Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Vienna · United States

The Jane Goodall Institute

janegoodall.orgROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#15,992
of 42,892
Rank in United States
#3,497
of 8,685
Research works
235
▲ 30% vs 2013–17
Citations
8.1k
34.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
7.2%
record average 16.5%
Open access
39%
world 28%

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 2.01× its world share, 3 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.09× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.22× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.17× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.61× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 2.52× its world share, 7 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.01× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.34× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.62× its world share, 3 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 1.28× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 0.97× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.51× its world share, 3 worksMedicineNursing: 0.97× its world share, 0 worksNursingVeterinary: 2.34× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 3.25× its world share, 3 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 0.66× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2.06× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.92× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.97× its world share, 4 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 3.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at The Jane Goodall Institute?

Ranked on the composite score, Jane Qiu lead among researchers whose main affiliation is The Jane Goodall Institute.

  1. 1 Jane Qiu United States · #287,591 worldwide 121 citations · 55 works
All ranked researchers at The Jane Goodall Institute

Which keywords describe research at The Jane Goodall Institute?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Cultural Heritage, Food Security, Ethical Considerations, Population Dynamics, Public Health, Evolution, Climate Change and Identity.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 16 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 16 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change2▲ 2.2×10 topics
  2. Sustainability2▲ 2.0×9 topics
  3. Cultural Heritage2▲ 8.1×4 topics
  4. Education2▲ 2.7×8 topics
  5. Public Health2▲ 3.2×5 topics
  6. Food Security2▲ 7.6×7 topics
  7. Social Media2▲ 3.0×4 topics
  8. Identity1▲ 5.0×4 topics
  9. Ethical Considerations1▲ 10×5 topics
  10. Epidemiology1▼ 0.77×10 topics
  11. Evolution1▲ 12×2 topics
  12. Population Dynamics1▲ 13×4 topics
  13. Brazil1▲ 29×2 topics
  14. Digital Communication1▲ 40×1 topic
  15. Information Studies1▲ 137×1 topic
  16. Medical Education1▲ 11×4 topics

Which research topics does The Jane Goodall Institute publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts, Human auditory perception and evaluation, Natural Language Processing Techniques and Primate Behavior and Ecology.

Cultural Insights and Di…1Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts: 1 fractional worksHuman auditory perceptio…1Human auditory perception and evaluation: 1 fractional worksNatural Language Process…1Natural Language Processing Techniques: 1 fractional worksPrimate Behavior and Eco…1Primate Behavior and Ecology: 1 fractional worksWildlife Ecology and Conservation: 1 fractional worksHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life: 0 fractional worksNutrition, Genetics, and…0Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease: 0 fractional worksLiterature, Culture, and Criticism: 0 fractional worksGender, Sexuality, and Education: 0 fractional worksGlobal Health and Surgery0Global Health and Surgery: 0 fractional works
Computer Networks and CommunicationsAerospace EngineeringArtificial IntelligenceSocial Psychology6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts Computer Networks and Communications 1 works
  2. 2 Human auditory perception and evaluation Aerospace Engineering 1 works
  3. 3 Natural Language Processing Techniques Artificial Intelligence 1 works
  4. 4 Primate Behavior and Ecology Social Psychology 1 works
  5. 5 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 1 works
  6. 6 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  7. 7 Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease Genetics 0 works
  8. 8 Literature, Culture, and Criticism Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
  9. 9 Gender, Sexuality, and Education Gender Studies 0 works
  10. 10 Global Health and Surgery Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available39.4%not open60.6%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors37.8%domestic only62.2%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has The Jane Goodall Institute's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 30% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Vienna

All research institutions in Vienna

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.