Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Surgery

Surgical site infection prevention

Surgical site infection prevention is a research topic within Surgery. Science Explorer counts 21k research works in it since 1950. 18.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the prevention, management, and impact of surgical site infections (SSI) in various surgical procedures. It covers topics such as antimicrobial prophylaxis, wound therapy, risk factors for SSI, healthcare-associated infections, and the economic burden of SSI. The papers also discuss the use of perioperative antibiotics, clinical guidelines for infection prevention, and the incidence of SSI in different surgical specialties.

  • Surgical Site Infection
  • Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
  • Wound Therapy
  • Infection Prevention
  • Perioperative Antibiotics
  • Healthcare-Associated Infections
  • Risk Factors
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Cost Analysis
  • Clinical Guidelines
Research works
21k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
3.8k
per year above
Top-10% rate
18.4%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+38%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Surgical site infection prevention research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.1k and 537 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.1k works
  2. 2 China 537 works
  3. 3 India 268 works
  4. 4 United Kingdom 267 works
  5. 5 Japan 210 works
  6. 6 Germany 177 works
  7. 7 Italy 130 works
  8. 8 Australia 115 works
  9. 9 Türkiye 110 works
  10. 10 Spain 100 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 37.5%China: 17.5%India: 8.7%United Kingdom: 8.7%6 others listed: 27.5%37%largest
United States1,149 · 37.5%China537 · 17.5%India268 · 8.7%United Kingdom267 · 8.7%6 others listed843 · 27.5%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Surgical site infection prevention research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Cleveland Clinic publishes the most Surgical site infection prevention research, followed by Harvard University and All India Institute of Medical Sciences.

Who are the leading researchers in Surgical site infection prevention?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Surgical site infection prevention include Ziad A. Memish.

  1. 1 Ziad A. Memish Saudi Arabia 5.3k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Surgical site infection prevention research done?

The largest centres of Surgical site infection prevention research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), New York (United States), London (United Kingdom) and Tokyo (Japan). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Cleveland, Durham and Karachi.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 65 works
  2. 2 New York United States 63 works
  3. 3 London United Kingdom 62 works
  4. 4 Tokyo Japan 54 works
  5. 5 Seoul South Korea 45 works
  6. 6 Philadelphia United States 41 works
  7. 7 Boston United States 40 works
  8. 8 Shanghai China 35 works
  9. 9 Chengdu China 32 works
  10. 10 Baltimore United States 32 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. ClevelandUS · 29.1 works4.6×
  2. DurhamUS · 23.8 works4.4×
  3. KarachiPK · 23.7 works4.3×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Surgical site infection prevention than the world average.

See Surgical site infection prevention on the map

Where is the best place to study Surgical site infection prevention?

Among universities, judged by research, Institute of Medical Sciences, Duke University and All India Institute of Medical Sciences score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%30%mean 17.4%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Institute of Medical Sciences: 11, 1.8%Duke University: 11, 20.1%All India Institute of Medical Sciences: 12, 9.0%Harvard University: 12, 17.9%Stanford University: 9, 19.7%Sichuan University: 11, 24.0%Emory University: 9, 21.3%Johns Hopkins University: 10, 19.3%University of Pennsylvania: 9, 24.3%Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College: 9, 16.6%Duke UniversityHarvard UniversityAll India Institute …Institute of Medical…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 46.91.8%8.1×11 +366.4%
2 Duke UniversityUnited States 41.020.1%3.6×11 +106.7%
3 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 40.49.0%4.7×12 +138.1%
4 Harvard UniversityUnited States 38.817.9%2.3×12 +60.3%
5 Stanford UniversityUnited States 34.819.7%1.8×9 +178.3%
6 Sichuan UniversityChina 30.424.0%1.5×11 +6.4%
7 Emory UniversityUnited States 28.321.3%3.0×9 +33.3%
8 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 27.819.3%2.1×10 +40.3%
9 University of PennsylvaniaUnited States 27.024.3%2.1×9 +43.6%
10 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 25.816.6%2.2×9 +89.8%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Surgical site infection prevention research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 38% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Surgical site infection prevention.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.