Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Hospital / health system · Rosenheim · Germany

Inn-Salzach-Klinikum

In research, Inn-Salzach-Klinikum stands highest in Health Sciences (#9,807 of 16,688 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#21,503
of 34,923
Rank in Germany
#1,055
of 1,603
Research works
262
▲ 61% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.8k
6.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
4.7%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.97×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
12%
world 40%
International
8%
world 18%

What is Inn-Salzach-Klinikum known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Health SciencesDomain #9,807 of 16,688 5.1%123

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Inn-Salzach-Klinikum sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Inn-Salzach-Klinikum work in?

In 2022-now, 47% of research at Inn-Salzach-Klinikum is in Health Sciences, 29% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (42%), Psychology (19%), Neuroscience (9%). It does 1.8× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 19 fractional works · 47.2% of its workMedicine: 17 fractional works · 42.0% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 4 fractional works · 9.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 2 fractional works · 5.1% of its workPharmacology: 2 fractional works · 5.0% of its workNeurology: 2 fractional works · 3.9% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workFamily Practice: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Informatics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workTransplantation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 5.3% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 2 fractional works · 4.0% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 12 fractional works · 29.2% of its workPsychology: 8 fractional works · 18.8% of its workClinical Psychology: 5 fractional works · 12.2% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 7.1% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workCommunication: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLife Sciences: 7 fractional works · 16.9% of its workNeuroscience: 4 fractional works · 9.0% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 2 fractional works · 4.4% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workDevelopmental Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSensory Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 5.7% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workBiochemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDevelopmental Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workToxicology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 6.6% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 4.3% of its workComputational Mechanics: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKInn-Salzach-Klinikum41fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences17%Physical Sciences7%Health Sciences47%Social Sciences29%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 16 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine1742.0%
    2. Health Professions25.3%
    1. Psychology818.8%
    2. Social Sciences37.1%
    3. Arts and Humanities11.6%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting11.3%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.4%
    1. Neuroscience49.0%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology25.7%
    3. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics01.1%
    4. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.9%
    5. Immunology and Microbiology00.2%
    1. Engineering24.3%
    2. Computer Science11.4%
    3. Environmental Science00.8%
    4. Physics and Astronomy00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.08× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 5.57× its world share, 4 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 3.08× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 0.18× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.29× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 2.00× its world share, 2 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.18× its world share, 17 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.55× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.40× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 6.17× its world share, 8 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.56× its world share, 3 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 6.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 16 fields, with their numbers
  1. Psychology6.17×8 works
  2. Neuroscience5.57×4 works
  3. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics3.08×0 works
  4. Medicine2.18×17 works
  5. Health Professions2.00×2 works
  6. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.08×2 works
  7. Social Sciences0.56×3 works
  8. Arts and Humanities0.55×1 works
  9. Business, Management and Accounting0.40×0 works
  10. Engineering0.29×2 works
  11. Immunology and Microbiology0.20×0 works
  12. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.19×0 works
  13. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.19×0 works
  14. Computer Science0.18×1 works
  15. Environmental Science0.16×0 works
  16. Physics and Astronomy0.03×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Inn-Salzach-Klinikum?

Ranked on the quality score, Julia Diemer, Verena Caroline Buschert and Gerd Laux lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Inn-Salzach-Klinikum.

  1. 1 Julia Diemer Germany · #1,399,682 worldwide 2.3k citations · 51 works
  2. 2 Verena Caroline Buschert Germany · #2,157,892 worldwide 663 citations · 94 works
  3. 3 Gerd Laux Germany · #2,675,955 worldwide 8.5k citations · 604 works
  4. 4 Mirijam Fric Germany · #3,113,758 worldwide 1.1k citations · 21 works
  5. 5 Wolfgang von der Weppen Germany · #3,331,689 worldwide 11 citations · 21 works
  6. 6 Kajetan Zwirglmaier Germany · #3,375,118 worldwide 9 citations · 17 works
  7. 7 Gerhard Laux Germany · #3,672,033 worldwide 917 citations · 60 works
  8. 8 Sarah Zwick Germany · #4,149,374 worldwide 173 citations · 16 works
  9. 9 Alexander Brunnauer Germany · #4,357,442 worldwide 945 citations · 93 works
  10. 10 Swantje Notzon Germany · #4,436,887 worldwide 591 citations · 37 works
All ranked researchers at Inn-Salzach-Klinikum

What are the most cited papers from Inn-Salzach-Klinikum?

The most cited paper from Inn-Salzach-Klinikum is "The AGNP-TDM Expert Group Consensus Guidelines: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Psychiatry" (Pierre Baumann, Christoph Hiemke, Sven Ulrich et al., 2004), with 422 citations. Next come "Biological markers for anxiety disorders, OCD and PTSD: A consensus statement. Part II: Neurochemistry, neurophysiology and neurocognition" (345) and "The AGNP-TDM Expert Group Consensus Guidelines: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Psychiatry" (343).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The AGNP-TDM Expert Group Consensus Guidelines: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Psychiatry Pierre Baumann, Christoph Hiemke, Sven Ulrich et al. · Pharmacopsychiatry Nov 2004 422
2 Biological markers for anxiety disorders, OCD and PTSD: A consensus statement. Part II: Neurochemistry, neurophysiology and neurocognition Borwin Bandelow et al. · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry Open access 15 Jul 2016 345
3 The AGNP-TDM Expert Group Consensus Guidelines: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Psychiatry I. Gaertner, Pierre Baumann, Christoph Hiemke et al. · Pharmacopsychiatry 25 Jan 2005 343
4 Response and remission criteria in major depression – A validation of current practice Michael J Riedel, Hans‐Jürgen Möller, Michael Obermeier et al. · Journal of Psychiatric Research 6 May 2010 290
5 Prediction of Individual Response to Electroconvulsive Therapy via Machine Learning on Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Ronny Redlich, Nils Opel, Dominik Grotegerd et al. · JAMA Psychiatry 4 May 2016 279
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Inn-Salzach-Klinikum?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Depression, Cognitive Impairment, Synaptic Plasticity, Neuroimaging, Emotion Regulation, Aging, Neurological Disorders and Caregiver Burden.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 36 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 36 words, with their numbers
  1. Depression3▲ 8.0×9 topics
  2. Epidemiology3▲ 1.71×11 topics
  3. Cognitive Impairment3▲ 25×5 topics
  4. Synaptic Plasticity2▲ 26×3 topics
  5. Emotion Regulation2▲ 15×6 topics
  6. Neuroimaging2▲ 18×6 topics
  7. Aging2▲ 8.8×3 topics
  8. Neurological Disorders2▲ 7.7×8 topics
  9. Caregiver Burden2▲ 35×2 topics
  10. Neurobiological Correlates2▲ 38×3 topics
  11. Neurobiological Mechanisms2▲ 93×2 topics
  12. Neurobiology2▲ 15×6 topics
  13. Alzheimer's Disease2▲ 13×2 topics
  14. Genetics2▲ 5.2×6 topics
  15. Biomarkers1▲ 5.0×3 topics
  16. Dementia1▲ 35×1 topic
  17. Mild Cognitive Impairment1▲ 39×1 topic
  18. Oxidative Stress1▲ 2.1×8 topics
  19. Treatment-Resistant Depression1▲ 51×2 topics
  20. Antidepressant1▲ 129×1 topic
  21. Clinical Guidelines1▲ 11×2 topics
  22. Crisis Resolution1▲ 233×1 topic
  23. Home Treatment1▲ 233×1 topic
  24. Integrated Care1▲ 75×2 topics
  25. Ketamine1▲ 129×1 topic
  26. Psychopathology1▲ 19×4 topics
  27. Anxiety1▲ 6.3×6 topics
  28. Inflammation1▲ 1.33×5 topics
  29. Mental Health1▲ 1.81×10 topics
  30. Neural Circuits1▲ 29×3 topics
  31. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes1▲ 14×3 topics
  32. Risk Factors1▲ 2.5×7 topics
  33. Treatment1▲ 2.2×6 topics
  34. Cognitive Therapy1▲ 22×3 topics
  35. Mental Disorders1▲ 22×3 topics
  36. Renewable Resources1▲ 14×2 topics

Which research topics does Inn-Salzach-Klinikum publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Psychiatric care and mental health services, Treatment of Major Depression and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes.

  1. 1 Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research Psychiatry and Mental health 1 works
  2. 2 Psychiatric care and mental health services Clinical Psychology 1 works
  3. 3 Treatment of Major Depression Pharmacology 1 works
  4. 4 Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1 works
  5. 5 Personality Disorders and Psychopathology Clinical Psychology 1 works
  6. 6 Memory and Neural Mechanisms Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works
  7. 7 Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments Psychiatry and Mental health 1 works
  8. 8 Environmental Science and Technology Biochemistry 1 works
  9. 9 Economic and Social Issues Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  10. 10 Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available12.1%not open87.9%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors7.6%domestic only92.4%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Inn-Salzach-Klinikum's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 61% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Inn-Salzach-Klinikum as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00014% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%Inn-Salzach-Klinikum0.00011% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Inn-Salzach-Klinikum over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Rosenheim

All research institutions in Rosenheim

Share Inn-Salzach-Klinikum's ranking

Inn-Salzach-Klinikum on Science Explorer

A card with Inn-Salzach-Klinikum's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Inn-Salzach-Klinikum. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.