Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes is a research topic within Surgery. Science Explorer counts 60k research works in it since 1950. 15.2% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on various aspects of liver transplantation, including ischemia-reperfusion injury, graft survival analysis, donor risk index, biliary complications, living donor liver transplantation, hepatic ischemia, machine perfusion, and organ preservation. The papers cover a wide range of topics related to liver transplantation and provide insights into the mechanisms of injury, surgical techniques, and long-term outcomes.
- Liver Transplantation
- Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
- Graft Survival
- Donor Risk Index
- Biliary Complications
- Living Donor Liver Transplantation
- Hepatic Ischemia
- Machine Perfusion
- Organ Preservation
- Histopathologic Staging
- Research works
- 60k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 9.1k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 15.2% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +14% the tick is no change
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (2.6k and 1.1k works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 2.6k works
- 2 China 1.1k works
- 3 India 457 works
- 4 Japan 452 works
- 5 South Korea 425 works
- 6 United Kingdom 348 works
- 7 Germany 342 works
- 8 Italy 329 works
- 9 France 273 works
- 10 Spain 269 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Cleveland Clinic publishes the most Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes research, followed by Stanford University and Yonsei University.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Cleveland ClinicUnited States 49 works
- 2 Stanford UniversityUnited States 40 works
- 3 Yonsei UniversitySouth Korea 36 works
- 4 University of California, San FranciscoUnited States 34 works
- 5 Massachusetts General HospitalUnited States 34 works
- 6 Mayo Clinic in FloridaUnited States 34 works
- 7 Medizinische Hochschule HannoverGermany 33 works
- 8 University of PennsylvaniaUnited States 33 works
- 9 Institute of Liver and Biliary SciencesIndia 32 works
- 10 Samsung Medical CenterSouth Korea 31 works
Who are the leading researchers in Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes include Giuseppe Remuzzi, Vivekanand Jha and Jordi Bruix.
- 1 Giuseppe Remuzzi Italy 8.1k citations
- 2 Vivekanand Jha India 5.8k citations
- 3 Jordi Bruix Spain 3.7k citations
- 4 Kewal Krishan India 3.6k citations
- 5 Yi Zhang China 3.6k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes research done?
The largest centres of Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes research in 2022–2025 are Seoul (South Korea), Beijing (China), New York (United States) and Guangzhou (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Ulsan.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 Seoul South Korea 251 works
- 2 Beijing China 134 works
- 3 New York United States 133 works
- 4 Guangzhou China 115 works
- 5 London United Kingdom 111 works
- 6 Tokyo Japan 107 works
- 7 Paris France 103 works
- 8 Los Angeles United States 101 works
- 9 Philadelphia United States 94 works
- 10 Shanghai China 90 works
Where it is the local speciality
- UlsanKR · 48.6 works12×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes?
Among universities, judged by research, Medical University of Vienna, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Innsbruck Medical University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Medical University of ViennaAustria | 70.7 | 27.9% | 9.0× | 23 | +21.4% |
| 2 | University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusUnited States | 61.9 | 21.0% | 9.0× | 20 | +84.1% |
| 3 | Innsbruck Medical UniversityAustria | 59.2 | 22.0% | 19.3× | 15 | -39.9% |
| 4 | SUNY Downstate Health Sciences UniversityUnited States | 57.9 | 23.0% | 15.1× | 10 | +75.9% |
| 5 | University of GroningenNetherlands | 57.6 | 31.9% | 3.4× | 14 | +74.3% |
| 6 | Medizinische Hochschule HannoverGermany | 56.5 | 10.8% | 18.6× | 33 | -12.1% |
| 7 | University of California, San FranciscoUnited States | 56.3 | 18.1% | 6.4× | 34 | +28.5% |
| 8 | Stanford UniversityUnited States | 56.1 | 22.4% | 3.9× | 40 | +34.4% |
| 9 | Medical University of WarsawPoland | 56.0 | 17.6% | 9.9× | 18 | +11.2% |
| 10 | Duke UniversityUnited States | 55.0 | 22.9% | 4.6× | 27 | +62.3% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 14% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.