Brazil vs Ireland
On research quality in 2022-now, Brazil ranks #28 in the world and Ireland #30, of 189 countries. Brazil stands higher in 19 of the 26 fields both publish in, Ireland in 7.
Research profiles alike: 0.64similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Brazil
- World rank, 2022-now
- #28
- #23 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 703k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 6.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 69%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Forestry, General Arts and Humanities, Information Systems and Management.
Ireland
- World rank, 2022-now
- #30
- #27 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 57k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 12.5%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 42%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Geriatrics and Gerontology, Medical Terminology, Research and Theory.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Ireland leads on 5 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, international co-authorship and growth. Brazil leads on 3 of 9 measures: research quality, output and open access. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #28Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#30
- 0.67×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.01×
- 703kOutputfractional works, 2022-now57k
- 6.4%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited12.5%
- 9.0Citations per workall time, per fractional work23.1
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 69%Open accessof its works free to read, all time42%
- 14%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time28%
- -8%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+4%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Brazil stands higher in 19 of 26 fields, Ireland in 7. Brazil leads most in Nursing (#16 against #28); Ireland leads most in Neuroscience (#25 against #33). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #24Agricultural and Biological Sciences#29
- #21Arts and Humanities#34
- #33Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#26
- #24Business, Management and Accounting#32
- #30Chemical Engineering-
- #33Chemistry#28
- #28Computer Science#30
- #22Decision Sciences#27
- #22Dentistry#31
- #29Earth and Planetary Sciences#30
- #30Economics, Econometrics and Finance#32
- #34Energy#36
- #33Engineering#30
- #21Environmental Science#32
- #20Health Professions#26
- #29Immunology and Microbiology#23
- #35Materials Science#28
- #31Mathematics#36
- #25Medicine#26
- #33Neuroscience#25
- #16Nursing#28
- #26Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-
- #26Physics and Astronomy#35
- #26Psychology#25
- #18Social Sciences#32
- #18Veterinary-
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Brazil rank | Ireland rank | Brazil top 10% | Ireland top 10% | Brazil works | Ireland works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #24 | #29 | 5.7% | 16.0% | 53k | 2k |
| Arts and Humanities | #21 | #34 | 8.0% | 12.3% | 40k | 2.3k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #33 | #26 | 5.1% | 12.2% | 23k | 2.9k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #24 | #32 | 4.5% | 17.5% | 14k | 1.3k |
| Chemical Engineering | #30 | - | 5.4% | - | 1k | - |
| Chemistry | #33 | #28 | 5.7% | 11.0% | 5.8k | 587 |
| Computer Science | #28 | #30 | 6.4% | 11.6% | 31k | 3.7k |
| Decision Sciences | #22 | #27 | 8.7% | 13.3% | 16k | 540 |
| Dentistry | #22 | #31 | 5.8% | 15.8% | 8.7k | 212 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #29 | #30 | 5.9% | 11.9% | 6.2k | 598 |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #30 | #32 | 4.8% | 11.8% | 8.9k | 1.3k |
| Energy | #34 | #36 | 4.7% | 11.4% | 2.6k | 304 |
| Engineering | #33 | #30 | 4.7% | 12.8% | 46k | 5.6k |
| Environmental Science | #21 | #32 | 6.9% | 12.2% | 55k | 2.4k |
| Health Professions | #20 | #26 | 7.0% | 11.6% | 38k | 2.7k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #29 | #23 | 5.2% | 12.5% | 6.1k | 573 |
| Materials Science | #35 | #28 | 4.5% | 13.2% | 10k | 1k |
| Mathematics | #31 | #36 | 5.5% | 10.8% | 4.8k | 441 |
| Medicine | #25 | #26 | 4.8% | 11.3% | 113k | 15k |
| Neuroscience | #33 | #25 | 4.6% | 12.8% | 6.4k | 1.1k |
| Nursing | #16 | #28 | 5.3% | 15.1% | 3.8k | 363 |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #26 | - | 6.1% | - | 1.6k | - |
| Physics and Astronomy | #26 | #35 | 4.8% | 9.5% | 7k | 841 |
| Psychology | #26 | #25 | 5.5% | 12.7% | 22k | 2.8k |
| Social Sciences | #18 | #32 | 8.2% | 14.0% | 177k | 7.5k |
| Veterinary | #18 | - | 4.8% | - | 1.9k | - |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Brazil
- Organizational Management
- Human Resources Management
- Quantitative Research
- Innovation Management
- Discourse Analysis
- Environmental Education
- Anthropology
- Critical Pedagogy
- Educational Policies
- Distance Learning
- Social Determinants
- Brazil
- Biodiversity
- Healthcare
- Online Learning
- Educational Technology
- Quality of Life
- Globalization
- Public Policy
- Sustainability
- Epidemiology
- Teacher Training
- Qualitative Research
- Public Health
- Education
- Social Inequality
- Curriculum Development
- Healthcare Access
- Cultural Identity
- Social Movements
- Inclusive Education
- Pedagogical Practices
- Educational Reform
- Health Policy
- Agroecology
- Data Analysis
- Research Methods
- Marketing Strategies
- Case Study
- Competence Management
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology44k▲ 1.41×140 topics
- Sustainability41k▲ 2.2×139 topics
- Teacher Training41k▲ 8.6×30 topics
- Public Policy40k▲ 11×34 topics
- Qualitative Research39k▲ 5.9×46 topics
- Globalization36k▲ 2.4×185 topics
- Public Health35k▲ 3.1×77 topics
- Quality of Life30k▲ 2.7×61 topics
- Education30k▲ 2.3×160 topics
- Educational Technology30k▲ 3.2×48 topics
- Social Inequality24k▲ 12×21 topics
- Online Learning24k▲ 3.7×27 topics
- Curriculum Development23k▲ 4.4×20 topics
- Healthcare23k▲ 2.6×44 topics
- Healthcare Access20k▲ 9.4×13 topics
- Biodiversity20k▲ 3.3×38 topics
- Cultural Identity19k▲ 4.8×40 topics
- Brazil18k▲ 26×5 topics
- Social Movements18k▲ 7.6×33 topics
- Social Determinants16k▲ 10×8 topics
- Inclusive Education16k▲ 5.8×20 topics
- Distance Learning16k▲ 5.8×14 topics
- Pedagogical Practices15k▲ 22×3 topics
- Educational Policies15k▲ 18×3 topics
- Educational Reform15k▲ 16×9 topics
- Critical Pedagogy15k▲ 22×4 topics
- Health Policy14k▲ 12×7 topics
- Anthropology13k▲ 18×11 topics
- Agroecology13k▲ 12×6 topics
- Environmental Education13k▲ 11×11 topics
- Data Analysis13k▲ 6.4×14 topics
- Discourse Analysis13k▲ 6.8×12 topics
- Research Methods13k▲ 10×9 topics
- Innovation Management13k▲ 10×10 topics
- Marketing Strategies13k▲ 17×3 topics
- Quantitative Research12k▲ 13×5 topics
- Case Study12k▲ 25×2 topics
- Human Resources Management12k▲ 25×2 topics
- Competence Management12k▲ 27×1 topic
- Organizational Management12k▲ 27×1 topic
Ireland
- Elderly Patients
- Consociationalism
- Paramilitarism
- Ethical Considerations
- Transition
- Conflict
- Anxiety
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Ethnicity
- Primary Care
- Big Data
- Diagnosis
- Depression
- Nationalism
- Risk Factors
- Sustainability
- Globalization
- Quality of Life
- Inflammation
- Machine Learning
- Epidemiology
- Deep Learning
- Climate Change
- Public Health
- Mental Health
- Identity
- Treatment
- Healthcare
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Mortality
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Clinical Trials
- Aging
- Gender
- Ethics
- Colonialism
- Guidelines
- Reconciliation
- Peace Process
- Northern Ireland
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology3,426▲ 1.32×140 topics
- Machine Learning1,968◆ 0.91×97 topics
- Deep Learning1,901▼ 0.85×85 topics
- Inflammation1,794▲ 1.30×83 topics
- Climate Change1,640◆ 0.93×126 topics
- Quality of Life1,554▲ 1.66×60 topics
- Public Health1,496▲ 1.58×74 topics
- Globalization1,471◆ 1.15×169 topics
- Mental Health1,411▲ 1.52×48 topics
- Sustainability1,365▼ 0.86×128 topics
- Identity1,177▲ 2.5×76 topics
- Risk Factors1,162▲ 1.63×37 topics
- Treatment1,069▲ 1.35×52 topics
- Nationalism979▲ 3.4×33 topics
- Healthcare974▲ 1.31×42 topics
- Depression963▲ 1.69×26 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease938▲ 1.27×39 topics
- Diagnosis800▲ 1.32×41 topics
- Mortality754▲ 2.0×13 topics
- Big Data735▲ 1.18×36 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome707▲ 1.34×24 topics
- Primary Care706▲ 2.9×15 topics
- Clinical Trials691▲ 1.59×19 topics
- Ethnicity682▲ 2.8×25 topics
- Aging678▲ 1.92×19 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines619▲ 1.73×14 topics
- Gender605▲ 1.73×57 topics
- Anxiety598▲ 1.93×12 topics
- Ethics595▲ 1.81×57 topics
- Conflict588▲ 5.6×11 topics
- Colonialism580▲ 1.88×50 topics
- Transition568▲ 9.9×6 topics
- Guidelines565▲ 1.84×13 topics
- Ethical Considerations545▲ 2.4×21 topics
- Reconciliation466▲ 42×2 topics
- Paramilitarism463▲ 37×2 topics
- Peace Process463▲ 37×2 topics
- Consociationalism460▲ 61×1 topic
- Northern Ireland460▲ 61×1 topic
- Elderly Patients408▲ 3.7×4 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Brazil has out-published Ireland every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 1In the top 5002
- 5In the top 1,0006
- #30Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#26
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Brazil or Ireland?
Brazil publishes 12.4× as much research as Ireland in 2022-now (703k against 57k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Brazil or Ireland?
12.5% of Ireland's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 6.4% for Brazil.
Is Brazil or Ireland growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +4% against 2018-21 for Ireland, and -8% for Brazil.
Which has more open access research, Brazil or Ireland?
69% of Brazil's research is free to read, against 42% of Ireland's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Brazil or Ireland?
Brazil holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Ireland 0; in the top 1,000 it is 5 against 6.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Brazil
- 1Universidade de São Paulo7.3% top 10% · 42k works
- 2Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)8.0% top 10% · 16k works
- 3Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro7.0% top 10% · 16k works
- 4Universidade Federal de Pernambuco6.1% top 10% · 10k works
- 5Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina7.1% top 10% · 14k works
- 6Universidade Federal de São Carlos7.3% top 10% · 8k works
Ireland
- 1Trinity College Dublin12.5% top 10% · 8.7k works
- 2University College Dublin13.3% top 10% · 11k works
- 3University College Cork12.4% top 10% · 6.3k works
- 4University of Limerick13.4% top 10% · 4k works
- 5Dublin City University14.9% top 10% · 3.6k works
- 6Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway13.3% top 10% · 4.6k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Brazil
- 1 Cesar Augusto Costa #1,403 worldwide 92k citations · 285 works
- 2 M. Constancio #1,669 worldwide 67k citations · 138 works
- 3 Amanda Lange Sálvia #2,241 worldwide 7.4k citations · 432 works
- 4 E. C. Ferreira #3,093 worldwide 73k citations · 138 works
- 5 Marcos Roberto Tovani‐Palone #5,134 worldwide 120k citations · 231 works
Ireland
- 1 John F. Cryan #7,253 worldwide 121k citations · 1,303 works
- 2 Daniel G. Bradley #7,738 worldwide 31k citations · 297 works
- 3 Sarbast Moslem #8,647 worldwide 4.1k citations · 161 works
- 4 Liam O’Mahony #8,737 worldwide 35k citations · 369 works
- 5 John Gerard Laffey #9,250 worldwide 42k citations · 705 works
Other comparisons
Brazilvs
New Zealand
Brazilvs
Czechia
Brazilvs
Portugal
Irelandvs
Portugal
Brazilvs
South Africa
Brazilvs
Saudi Arabia
Irelandvs
South Africa
Irelandvs
Saudi Arabia
Hungaryvs
Ireland
Chilevs
Ireland