Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion

Qualidigm (United States)

Research works
46
▼ 100% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.6k
57.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
19.9%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
20%
world 40%
International
4%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Qualidigm (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Qualidigm (United States) work in?

In all years, 79% of research at Qualidigm (United States) is in Health Sciences, 11% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (47%), Health Professions (32%), Computer Science (7%). It does 2.9× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 36 fractional works · 79.0% of its workMedicine: 21 fractional works · 46.9% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 7 fractional works · 15.2% of its workEpidemiology: 4 fractional works · 7.8% of its workOncology: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workEmergency Medicine: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workFamily Practice: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 14 fractional works · 31.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 11 fractional works · 23.8% of its workHealth Information Management: 2 fractional works · 3.8% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workResearch and Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 5 fractional works · 11.0% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 4.7% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 4.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 4.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workLibrary and Information Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysical Sciences: 4 fractional works · 8.5% of its workComputer Science: 3 fractional works · 7.4% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workToxicology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKQualidigm (UnitedStates)46fractional works, all years
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences9%Health Sciences79%Social Sciences11%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 15 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine2146.9%
    2. Health Professions1431.7%
    3. Nursing00.4%
    1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance24.7%
    2. Social Sciences24.3%
    3. Psychology01.1%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting00.6%
    5. Decision Sciences00.4%
    1. Computer Science37.4%
    2. Engineering00.6%
    3. Mathematics00.3%
    4. Physics and Astronomy00.2%
    1. Immunology and Microbiology00.7%
    2. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.5%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

    Who are the top researchers at Qualidigm (United States)?

    Ranked on the quality score, Thomas P. Meehan, Marcia K. Petrillo and Tierney E. Giannotti lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Qualidigm (United States).

    1. 1 Thomas P. Meehan United States · #1,122,974 worldwide 5.4k citations · 127 works
    2. 2 Marcia K. Petrillo United States · #2,460,163 worldwide 1.2k citations · 31 works
    3. 3 Tierney E. Giannotti United States · #2,684,114 worldwide 326 citations · 19 works
    4. 4 Maureen Curry United States · #3,372,964 worldwide 481 citations · 20 works
    5. 5 Judith K. Barr United States · #4,716,473 worldwide 459 citations · 43 works
    All ranked researchers at Qualidigm (United States)

    What are the most cited papers from Qualidigm (United States)?

    The most cited paper from Qualidigm (United States) is "Blood Transfusion in Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction" (W.C. Wu, Saif S. Rathore, Yongfei Wang et al., 2001), with 961 citations. Next come "Incidence, predictors at admission, and impact of worsening renal function among patients hospitalized with heart failure" (914) and "Prospective comparison of three validated prediction rules for prognosis in community-acquired pneumonia" (380).

    Most cited papers
    #PaperReleasedCitations
    1 Blood Transfusion in Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction W.C. Wu, Saif S. Rathore, Yongfei Wang et al. · New England Journal of Medicine Open access 25 Oct 2001 961
    2 Incidence, predictors at admission, and impact of worsening renal function among patients hospitalized with heart failure Daniel E. Forman, Javed Butler, Yongfei Wang et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology Open access 2004 914
    3 Prospective comparison of three validated prediction rules for prognosis in community-acquired pneumonia Drahomir Aujesky, Thomas E. Auble, Donald M. Yealy et al. · The American Journal of Medicine Apr 2005 380
    4 Correlates and impact on outcomes of worsening renal function in patients ≥65 years of age with heart failure Harlan M. Krumholz, Ya-Ting Chen, Viola Vaccarino et al. · The American Journal of Cardiology Open access May 2000 380
    5 Outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction Grace L. Smith, Frederick A. Masoudi, Viola Vaccarino et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology Open access May 2003 335
    All 59 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

    Which keywords describe research at Qualidigm (United States)?

    By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Quality Improvement, Primary Care, Guidelines, Cardiovascular Disease, Patient Satisfaction, Clinical Outcomes, Healthcare Quality and Chronic Disease Management.

    ▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

    Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

    All 40 words, with their numbers
    1. Quality Improvement9▲ 98×6 topics
    2. Primary Care7▲ 37×6 topics
    3. Guidelines6▲ 27×8 topics
    4. Epidemiology6▲ 3.1×15 topics
    5. Cardiovascular Disease6▲ 11×9 topics
    6. Patient Satisfaction6▲ 48×4 topics
    7. Clinical Outcomes5▲ 51×3 topics
    8. Chronic Disease Management4▲ 67×2 topics
    9. Healthcare Quality4▲ 84×4 topics
    10. Continuity of Care4▲ 156×2 topics
    11. Patient-Centered Medical Home4▲ 183×1 topic
    12. Pay for Performance4▲ 183×1 topic
    13. Myocardial Infarction4▲ 33×6 topics
    14. Patient Experience4▲ 113×1 topic
    15. Public Reporting4▲ 356×1 topic
    16. Risk Factors3▲ 6.7×12 topics
    17. Acute Coronary Syndromes3▲ 154×1 topic
    18. ST-Segment Elevation3▲ 154×1 topic
    19. Health Care Utilization3▲ 44×2 topics
    20. Heart Failure3▲ 13×8 topics
    21. Treatment3▲ 4.3×6 topics
    22. Diagnosis2▲ 4.1×3 topics
    23. Health Care Spending2▲ 66×1 topic
    24. Insurance Markets2▲ 66×1 topic
    25. B-Type Natriuretic Peptide2▲ 89×1 topic
    26. Hospital Readmission2▲ 89×1 topic
    27. Critical Care2▲ 15×3 topics
    28. Quality of Care2▲ 48×2 topics
    29. Sepsis2▲ 21×2 topics
    30. Anomaly Detection1▲ 20×2 topics
    31. Cancer Incidence1▲ 21×2 topics
    32. Data Mining1▲ 7.0×2 topics
    33. Nursing Home1▲ 84×1 topic
    34. Person-Centered Care1▲ 84×1 topic
    35. Clinical Guidelines1▲ 9.3×5 topics
    36. Healthcare-Associated Infections1▲ 24×3 topics
    37. Infection1▲ 11×2 topics
    38. Intrusion Detection1▲ 30×2 topics
    39. IoT Security1▲ 17×2 topics
    40. Prevention Guidelines1▲ 29×2 topics

    Which research topics does Qualidigm (United States) publish most on?

    By volume: Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare, Acute Myocardial Infarction Research and Healthcare Policy and Management.

    1. 1 Primary Care and Health Outcomes General Health Professions 4 works
    2. 2 Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare General Health Professions 4 works
    3. 3 Acute Myocardial Infarction Research Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 3 works
    4. 4 Healthcare Policy and Management Economics and Econometrics 2 works
    5. 5 Heart Failure Treatment and Management Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2 works
    6. 6 Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes General Health Professions 1 works
    7. 7 Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment Epidemiology 1 works
    8. 8 Network Security and Intrusion Detection Computer Networks and Communications 1 works
    9. 9 Global Cancer Incidence and Screening Oncology 1 works
    10. 10 Healthcare Quality and Management Health Information Management 1 works

    How open and international is its research?

    Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

    openly available19.7%not open80.3%

    World: 40% of research is openly available.

    with international co-authors4.2%domestic only95.8%

    World: 18% is written across borders.

    How has Qualidigm (United States)'s research output changed?

    Output in 2022-2025 was 100% lower than in 2018-2021.

    20002005201020152020
    grewheldshrank

    The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

    Its share of all research

    Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Qualidigm (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000013% in 2020.

    0.00020%0.00040%Qualidigm (United States)0.0000076% in 2021200020102020

    Fractional works of Qualidigm (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

    Other research institutions in Wethersfield

    All research institutions in Wethersfield

    Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

    Discussion

    Ask a question or share a note about Qualidigm (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.