Mathematica Policy Research
In research, Mathematica Policy Research stands highest in Social Sciences (#6,695 of 10,521 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#9,440 of 11,982 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in General Health Professions and Health Professions — General Health Professions is 13.4× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #14,844 of 28,054 · #6,566 all time
- Rank in United States
- #2,085 of 4,192
- Research works
- 1.6k ▼ 21% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 49k 30.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 25.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 34% world 28%
What is Mathematica Policy Research known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #6,695 of 10,521 | 27.9% | 87 | #1802 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #9,440 of 11,982 | 21.7% | 80 | #1920 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Mathematica Policy Research sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Mathematica Policy Research specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: General Health Professions takes 13.4× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- General Health ProfessionsSubfield · 34.9 works13×
- Health ProfessionsField · 38.7 works7.8×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 7.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 7.8×
- Mathematics 5.0×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3.5×
- Psychology 3.5×
- Decision Sciences 2.1×
- Social Sciences 1.8×
- Nursing 1.5×
- Medicine 1.1×
- Neuroscience 0.5×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.4×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.4×
- Environmental Science 0.3×
- Arts and Humanities 0.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Energy 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.0×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Mathematica Policy Research?
Ranked on the composite score, Kimberly Boller, Marsha Gold and John M. Love lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Mathematica Policy Research.
- 1 Kimberly Boller United States · #61,158 worldwide 239 citations · 41 works
- 2 Marsha Gold United States · #92,377 worldwide 94 citations · 39 works
- 3 John M. Love United States · #103,783 worldwide 177 citations · 28 works
- 4 Peter Z. Schochet United States · #116,181 worldwide 285 citations · 32 works
- 5 Randall Brown United States · #122,072 worldwide 140 citations · 25 works
- 6 Eugene C. Rich United States · #142,353 worldwide 105 citations · 35 works
- 7 David Wittenburg United States · #143,719 worldwide 124 citations · 34 works
- 8 Craig Thornton United States · #151,594 worldwide 121 citations · 27 works
- 9 Steven Glazerman United States · #153,878 worldwide 122 citations · 36 works
- 10 Stacy Dale United States · #162,676 worldwide 277 citations · 19 works
Which keywords describe research at Mathematica Policy Research?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Primary Care, Health Care Utilization, Health Outcomes, Quality Improvement, Chronic Disease Management, Epidemiology and Public Health.
- Attachment
- Mortality Risk
- Student Achievement
- Food Insecurity
- Social Determinants
- Developmental Trajectories
- Adolescents
- Emotion Regulation
- Labor Force Participation
- Continuity of Care
- Child Development
- Risk Factors
- Chronic Disease
- COVID-19
- Insurance Markets
- Social Support
- Quality of Life
- Health Outcomes
- Public Health
- Primary Care
- Mental Health
- Epidemiology
- Health Care Utilization
- Quality Improvement
- Chronic Disease Management
- Health Care Spending
- Social Determinants of Health
- Academic Achievement
- Health System Reform
- Depression
- Resilience
- Health Effects
- Patient-Centered Medical Home
- Health Promotion
- Employment Patterns
- Health Disparities
- Parenting
- Nutritional Consequences
- Self-Regulation
- Aging Workforce
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Mental Health19▲ 6.9×21 topics
- Primary Care17▲ 24×9 topics
- Epidemiology15▲ 1.97×30 topics
- Public Health10▲ 3.7×16 topics
- Health Care Utilization10▲ 45×3 topics
- Health Outcomes9▲ 17×5 topics
- Quality Improvement9▲ 24×6 topics
- Quality of Life8▲ 3.0×10 topics
- Chronic Disease Management8▲ 21×4 topics
- Social Support7▲ 6.8×6 topics
- Health Care Spending7▲ 89×1 topic
- Insurance Markets7▲ 89×1 topic
- Social Determinants of Health7▲ 16×3 topics
- COVID-197▲ 2.6×10 topics
- Academic Achievement7▲ 21×7 topics
- Chronic Disease7▲ 20×4 topics
- Health System Reform6▲ 47×2 topics
- Risk Factors6▲ 3.0×17 topics
- Depression6▲ 3.7×10 topics
- Child Development6▲ 7.6×6 topics
- Resilience6▲ 6.7×7 topics
- Continuity of Care6▲ 66×1 topic
- Health Effects6▲ 5.2×4 topics
- Labor Force Participation6▲ 68×2 topics
- Patient-Centered Medical Home6▲ 90×1 topic
- Emotion Regulation6▲ 9.5×3 topics
- Health Promotion5▲ 9.0×4 topics
- Adolescents5▲ 7.5×5 topics
- Employment Patterns5▲ 55×2 topics
- Developmental Trajectories5▲ 22×3 topics
- Health Disparities5▲ 10×8 topics
- Social Determinants5▲ 12×2 topics
- Parenting4▲ 18×2 topics
- Food Insecurity4▲ 39×1 topic
- Nutritional Consequences4▲ 47×1 topic
- Student Achievement4▲ 27×4 topics
- Self-Regulation4▲ 13×3 topics
- Mortality Risk4▲ 8.8×4 topics
- Aging Workforce4▲ 88×1 topic
- Attachment4▲ 23×2 topics
Which research topics does Mathematica Policy Research publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Healthcare Policy and Management, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations and Retirement, Disability, and Employment.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Healthcare Policy and Management Economics and Econometrics 7 works
- 2 Primary Care and Health Outcomes General Health Professions 6 works
- 3 Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations General Health Professions 4 works
- 4 Retirement, Disability, and Employment Demography 4 works
- 5 Advanced Causal Inference Techniques Statistics and Probability 4 works
- 6 Disability Education and Employment Safety Research 3 works
- 7 Community Health and Development General Health Professions 3 works
- 8 Early Childhood Education and Development Education 3 works
- 9 Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development Clinical Psychology 3 works
- 10 Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health General Health Professions 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Mathematica Policy Research's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 21% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Princeton
- Princeton University
- Institute for Advanced Study
- Educational Testing Service
- Siemens (United States)
- Textile Research Institute
- Princeton Theological Seminary
- NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.