal and Regulatory Analysis, Military Technology and Strategies and Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education, Innovation and Language Studies Education 14 works
- 2 Legal and Regulatory Analysis Transportation 8 works
- 3 Military Technology and Strategies Aerospace Engineering 8 works
- 4 Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies Sociology and Political Science 8 works
- 5 Sleep and related disorders Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 6 works
- 6 Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research Physiology 4 works
- 7 Advancements in Photolithography Techniques Electrical and Electronic Engineering 3 works
- 8 Semiconductor materials and devices Electrical and Electronic Engineering 3 works
- 9 Economic and Industrial Development Economics and Econometrics 3 works
- 10 Nursing Roles and Practices General Health Professions 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has In-Q-Tel's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 77% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Arlington
- Marymount University
- United States Army
- The Nature Conservancy
- United States Department of the Army
- RTX (United States)
- United States Department of the Navy
- United States Air Force
- Industrial Research Institute
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.