Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Hospital / health system · Redwood City · United States

Proteus Digital Health

proteus.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
32
▼ 93% vs 2018-21
Citations
719
22.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
11.9%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
28%
world 40%
International
14%
world 18%
Proteus Digital Health

Not ranked overall: Proteus Digital Health is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Proteus Digital Health work in?

In all years, 68% of research at Proteus Digital Health is in Health Sciences, 23% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (52%), Health Professions (16%), Engineering (13%). It does 2.4× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 22 fractional works · 67.9% of its workMedicine: 16 fractional works · 51.7% of its workFamily Practice: 4 fractional works · 12.6% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 2 fractional works · 6.7% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 4.6% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workHepatology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workHealth Informatics: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workInternal Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workTransplantation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 5 fractional works · 16.0% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 4 fractional works · 13.6% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workMedical Laboratory Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 7 fractional works · 23.1% of its workEngineering: 4 fractional works · 12.7% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 3 fractional works · 7.9% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 7.0% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workSignal Processing: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCondensed Matter Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCeramics and Composites: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 6.5% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMicrobiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKProteus DigitalHealth32fractional works, all years
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences23%Health Sciences68%Social Sciences6%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 17 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine1651.7%
    2. Health Professions516.0%
    3. Nursing00.2%
    1. Engineering412.7%
    2. Computer Science27.0%
    3. Chemistry01.0%
    4. Mathematics01.0%
    5. Physics and Astronomy00.7%
    6. Environmental Science00.3%
    7. Materials Science00.3%
    1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance12.7%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting01.6%
    3. Social Sciences01.4%
    4. Psychology00.8%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology11.7%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology00.7%
    3. Neuroscience00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Who are the top researchers at Proteus Digital Health?

Ranked on the quality score, George M. Savage, Praveen Raja and Yoona Kim lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Proteus Digital Health.

  1. 1 George M. Savage United States · #2,369,886 worldwide 2.5k citations · 165 works
  2. 2 Praveen Raja United States · #2,437,270 worldwide 443 citations · 17 works
  3. 3 Yoona Kim United States · #2,516,029 worldwide 532 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Proteus Digital Health

What are the most cited papers from Proteus Digital Health?

The most cited paper from Proteus Digital Health is "An Ingestible Sensor for Measuring Medication Adherence" (Hooman Hafezi, Timothy L. Robertson, Greg Moon et al., 2014), with 235 citations. Next come "Approximate Thin Plate Spline Mappings" (233) and "Effectiveness of Digital Medicines to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: Prospective, Open-Label, Cluster-Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial" (224).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 An Ingestible Sensor for Measuring Medication Adherence Hooman Hafezi, Timothy L. Robertson, Greg Moon et al. · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Open access 21 Jul 2014 235
2 Approximate Thin Plate Spline Mappings Gianluca Donato, Serge Belongie · Lecture notes in computer science Conference paper 2002 233
3 Effectiveness of Digital Medicines to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: Prospective, Open-Label, Cluster-Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial Juan P. Frías, Naunihal S. Virdi, Praveen Raja et al. · Journal of Medical Internet Research Open access 11 Jul 2017 224
4 Feasibility of an Ingestible Sensor-Based System for Monitoring Adherence to Tuberculosis Therapy Robert Belknap, Steve Weis, Andrew Brookens et al. · PLoS ONE Open access 7 Jan 2013 169
5 Medication Adherence Assessment Ute Eisenberger, Rudolf Peter Wuthrich, Andreas H. Bock et al. · Transplantation Open access 4 Jul 2013 86
All 55 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Proteus Digital Health?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Chronic Disease Management, Medication Adherence, Adherence, Mobile Health, Health Apps, mHealth, Patient Compliance and Treatment Adherence.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 21 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 21 words, with their numbers
  1. Chronic Disease Management8▲ 180×3 topics
  2. Medication Adherence5▲ 294×2 topics
  3. Adherence4▲ 230×2 topics
  4. Mobile Health4▲ 173×2 topics
  5. Health Apps4▲ 414×1 topic
  6. mHealth4▲ 414×1 topic
  7. Patient Compliance4▲ 606×1 topic
  8. Treatment Adherence4▲ 606×1 topic
  9. Treatment2▲ 5.3×6 topics
  10. Epidemiology2▲ 1.52×9 topics
  11. Risk Factors2▲ 5.6×4 topics
  12. Off-Label Drug Use1▲ 120×1 topic
  13. Pediatric Pharmacokinetics1▲ 120×1 topic
  14. Healthcare1▲ 5.5×3 topics
  15. Immune Response1▲ 6.2×3 topics
  16. Machine Learning1▲ 1.82×3 topics
  17. Big Data1▲ 6.4×3 topics
  18. Cardiovascular Events1▲ 22×2 topics
  19. Inappropriate Medication Use1▲ 90×1 topic
  20. Polypharmacy1▲ 90×1 topic
  21. Cardiovascular Disease1▲ 2.8×3 topics

Which research topics does Proteus Digital Health publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, Digital Transformation in Industry, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks.

Single-cell and spatial …0Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics: 0 fractional worksDigital Transformation i…0Digital Transformation in Industry: 0 fractional worksMobile Health and mHealt…0Mobile Health and mHealth Applications: 0 fractional worksBioinformatics and Genom…0Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks: 0 fractional works
Molecular BiologyIndustrial and Manufacturing EngineeringGeneral Health Professions

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics Molecular Biology 0 works
  2. 2 Digital Transformation in Industry Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 0 works
  3. 3 Mobile Health and mHealth Applications General Health Professions 0 works
  4. 4 Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks Molecular Biology 0 works
  5. 5 Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  6. 6 HIV-related health complications and treatments Emergency Medicine 0 works
  7. 7 HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions Infectious Diseases 0 works
  8. 8 Interprofessional Education and Collaboration General Health Professions 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available27.9%not open72.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors14.0%domestic only86.0%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Proteus Digital Health's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 93% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020052010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Proteus Digital Health as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000021% in 2022.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%0.00015%Proteus Digital Health0.0000056% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of Proteus Digital Health over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Redwood City

All research institutions in Redwood City

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Proteus Digital Health. Posts are plain text and can be reported.