In-Q-Tel
In research, In-Q-Tel stands highest in Health Sciences (#6,486 of 9,902 worldwide), Medicine (#5,874 of 8,541 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#8,066 of 9,585 worldwide), 2022-now.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #8,032 of 22,385 · #23,652 all time
- Rank in United States
- #1,085 of 3,332
- Research works
- 6.9k ▼ 13% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 244k 35.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 6.9% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.89× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 29% world 40%
- International
- 67% world 18%
What is In-Q-Tel known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #6,486 of 9,902 | 6.5% | 89 | #16114 | |
| MedicineField | #5,874 of 8,541 | 7.3% | 66 | #13865 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #8,066 of 9,585 | 7.8% | 70 | #14583 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #9,240 of 10,670 | 5.1% | 67 | #17397 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where In-Q-Tel sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Health Sciences#16,114 #6,486
- Medicine#13,865 #5,874
- Social Sciences#14,583 #8,066
- Physical Sciences#17,397 #9,240
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Which fields of science does In-Q-Tel work in?
In 2022-now, 33% of research at In-Q-Tel is in Social Sciences, 29% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (22%), Social Sciences (21%), Engineering (14%). It does 1.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 24 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences10133.2%
- Social Sciences6320.7%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance134.4%
- Psychology134.2%
- Business, Management and Accounting51.7%
- Arts and Humanities51.6%
- Decision Sciences20.6%
- Health Sciences9029.5%
- Medicine6621.7%
- Health Professions144.5%
- Dentistry82.7%
- Nursing20.5%
- Physical Sciences7424.4%
- Engineering4113.6%
- Computer Science165.4%
- Environmental Science72.3%
- Materials Science51.6%
- Physics and Astronomy20.7%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences10.4%
- Mathematics10.3%
- Chemistry00.1%
- Energy00.1%
- Life Sciences3912.9%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Dentistry, 5.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 24 fields, with their numbers
- Dentistry5.66×8 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance2.04×13 works
- Health Professions1.72×14 works
- Social Sciences1.64×63 works
- Neuroscience1.53×8 works
- Psychology1.37×13 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.30×19 works
- Medicine1.13×66 works
- Nursing1.08×2 works
- Engineering0.91×41 works
- Computer Science0.69×16 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.67×11 works
- Decision Sciences0.67×2 works
- Arts and Humanities0.55×5 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.53×1 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.52×5 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.48×2 works
- Environmental Science0.46×7 works
- Materials Science0.44×5 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.30×2 works
- Mathematics0.27×1 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.26×1 works
- Chemistry0.08×0 works
- Energy0.08×0 works
- Dentistry 5.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.0×
- Health Professions 1.7×
- Social Sciences 1.6×
- Neuroscience 1.5×
- Psychology 1.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.3×
- Medicine 1.1×
- Nursing 1.1×
- Engineering 0.9×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.7×
- Decision Sciences 0.7×
- Arts and Humanities 0.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.5×
- Environmental Science 0.5×
- Materials Science 0.4×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Mathematics 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.3×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Energy 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at In-Q-Tel?
Ranked on the quality score, Robert Dean Clark, Kandabara Tapily and Eric V. Liu lead among researchers whose main affiliation is In-Q-Tel.
- 1
Robert Dean Clark
United States · #3,547,866 worldwide 3k citations · 209 works
- 2
Kandabara Tapily
United States · #3,685,219 worldwide 1.8k citations · 146 works
- 3
Eric V. Liu
United States · #4,649,430 worldwide 2.1k citations · 171 works
- 4
Andrea Brennen
United States · #5,611,207 worldwide 742 citations · 15 works
- 5
Steven P. Consiglio
United States · #5,635,494 worldwide 1.2k citations · 136 works
- 6
Richard Danzig
United States · #6,267,210 worldwide 517 citations · 33 works
- 7
Kumiko Yamazaki
United States · #6,410,609 worldwide 400 citations · 24 works
- 8
Jacob Shermeyer
United States · #6,419,556 worldwide 703 citations · 18 works
- 9
Adam Van Etten
United States · #6,689,453 worldwide 1.1k citations · 16 works
- 10
Ken Burnett
United States · #7,271,069 worldwide 249 citations · 23 works
Which keywords describe research at In-Q-Tel?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Pedagogy, Language Teaching, Student Competencies, Teaching Methods, Epidemiology, Entrepreneurship, Investment and Digital Economy.
- Crisis Management
- Sleep Duration
- Psychometric Evaluation
- Global Governance
- Migration
- Transport Policy
- Legal Regulation
- Social Influence
- Science
- History
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Irrigation
- Islam
- Renewable Energy
- Industrial Enterprises
- Digital Economy
- Entrepreneurship
- Globalization
- Teaching Methods
- Language Teaching
- Pedagogy
- Student Competencies
- Epidemiology
- Sustainability
- Investment
- Economic Development
- Innovation Economics
- Climate Change Impact
- Energy Consumption
- Water Efficiency
- Ethnicity
- Meta-Analysis
- Culture
- Air Force
- Modernization
- Circadian Rhythms
- Primary Care
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
- Insomnia
- Biopolitics
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Pedagogy27▲ 18×4 topics
- Language Teaching26▲ 32×2 topics
- Student Competencies25▲ 127×1 topic
- Teaching Methods25▲ 52×1 topic
- Epidemiology24▲ 2.0×65 topics
- Globalization13▲ 2.2×8 topics
- Sustainability13▲ 1.72×11 topics
- Entrepreneurship12▲ 9.7×5 topics
- Investment11▲ 31×2 topics
- Digital Economy11▲ 18×3 topics
- Economic Development11▲ 4.5×3 topics
- Industrial Enterprises11▲ 102×1 topic
- Innovation Economics11▲ 102×1 topic
- Renewable Energy10▲ 2.4×8 topics
- Climate Change Impact10▲ 14×2 topics
- Islam10▲ 16×2 topics
- Energy Consumption10▲ 14×2 topics
- Irrigation9▲ 161×1 topic
- Water Efficiency9▲ 161×1 topic
- Cardiovascular Disease9▲ 2.7×18 topics
- Ethnicity9▲ 7.8×3 topics
- History9▲ 4.2×2 topics
- Meta-Analysis9▲ 4.8×13 topics
- Science9▲ 12×2 topics
- Culture8▲ 5.4×1 topic
- Social Influence8▲ 13×1 topic
- Air Force8▲ 23×1 topic
- Legal Regulation8▲ 12×1 topic
- Modernization8▲ 15×1 topic
- Transport Policy8▲ 22×1 topic
- Circadian Rhythms8▲ 24×2 topics
- Migration7▲ 6.4×2 topics
- Primary Care7▲ 6.0×9 topics
- Global Governance6▲ 8.6×4 topics
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy6▲ 13×2 topics
- Psychometric Evaluation6▲ 19×2 topics
- Insomnia6▲ 25×1 topic
- Sleep Duration6▲ 27×1 topic
- Biopolitics5▲ 23×2 topics
- Crisis Management5▲ 34×1 topic
Which research topics does In-Q-Tel publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Education, Innovation and Language Studies, Economic and Industrial Development, Engineering and Agricultural Innovations and Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education, Innovation and Language Studies Education 25 works
- 2 Economic and Industrial Development Economics and Econometrics 11 works
- 3 Engineering and Agricultural Innovations Aquatic Science 9 works
- 4 Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies Sociology and Political Science 8 works
- 5 Military Technology and Strategies Aerospace Engineering 8 works
- 6 Legal and Regulatory Analysis Transportation 8 works
- 7 Sleep and related disorders Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 6 works
- 8 Medical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies Political Science and International Relations 5 works
- 9 Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research Physiology 4 works
- 10 Advancements in Photolithography Techniques Electrical and Electronic Engineering 4 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has In-Q-Tel's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 13% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is In-Q-Tel as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00086% in 2024.
Fractional works of In-Q-Tel over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 27.3% in 1991.
Other research institutions in Arlington
- Marymount University
- The Nature Conservancy
- RTX (United States)
- Industrial Research Institute
- NatureServe
- Millennium Engineering and Integration (United States)
- International Foundation for Electoral Systems
- ENVIRON (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about In-Q-Tel. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
