Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Princeton · United States

Learning Ally

learningally.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
7
fractional, all time
Citations
54
7.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
1.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
24%
world 40%
International
46%
world 18%
Learning Ally

Not ranked overall: Learning Ally is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Learning Ally work in?

In all years, 63% of research at Learning Ally is in Social Sciences, 24% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (40%), Computer Science (24%), Psychology (19%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 4 fractional works · 63.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 39.8% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 18.7% of its workCommunication: 1 fractional works · 9.8% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 0 fractional works · 7.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 4.1% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 18.7% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 13.7% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 4.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 23.5% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 23.5% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 1 fractional works · 9.8% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 7.3% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 4.1% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 10.5% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 7.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workALL ITS WORKLearning Ally7fractional works, all years
Life Sciences2%Physical Sciences24%Health Sciences11%Social Sciences63%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 8 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences339.8%
    2. Psychology118.7%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting02.5%
    4. Decision Sciences02.5%
    1. Computer Science223.5%
    1. Medicine07.3%
    2. Health Professions03.2%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology02.5%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

    Who are the top researchers at Learning Ally?

    Ranked on the quality score, Beverly Trayner and John D. Smith lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Learning Ally.

    1. 1 Beverly Trayner United States · #3,600,430 worldwide 691 citations · 17 works
    2. 2 John D. Smith United States · #3,962,666 worldwide 127 citations · 18 works
    All ranked researchers at Learning Ally

    What are the most cited papers from Learning Ally?

    The most cited paper from Learning Ally is "Building Sustainable Communities of Practice" (Bronwyn Stuckey, John D. Smith, 2004), with 46 citations. Next come "Adding connectivity and losing context with ICT: Contrasting learning situations from a community of practice perspective" (15) and "Participation in International Virtual Learning Communities" (9).

    Most cited papers
    #PaperReleasedCitations
    1 Building Sustainable Communities of Practice Bronwyn Stuckey, John D. Smith · IGI Global eBooks Book chapter 2004 46
    2 Adding connectivity and losing context with ICT: Contrasting learning situations from a community of practice perspective Patricia H. Arnold, John D. Smith · Communities and Technologies Book chapter 2003 15
    3 Participation in International Virtual Learning Communities Beverly Trayner, John D. Smith, Marco Cesare Bettoni · Lecture notes in business information processing Book chapter 2007 9
    4 Narrative Patricia H. Arnold, John D. Smith, Beverly Trayner · IGI Global eBooks Book chapter 24 May 2011 8
    5 Online course design from a communities-of-practice perspective John D. Smith, Beverly Trayner · eLearn Sep 2006 3
    All 10 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

    Which research topics does Learning Ally publish most on?

    By volume: Online and Blended Learning, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Innovative Education and Learning Practices and Knowledge Management and Sharing.

    Online and Blended Learn…1Online and Blended Learning: 1 fractional worksInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods: 1 fractional worksInnovative Education and Learning Practices: 0 fractional worksKnowledge Management and…0Knowledge Management and Sharing: 0 fractional worksPeer-to-Peer Network Tec…0Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies: 0 fractional worksCaching and Content Deli…0Caching and Content Delivery: 0 fractional worksTeam Dynamics and Performance: 0 fractional worksService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services: 0 fractional worksInnovative Human-Technology Interaction: 0 fractional worksPharmacology and Obesity Treatment: 0 fractional works
    EducationDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyHuman Factors and ErgonomicsCommunication5 others

    Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

    1. 1 Online and Blended Learning Education 1 works
    2. 2 Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods Developmental and Educational Psychology 1 works
    3. 3 Innovative Education and Learning Practices Human Factors and Ergonomics 0 works
    4. 4 Knowledge Management and Sharing Communication 0 works
    5. 5 Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies Computer Networks and Communications 0 works
    6. 6 Caching and Content Delivery Computer Networks and Communications 0 works
    7. 7 Team Dynamics and Performance Social Psychology 0 works
    8. 8 Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services Information Systems 0 works
    9. 9 Innovative Human-Technology Interaction Human-Computer Interaction 0 works
    10. 10 Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment Pharmacology 0 works

    How open and international is its research?

    Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

    openly available24.4%not open75.6%

    World: 40% of research is openly available.

    with international co-authors46.3%domestic only53.7%

    World: 18% is written across borders.

    How has Learning Ally's research output changed?

    200520102015
    grewheldshrank

    The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

    Other research institutions in Princeton

    All research institutions in Princeton

    Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

    Discussion

    Ask a question or share a note about Learning Ally. Posts are plain text and can be reported.