Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Charlottesville · United States

Empirical Technologies (United States)

empiricaltechnologies.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
50
▲ 20% vs 2018-21
Citations
319
6.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
7.9%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
60%
world 40%
International
28%
world 18%
Empirical Technologies (United States)

Not ranked overall: Empirical Technologies (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Empirical Technologies (United States) work in?

In all years, 48% of research at Empirical Technologies (United States) is in Social Sciences, 27% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (27%), Medicine (20%), Engineering (14%). It does 2.0× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 24 fractional works · 48.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 13 fractional works · 27.0% of its workEducation: 7 fractional works · 14.7% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 4.9% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workLaw: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPublic Administration: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 3 fractional works · 6.4% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workAccounting: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 3 fractional works · 5.2% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 3.4% of its workFinance: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workDecision Sciences: 2 fractional works · 4.5% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workGeneral Decision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 2 fractional works · 3.2% of its workPhilosophy: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workMusic: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 14 fractional works · 27.3% of its workEngineering: 7 fractional works · 14.3% of its workMechanical Engineering: 3 fractional works · 6.0% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 3 fractional works · 5.2% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 4 fractional works · 9.0% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workComputer Science Applications: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workStatistics and Probability: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workModeling and Simulation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workOceanography: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAtmospheric Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workGeneral Energy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 11 fractional works · 21.7% of its workMedicine: 10 fractional works · 19.9% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 2 fractional works · 4.9% of its workPharmacology: 2 fractional works · 4.1% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDevelopmental Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKEmpiricalTechnologies…50fractional works, all years
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences27%Health Sciences22%Social Sciences48%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1327.0%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting36.4%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance35.2%
    4. Decision Sciences24.5%
    5. Arts and Humanities23.2%
    6. Psychology12.2%
    1. Engineering714.3%
    2. Computer Science49.0%
    3. Mathematics11.8%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences11.7%
    5. Energy00.2%
    6. Materials Science00.2%
    1. Medicine1019.9%
    2. Nursing11.2%
    3. Health Professions00.6%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology11.1%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.8%
    3. Neuroscience00.7%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 0.47× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 2.77× its world share, 3 worksComputer ScienceEnergy: 0.82× its world share, 0 worksEnergyMedicine: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.78× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 4.98× its world share, 2 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 3.91× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.94× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.74× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.60× its world share, 7 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Business, Management and Accounting, 5.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 11 fields, with their numbers
  1. Business, Management and Accounting4.98×2 works
  2. Decision Sciences3.91×1 works
  3. Social Sciences3.60×7 works
  4. Computer Science2.77×3 works
  5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.94×1 works
  6. Energy0.82×0 works
  7. Arts and Humanities0.78×0 works
  8. Psychology0.74×0 works
  9. Neuroscience0.47×0 works
  10. Medicine0.13×0 works
  11. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.08×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Empirical Technologies (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, David W. Gerdt and Anietie Imo Effiong lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Empirical Technologies (United States).

  1. 1 David W. Gerdt United States · #3,211,606 worldwide 257 citations · 18 works
  2. 2 Anietie Imo Effiong United States · #4,455,801 worldwide 6 citations · 31 works
All ranked researchers at Empirical Technologies (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Empirical Technologies (United States)?

The most cited paper from Empirical Technologies (United States) is "Pulse Decomposition Analysis of the digital arterial pulse during hemorrhage simulation" (Martin C. Baruch, Darren E. R. Warburton, Shannon S. D. Bredin et al., 2011), with 145 citations. Next come "Continuous Non-invasive finger cuff CareTaker® comparable to invasive intra-arterial pressure in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery" (72) and "Validation of the pulse decomposition analysis algorithm using central arterial blood pressure" (53).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Pulse Decomposition Analysis of the digital arterial pulse during hemorrhage simulation Martin C. Baruch, Darren E. R. Warburton, Shannon S. D. Bredin et al. · Nonlinear Biomedical Physics Open access 12 Jan 2011 145
2 Continuous Non-invasive finger cuff CareTaker® comparable to invasive intra-arterial pressure in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery Irwin Gratz, Edward R. Deal, Francis J. Spitz et al. · BMC Anesthesiology Open access 21 Mar 2017 72
3 Validation of the pulse decomposition analysis algorithm using central arterial blood pressure Martin C. Baruch, Kambiz Kalantari, David W. Gerdt et al. · BioMedical Engineering OnLine Open access 2014 53
4 The incantations of the EU organised crime policy making Petrus C. van Duyne, T. Vander Beken · Crime Law and Social Change 10 Oct 2008 51
5 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Alabama Math, Science, and Technology Initiative (AMSTI) Denis G. Newman, Pamela B. Finney, Steve Bell et al. · SSRN Electronic Journal PreprintOpen access 2012 28
All 72 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Empirical Technologies (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Low Back Pain, Artificial Intelligence, Educational Technology, Technology Integration, E-Learning, Student Achievement, Intervertebral Disc and Lumbar Disc Degeneration.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Low Back Pain4▲ 50×2 topics
  2. Artificial Intelligence4▲ 9.5×6 topics
  3. Educational Technology4▲ 10×5 topics
  4. Technology Integration3▲ 29×4 topics
  5. Deep Learning2▲ 2.1×3 topics
  6. E-Learning2▲ 7.8×3 topics
  7. Chronic Pain2▲ 18×2 topics
  8. Global Burden2▲ 7.7×2 topics
  9. Intervertebral Disc2▲ 65×1 topic
  10. Lumbar Disc Degeneration2▲ 65×1 topic
  11. Student Achievement2▲ 48×3 topics
  12. Digital Transformation2▲ 15×4 topics
  13. Disability2▲ 42×1 topic
  14. Measurement Properties2▲ 58×1 topic
  15. Education2▲ 3.0×9 topics
  16. Complexity Theory2▲ 65×2 topics
  17. Ethics2▲ 7.7×5 topics
  18. Professional Learning Communities2▲ 78×2 topics
  19. Spine Segmentation2▲ 146×1 topic
  20. Vertebrae Detection2▲ 146×1 topic
  21. Social Justice2▲ 7.0×4 topics
  22. Sustainable Development2▲ 3.0×4 topics
  23. Heart Rate Variability2▲ 27×2 topics
  24. Mobile Learning2▲ 21×2 topics
  25. Google Classroom1▲ 71×1 topic
  26. Health Education1▲ 12×2 topics
  27. Online Learning1▲ 6.0×1 topic
  28. Pedagogy1▲ 7.4×3 topics
  29. Philosophy1▲ 5.9×3 topics
  30. STEM Education1▲ 9.6×5 topics
  31. Data Use1▲ 250×1 topic
  32. Educational Improvement1▲ 250×1 topic
  33. Inclusive Education1▲ 11×3 topics
  34. Lifelong Learning1▲ 15×2 topics
  35. Professional Development1▲ 15×3 topics
  36. Composite Springs1▲ 66×1 topic
  37. Distributed Systems1▲ 8.2×1 topic
  38. Environmental Participation1▲ 22×1 topic
  39. Failure Analysis1▲ 15×1 topic
  40. Fracture Mechanisms1▲ 154×1 topic

Which research topics does Empirical Technologies (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Technology-Enhanced Education Studies, Educational Leadership and Innovation, E-Learning and COVID-19 and Scientific Research and Technology.

Technology-Enhanced Educ…1Technology-Enhanced Education Studies: 1 fractional worksEducational Leadership and Innovation: 1 fractional worksE-Learning and COVID-19: 1 fractional worksScientific Research and Technology: 1 fractional worksEthics and Social Impacts of AI: 0 fractional worksLaw, AI, and Intellectua…0Law, AI, and Intellectual Property: 0 fractional worksDiverse Musicological Studies: 0 fractional worksInternational Labor and Employment Law: 0 fractional worksLabor Movements and Unions: 0 fractional worksTeaching and Learning Programming: 0 fractional works
EducationComputer Science ApplicationsSafety ResearchArtificial Intelligence3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Technology-Enhanced Education Studies Education 1 works
  2. 2 Educational Leadership and Innovation Education 1 works
  3. 3 E-Learning and COVID-19 Education 1 works
  4. 4 Scientific Research and Technology Computer Science Applications 1 works
  5. 5 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 0 works
  6. 6 Law, AI, and Intellectual Property Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  7. 7 Diverse Musicological Studies Music 0 works
  8. 8 International Labor and Employment Law Political Science and International Relations 0 works
  9. 9 Labor Movements and Unions Public Administration 0 works
  10. 10 Teaching and Learning Programming Computer Science Applications 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available60.0%not open40.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors28.5%domestic only71.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Empirical Technologies (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 20% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Empirical Technologies (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000021% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%Empirical Technologies (United States)0.000047% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Empirical Technologies (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Charlottesville

All research institutions in Charlottesville

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Empirical Technologies (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.