Hersenstichting
In research, Hersenstichting stands highest in Health Sciences (#4,594 of 16,688 worldwide) and Medicine (#4,214 of 14,558 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #11,868 of 34,923
- Rank in Netherlands
- #175 of 407
- Research works
- 368 ▼ 17% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 14k 37.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 14.4% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.17× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 49% world 40%
- International
- 30% world 18%
What is Hersenstichting known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #4,594 of 16,688 | 14.5% | 178 | |
| MedicineField | #4,214 of 14,558 | 14.4% | 161 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Hersenstichting sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Hersenstichting work in?
In 2022-now, 44% of research at Hersenstichting is in Health Sciences, 21% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (38%), Psychology (7%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (7%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Health Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 24 fields, with their numbers
- Health Sciences2844.0%
- Medicine2438.0%
- Health Professions23.9%
- Nursing11.3%
- Dentistry00.4%
- Veterinary00.4%
- Social Sciences1320.9%
- Life Sciences1218.4%
- Physical Sciences1016.7%
- Computer Science46.1%
- Environmental Science35.1%
- Engineering23.4%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences00.7%
- Physics and Astronomy00.7%
- Energy00.5%
- Mathematics00.2%
- Chemistry00.1%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Neuroscience, 4.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 24 fields, with their numbers
- Neuroscience4.22×4 works
- Nursing2.63×1 works
- Veterinary2.57×0 works
- Psychology2.41×5 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.36×0 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance2.13×3 works
- Medicine1.98×24 works
- Health Professions1.49×2 works
- Decision Sciences1.35×1 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.29×4 works
- Environmental Science1.02×3 works
- Immunology and Microbiology1.00×1 works
- Dentistry0.89×0 works
- Arts and Humanities0.84×2 works
- Computer Science0.79×4 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.59×2 works
- Energy0.58×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.45×0 works
- Social Sciences0.34×3 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.30×0 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.27×0 works
- Engineering0.22×2 works
- Mathematics0.15×0 works
- Chemistry0.05×0 works
- Neuroscience 4.2×
- Nursing 2.6×
- Veterinary 2.6×
- Psychology 2.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.4×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.1×
- Medicine 2.0×
- Health Professions 1.5×
- Decision Sciences 1.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.3×
- Environmental Science 1.0×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.0×
- Dentistry 0.9×
- Arts and Humanities 0.8×
- Computer Science 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.6×
- Energy 0.6×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.5×
- Social Sciences 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Hersenstichting?
Ranked on the quality score, Ineke van Dis, Rivka Ravid and Jane M. Meijlink lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Hersenstichting.
- 1
Ineke van Dis
Netherlands · #273,175 worldwide 24k citations · 52 works
- 2
Rivka Ravid
Netherlands · #341,411 worldwide 21k citations · 235 works
- 3
Jane M. Meijlink
Netherlands · #895,131 worldwide 1.8k citations · 49 works
- 4
Gladys R.J. Zandwijken
Netherlands · #902,029 worldwide 1.4k citations · 26 works
- 5
Gert de Graaf
Netherlands · #956,888 worldwide 1.4k citations · 34 works
- 6
Elbrich P. C. Siemensma
Netherlands · #1,641,958 worldwide 889 citations · 17 works
- 7
Annemieke J. Lem
Netherlands · #2,434,276 worldwide 361 citations · 18 works
- 8
Ruud Bronkhorst
Netherlands · #2,816,921 worldwide 11 citations · 31 works
- 9
Rinke van den Brink
Netherlands · #3,343,809 worldwide 37 citations · 21 works
- 10
Jean-Paul Close
Netherlands · #3,534,479 worldwide 138 citations · 24 works
Which keywords describe research at Hersenstichting?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Neuroimaging, Neurological Disorders, Climate Change, Functional Connectivity, Energy Transition, Medical Applications and Quality of Life.
- Shape Matching
- Content-Based Image Retrieval
- Treatment
- Risk Factors
- Population Dynamics
- Ethical Considerations
- Default Mode Network
- Medical Applications
- Functional Connectivity
- Depression
- Neuroimaging
- Deep Learning
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Quality of Life
- Neurological Disorders
- Machine Learning
- Mental Health
- Energy Transition
- Brain Development
- Education
- Inflammation
- Resting-State fMRI
- Biomarkers
- Brain Connectivity
- Public Health
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 26 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 26 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology4▲ 1.78×38 topics
- Climate Change3▲ 1.88×13 topics
- Quality of Life2▲ 2.5×14 topics
- Deep Learning2◆ 0.95×12 topics
- Neurological Disorders2▲ 5.6×9 topics
- Neuroimaging2▲ 11×7 topics
- Machine Learning2▼ 0.84×8 topics
- Depression2▲ 3.2×12 topics
- Mental Health2▲ 1.80×12 topics
- Functional Connectivity1▲ 17×3 topics
- Energy Transition1▲ 14×2 topics
- Medical Applications1▲ 29×2 topics
- Brain Development1▲ 11×5 topics
- Default Mode Network1▲ 25×1 topic
- Education1◆ 1.09×4 topics
- Ethical Considerations1▲ 5.4×6 topics
- Inflammation1◆ 0.88×14 topics
- Population Dynamics1▲ 7.4×8 topics
- Resting-State fMRI1▲ 25×1 topic
- Risk Factors1▲ 1.82×10 topics
- Biomarkers1▲ 2.5×5 topics
- Treatment1▲ 1.44×9 topics
- Brain Connectivity1▲ 17×2 topics
- Content-Based Image Retrieval1▲ 59×1 topic
- Public Health1◆ 1.13×12 topics
- Shape Matching1▲ 59×1 topic
Which research topics does Hersenstichting publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications and Climate Change Policy and Economics.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Functional Brain Connectivity Studies Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works
- 2 Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1 works
- 3 Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1 works
- 4 Climate Change Policy and Economics Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 5 Family and Disability Support Research Clinical Psychology 1 works
- 6 Down syndrome and intellectual disability research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 7 Uterine Myomas and Treatments Obstetrics and Gynecology 1 works
- 8 Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research Psychiatry and Mental health 1 works
- 9 Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1 works
- 10 Disability Rights and Representation Safety Research 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Hersenstichting's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 17% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Hersenstichting as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00026% in 2024.
Fractional works of Hersenstichting over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in The Hague
- Shell (Netherlands)
- House of Representatives
- The Hague University of Applied Sciences
- Medisch Centrum Haaglanden
- Haga Hospital
- Netherlands Institute for Social Research
- Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
- CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Hersenstichting. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
