International House
In research, International House stands highest in Health Sciences (#9,139 of 16,688 worldwide), Medicine (#8,312 of 14,558 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#9,366 of 14,833 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #17,589 of 22,385 · #10,822 all time
- Rank in Portugal
- #144 of 168
- Research works
- 570 ▲ 65% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 6.9k 12.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 7.5% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.92× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 50% world 40%
- International
- 42% world 18%
What is International House known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #9,139 of 16,688 | 8.0% | 155 | |
| MedicineField | #8,312 of 14,558 | 7.8% | 124 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #9,366 of 14,833 | 7.7% | 251 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #12,233 of 17,446 | 9.6% | 126 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where International House sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does International House work in?
In 2022-now, 56% of research at International House is in Social Sciences, 23% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (23%), Business, Management and Accounting (12%), Medicine (10%). It does 2.2× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 25 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences8656.5%
- Social Sciences3623.3%
- Business, Management and Accounting1912.4%
- Psychology138.5%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance74.3%
- Arts and Humanities64.2%
- Decision Sciences63.9%
- Physical Sciences3522.8%
- Computer Science138.3%
- Environmental Science95.8%
- Engineering95.7%
- Chemistry21.3%
- Mathematics10.9%
- Physics and Astronomy10.5%
- Materials Science00.2%
- Energy00.1%
- Chemical Engineering00.1%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences00.1%
- Health Sciences2214.3%
- Medicine1610.3%
- Health Professions42.6%
- Dentistry10.8%
- Nursing10.7%
- Life Sciences106.4%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 4.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 25 fields, with their numbers
- Decision Sciences4.00×6 works
- Business, Management and Accounting3.84×19 works
- Psychology2.78×13 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance2.00×6 works
- Social Sciences1.84×36 works
- Dentistry1.58×1 works
- Arts and Humanities1.47×6 works
- Nursing1.34×1 works
- Environmental Science1.17×9 works
- Computer Science1.07×13 works
- Health Professions0.99×4 works
- Neuroscience0.84×2 works
- Chemistry0.80×2 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.72×5 works
- Mathematics0.72×1 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.62×0 works
- Medicine0.54×16 works
- Engineering0.38×9 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.25×2 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.23×1 works
- Chemical Engineering0.16×0 works
- Energy0.12×0 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.06×0 works
- Materials Science0.06×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.03×0 works
- Decision Sciences 4.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting 3.8×
- Psychology 2.8×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.0×
- Social Sciences 1.8×
- Dentistry 1.6×
- Arts and Humanities 1.5×
- Nursing 1.3×
- Environmental Science 1.2×
- Computer Science 1.1×
- Health Professions 1.0×
- Neuroscience 0.8×
- Chemistry 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.7×
- Mathematics 0.7×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.6×
- Medicine 0.5×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Chemical Engineering 0.2×
- Energy 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at International House?
Ranked on the quality score, Marc-Felix Otto, Maurice A. Cassidy and William Henry Jones lead among researchers whose main affiliation is International House.
- 1
Marc-Felix Otto
Portugal · #2,226,416 worldwide 274 citations · 34 works
- 2
Maurice A. Cassidy
Portugal · #2,797,448 worldwide 403 citations · 53 works
- 3
William Henry Jones
Portugal · #3,304,010 worldwide 4 citations · 15 works
- 4
Tony Duff
Portugal · #4,277,577 worldwide 30 citations · 15 works
- 5
Tony Graham
Portugal · #4,342,424 worldwide 393 citations · 46 works
- 6
Pekka Haavisto
Portugal · #4,566,592 worldwide 63 citations · 30 works
Which keywords describe research at International House?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Corporate Governance, Leadership, Human Rights, Organizational Performance, Firm Performance, Business Strategy, Criminal Justice and Supply Chain Management.
- Organizational Behavior
- Child Protection
- Information Systems
- Environmental Law
- Digitalization
- Neuroscience
- Legal Framework
- Customer Relationship Management
- Restorative Justice
- Organizational Culture
- Risk Management
- Governance
- Teacher Training
- Organizational Performance
- Criminal Justice
- Healthcare
- Economic Growth
- Leadership
- Climate Change
- Machine Learning
- Corporate Governance
- Human Rights
- Globalization
- Supply Chain Management
- Innovation
- Business Strategy
- Firm Performance
- Financial Performance
- Digital Transformation
- Health
- Corporate Lobbying
- Political Connections
- Job Satisfaction
- Information Technology
- User Satisfaction
- Customer Satisfaction
- Professional Development
- Structural Equation Modeling
- Technology Acceptance Model
- Juvenile Justice
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Corporate Governance7▲ 6.5×9 topics
- Machine Learning7▲ 1.36×18 topics
- Human Rights7▲ 4.3×12 topics
- Climate Change6▲ 1.48×23 topics
- Globalization6▲ 1.95×20 topics
- Leadership6▲ 7.8×11 topics
- Supply Chain Management5▲ 3.4×8 topics
- Economic Growth4▲ 3.3×7 topics
- Innovation4▲ 2.5×11 topics
- Healthcare4▲ 2.2×9 topics
- Business Strategy4▲ 56×3 topics
- Criminal Justice4▲ 11×4 topics
- Firm Performance4▲ 14×2 topics
- Organizational Performance4▲ 9.4×7 topics
- Financial Performance4▲ 4.2×6 topics
- Teacher Training3▲ 3.5×6 topics
- Digital Transformation3▲ 3.9×7 topics
- Governance3▲ 6.5×6 topics
- Health3▲ 5.3×8 topics
- Risk Management3▲ 4.4×5 topics
- Corporate Lobbying3▲ 165×1 topic
- Organizational Culture3▲ 5.1×4 topics
- Political Connections3▲ 165×1 topic
- Restorative Justice3▲ 14×2 topics
- Job Satisfaction3▲ 4.4×5 topics
- Customer Relationship Management3▲ 13×2 topics
- Information Technology3▲ 3.7×4 topics
- Legal Framework3▲ 17×2 topics
- User Satisfaction3▲ 9.2×3 topics
- Neuroscience3▲ 5.6×7 topics
- Customer Satisfaction2▲ 5.2×3 topics
- Digitalization2▲ 7.7×4 topics
- Professional Development2▲ 7.6×4 topics
- Environmental Law2▲ 7.4×2 topics
- Structural Equation Modeling2▲ 7.7×2 topics
- Information Systems2▲ 8.4×1 topic
- Technology Acceptance Model2▲ 9.4×1 topic
- Child Protection2▲ 20×1 topic
- Juvenile Justice2▲ 20×1 topic
- Organizational Behavior2▲ 8.5×2 topics
Which research topics does International House publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Political Influence and Corporate Strategies, Technology Adoption and User Behaviour, Legal and Social Justice Studies and Organizational and Employee Performance.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Political Influence and Corporate Strategies Strategy and Management 3 works
- 2 Technology Adoption and User Behaviour Information Systems and Management 2 works
- 3 Legal and Social Justice Studies Law 2 works
- 4 Organizational and Employee Performance Artificial Intelligence 2 works
- 5 Corporate Governance and Management Strategy and Management 2 works
- 6 Digital Marketing and Social Media Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 7 Coaching Methods and Impact Applied Psychology 1 works
- 8 History of Science and Natural History History and Philosophy of Science 1 works
- 9 Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 10 Insurance and Financial Risk Management Economics and Econometrics 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has International House's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 65% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is International House as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00030% in 2024.
Fractional works of International House over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Lisbon
- University of Lisbon
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa
- Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers
- Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa
- Universidade Católica Portuguesa
- Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
- Universidade Lusófona
- Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about International House. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
