SMART Reading
In research, SMART Reading stands highest in Physical Sciences (#4,765 of 10,670 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#6,682 of 9,585 worldwide), 2022-now.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #8,055 of 22,385 · #6,129 all time
- Rank in United States
- #1,090 of 3,332
- Research works
- 948 ▲ 6% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 13k 13.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.1% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.95× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 40% world 40%
- International
- 40% world 18%
What is SMART Reading known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #4,765 of 10,670 | 16.1% | 90 | #4837 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #6,682 of 9,585 | 15.2% | 70 | #7616 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where SMART Reading sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does SMART Reading work in?
In 2022-now, 46% of research at SMART Reading is in Physical Sciences, 33% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (23%), Computer Science (14%), Social Sciences (13%). It does 1.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Physical Sciences10846.2%
- Engineering5322.7%
- Computer Science3414.5%
- Environmental Science83.4%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences31.5%
- Materials Science31.5%
- Energy21.0%
- Physics and Astronomy20.7%
- Chemical Engineering10.4%
- Chemistry10.4%
- Mathematics00.1%
- Social Sciences7833.3%
- Social Sciences3012.6%
- Psychology187.6%
- Business, Management and Accounting166.8%
- Arts and Humanities62.4%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance52.3%
- Decision Sciences41.6%
- Health Sciences3213.6%
- Medicine219.1%
- Health Professions93.9%
- Veterinary10.3%
- Nursing00.2%
- Dentistry00.2%
- Life Sciences166.9%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 2.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Psychology2.48×18 works
- Business, Management and Accounting2.12×16 works
- Veterinary1.91×1 works
- Computer Science1.86×34 works
- Decision Sciences1.65×4 works
- Engineering1.51×53 works
- Health Professions1.48×9 works
- Chemical Engineering1.29×1 works
- Neuroscience1.11×4 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.08×5 works
- Energy1.04×2 works
- Social Sciences1.00×30 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.94×4 works
- Arts and Humanities0.82×6 works
- Environmental Science0.68×8 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.56×1 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.53×6 works
- Medicine0.47×21 works
- Materials Science0.42×4 works
- Nursing0.42×0 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.35×4 works
- Dentistry0.34×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.32×2 works
- Chemistry0.27×1 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.24×0 works
- Mathematics0.12×0 works
- Psychology 2.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 2.1×
- Veterinary 1.9×
- Computer Science 1.9×
- Decision Sciences 1.6×
- Engineering 1.5×
- Health Professions 1.5×
- Chemical Engineering 1.3×
- Neuroscience 1.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.1×
- Energy 1.0×
- Social Sciences 1.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.9×
- Arts and Humanities 0.8×
- Environmental Science 0.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Medicine 0.5×
- Materials Science 0.4×
- Nursing 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Dentistry 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Chemistry 0.3×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at SMART Reading?
Ranked on the quality score, Xin Lai, Dag Von Lubitz and Torbjörn Lundmark lead among researchers whose main affiliation is SMART Reading.
- 1
Xin Lai
United States · #765,272 worldwide 1.1k citations · 20 works
- 2
Dag Von Lubitz
United States · #2,059,383 worldwide 678 citations · 59 works
- 3
Torbjörn Lundmark
United States · #2,843,128 worldwide 44 citations · 41 works
- 4
Phil Sherry
United States · #3,071,511 worldwide 2 citations · 15 works
- 5
Tom Vander Ark
United States · #3,491,736 worldwide 193 citations · 29 works
- 6
Rosalinda Alfaro-LeFevre
United States · #3,827,581 worldwide 381 citations · 22 works
- 7
Harm Naaijer
United States · #3,887,867 worldwide 19 citations · 21 works
- 8
Riánsares López Muñoz
United States · #4,486,433 worldwide 9 citations · 15 works
- 9
John William DenBoer
United States · #5,098,281 worldwide 207 citations · 34 works
Which keywords describe research at SMART Reading?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Deep Learning, Machine Learning, Risk Management, Comorbidity, Sustainability, Neurobiology, Prevalence and Impulsivity.
- BIM
- Convolutional Networks
- Construction
- Fracture Propagation
- Well Integrity
- Customer Satisfaction
- Media Literacy
- CO2 Sequestration
- E-commerce
- Community Empowerment
- Pathological Gambling
- Impulsivity
- Big Data
- Remote Sensing
- Consumer Behavior
- Prevalence
- Social Media
- Risk Management
- Neural Networks
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
- Sustainability
- Artificial Intelligence
- Treatment
- Comorbidity
- Sustainable Development
- Mental Health
- Supply Chain Management
- Neurobiology
- Islamic Banking
- Corporate Governance
- Digital Transformation
- Artificial Neural Networks
- Ethics
- Vibration Analysis
- Drilling Fluids
- Hydraulic Fracturing
- Shale Gas Reservoirs
- Unsupervised Learning
- Facilities Management
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Deep Learning16▲ 2.0×39 topics
- Machine Learning14▲ 1.80×37 topics
- Sustainability11▲ 1.94×26 topics
- Neural Networks8▲ 2.1×21 topics
- Artificial Intelligence7▲ 2.2×19 topics
- Risk Management7▲ 6.0×7 topics
- Treatment6▲ 2.2×12 topics
- Social Media6▲ 1.82×8 topics
- Comorbidity6▲ 22×4 topics
- Prevalence6▲ 6.0×5 topics
- Sustainable Development6▲ 1.56×17 topics
- Consumer Behavior6▲ 3.8×9 topics
- Mental Health6▲ 1.66×9 topics
- Remote Sensing6▲ 1.91×13 topics
- Supply Chain Management6▲ 2.6×10 topics
- Big Data5▲ 2.4×13 topics
- Neurobiology5▲ 8.6×3 topics
- Impulsivity5▲ 39×1 topic
- Islamic Banking5▲ 5.7×3 topics
- Pathological Gambling5▲ 172×1 topic
- Corporate Governance5▲ 2.9×5 topics
- Community Empowerment5▲ 2.8×5 topics
- Digital Transformation5▲ 3.6×9 topics
- E-commerce4▲ 3.2×5 topics
- Artificial Neural Networks4▲ 3.8×6 topics
- CO2 Sequestration4▲ 8.7×2 topics
- Ethics4▲ 3.4×8 topics
- Media Literacy4▲ 3.3×3 topics
- Vibration Analysis4▲ 6.1×2 topics
- Customer Satisfaction4▲ 5.0×5 topics
- Drilling Fluids4▲ 30×1 topic
- Well Integrity4▲ 30×1 topic
- Hydraulic Fracturing3▲ 13×2 topics
- Fracture Propagation3▲ 23×1 topic
- Shale Gas Reservoirs3▲ 23×1 topic
- Construction3▲ 10×2 topics
- Unsupervised Learning3▲ 8.7×3 topics
- Convolutional Networks3▲ 9.4×3 topics
- Facilities Management3▲ 15×2 topics
- BIM2▲ 17×1 topic
Which research topics does SMART Reading publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Gambling Behavior and Treatments, Drilling and Well Engineering, Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis and SMEs Development and Digital Marketing.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Gambling Behavior and Treatments Clinical Psychology 5 works
- 2 Drilling and Well Engineering Ocean Engineering 4 works
- 3 Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis Mechanical Engineering 3 works
- 4 SMEs Development and Digital Marketing Demography 3 works
- 5 BIM and Construction Integration Building and Construction 2 works
- 6 Islamic Finance and Communication Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 7 Islamic Finance and Banking Studies Accounting 2 works
- 8 Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics Civil and Structural Engineering 2 works
- 9 Employment and Welfare Studies General Health Professions 2 works
- 10 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has SMART Reading's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 6% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is SMART Reading as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00048% in 2024.
Fractional works of SMART Reading over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 18.3% in 2016.
Other research institutions in Portland
- Oregon Health & Science University
- Portland State University
- University of Portland
- Lewis & Clark College
- Reed College
- Oregon Medical Research Center
- Concordia University
- Legacy Health
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about SMART Reading. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
