National Institute for Testing and Evaluation
- Research works
- 66 ▲ 45% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 1.3k 19.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 4.7% all institutions 10.0%
- Open access
- 28% world 40%
- International
- 20% world 18%
Not ranked overall: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Which fields of science does National Institute for Testing and Evaluation work in?
In all years, 49% of research at National Institute for Testing and Evaluation is in Social Sciences, 28% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Psychology (18%), Medicine (16%), Social Sciences (16%). It does 2.1× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 17 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences3249.0%
- Psychology1218.3%
- Social Sciences1015.7%
- Decision Sciences710.0%
- Arts and Humanities22.6%
- Business, Management and Accounting22.5%
- Physical Sciences1928.0%
- Computer Science812.6%
- Engineering58.2%
- Materials Science23.7%
- Mathematics22.8%
- Chemistry00.5%
- Environmental Science00.3%
- Health Sciences1218.0%
- Medicine1116.4%
- Health Professions11.3%
- Dentistry00.3%
- Life Sciences35.0%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 7.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 10 fields, with their numbers
- Psychology7.77×2 works
- Neuroscience3.27×0 works
- Materials Science1.99×1 works
- Mathematics1.77×0 works
- Computer Science1.61×1 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.37×1 works
- Medicine1.19×2 works
- Social Sciences0.95×1 works
- Engineering0.44×0 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.15×0 works
Who are the top researchers at National Institute for Testing and Evaluation?
Ranked on the quality score, Tzur M. Karelitz, Anat Ben-Simon and Naomi Gafni lead among researchers whose main affiliation is National Institute for Testing and Evaluation.
- 1
Tzur M. Karelitz
Israel · #1,486,848 worldwide 702 citations · 30 works
- 2
Anat Ben-Simon
Israel · #1,823,115 worldwide 519 citations · 16 works
- 3
Naomi Gafni
Israel · #2,379,411 worldwide 811 citations · 22 works
- 4
Avi Allalouf
Israel · #3,034,022 worldwide 470 citations · 27 works
Which keywords describe research at National Institute for Testing and Evaluation?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Meta-Analysis, Personality Traits, Academic Performance, Medical School Selection, Predictive Validity, Structural Equation Modeling, Language Development and Educational Psychology.
- Science
- Academic Medicine
- Kappa Statistic
- Metacognition
- Artificial Neural Network
- Smoke Control
- Professional Identity Formation
- Assessment Methods
- Implicit Bias
- Training
- Intelligence
- Vygotskian Praxis
- Neural Networks
- Reflective Practice
- Measurement Invariance
- Mental Health
- Language Development
- Structural Equation Modeling
- Medical School Selection
- Personality Traits
- Meta-Analysis
- Academic Performance
- Predictive Validity
- Machine Learning
- Educational Psychology
- Factor Analysis
- Working Memory
- Socioeconomic Status
- Dynamic Assessment
- Competency-Based Education
- Simulation
- Gender Bias
- Statistical Methods
- Health Inequities
- Racial Discrimination
- Tunnel Fires
- Curriculum Development
- Inter-Rater Reliability
- Medical Education
- Patient Safety
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Meta-Analysis4▲ 12×7 topics
- Personality Traits4▲ 53×3 topics
- Academic Performance4▲ 80×2 topics
- Medical School Selection4▲ 404×1 topic
- Predictive Validity4▲ 404×1 topic
- Structural Equation Modeling4▲ 39×3 topics
- Machine Learning3▲ 2.1×8 topics
- Language Development3▲ 27×3 topics
- Educational Psychology3▲ 78×2 topics
- Mental Health3▲ 3.8×7 topics
- Factor Analysis3▲ 347×1 topic
- Measurement Invariance3▲ 347×1 topic
- Working Memory2▲ 32×2 topics
- Reflective Practice2▲ 20×3 topics
- Socioeconomic Status2▲ 50×2 topics
- Neural Networks2▲ 3.2×6 topics
- Dynamic Assessment2▲ 119×1 topic
- Vygotskian Praxis2▲ 119×1 topic
- Competency-Based Education2▲ 37×2 topics
- Intelligence2▲ 57×1 topic
- Simulation2▲ 9.4×4 topics
- Training2▲ 17×1 topic
- Gender Bias2▲ 42×2 topics
- Implicit Bias2▲ 65×2 topics
- Statistical Methods2▲ 61×2 topics
- Assessment Methods2▲ 25×1 topic
- Health Inequities2▲ 58×1 topic
- Professional Identity Formation2▲ 43×1 topic
- Racial Discrimination2▲ 83×1 topic
- Smoke Control2▲ 111×1 topic
- Tunnel Fires2▲ 111×1 topic
- Artificial Neural Network2▲ 21×2 topics
- Curriculum Development2▲ 6.4×2 topics
- Metacognition2▲ 20×3 topics
- Inter-Rater Reliability1▲ 383×1 topic
- Kappa Statistic1▲ 383×1 topic
- Medical Education1▲ 8.8×3 topics
- Academic Medicine1▲ 30×1 topic
- Patient Safety1▲ 17×3 topics
- Science1▲ 10×1 topic
Which research topics does National Institute for Testing and Evaluation publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Medical Education and Admissions, Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research and Family and Disability Support Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Medical Education and Admissions Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 2 Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Genetics 1 works
- 3 Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
- 4 Family and Disability Support Research Clinical Psychology 0 works
- 5 Educational Strategies and Epistemologies Developmental and Educational Psychology 0 works
- 6 Gender Studies in Language Gender Studies 0 works
- 7 Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development Clinical Psychology 0 works
- 8 Advancements in Photolithography Techniques Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
- 9 Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning Artificial Intelligence 0 works
- 10 Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods Developmental and Educational Psychology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has National Institute for Testing and Evaluation's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 45% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is National Institute for Testing and Evaluation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000026% in 2024.
Fractional works of National Institute for Testing and Evaluation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Jerusalem
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem
- Hadassah Academic College
- Jerusalem College of Technology
- Israel Ministry of Health
- Israel Antiquities Authority
- Office of the Chief Scientist
- Geological Survey of Israel
- Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about National Institute for Testing and Evaluation. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.