Namibia vs South Africa
On research quality in 2022-now, South Africa ranks #29 in the world and Namibia #93, of 189 countries. Namibia stands higher in 0 of the 25 fields both publish in, South Africa in 25.
Research profiles alike: 0.88very similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Namibia
- World rank, 2022-now
- #93
- #111 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 2.3k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 6.2%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 57%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Research and Theory, Archeology, Library and Information Sciences.
South Africa
- World rank, 2022-now
- #29
- #31 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 113k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 10.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 49%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Archeology, Religious studies, Research and Theory.
Who leads, measure by measure?
South Africa leads on 5 of 9 measures: research quality, citation excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate and citations per work. Namibia leads on 3 of 9 measures: open access, international co-authorship and growth. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #93Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#29
- 0.93×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.06×
- 2.3kOutputfractional works, 2022-now113k
- 6.2%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited10.6%
- 9.1Citations per workall time, per fractional work16.2
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 57%Open accessof its works free to read, all time49%
- 38%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time22%
- +43%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+17%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Namibia stands higher in 0 of 25 fields, South Africa in 25. South Africa leads most in Environmental Science (#29 against #95). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- -Agricultural and Biological Sciences#28
- -Arts and Humanities#20
- -Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#31
- -Business, Management and Accounting#29
- -Chemical Engineering#32
- -Chemistry#38
- #81Computer Science#32
- -Decision Sciences#26
- -Dentistry#39
- -Earth and Planetary Sciences#28
- -Economics, Econometrics and Finance#22
- -Energy#43
- -Engineering#36
- #95Environmental Science#29
- -Health Professions#29
- -Immunology and Microbiology#24
- -Materials Science#32
- -Mathematics#28
- #95Medicine#23
- -Neuroscience#37
- -Nursing#34
- -Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics#24
- -Physics and Astronomy#33
- -Psychology#24
- #93Social Sciences#22
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Namibia rank | South Africa rank | Namibia top 10% | South Africa top 10% | Namibia works | South Africa works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | - | #28 | - | 12.1% | - | 6.9k |
| Arts and Humanities | - | #20 | - | 15.9% | - | 4.3k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | - | #31 | - | 9.4% | - | 3.7k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | - | #29 | - | 9.4% | - | 6.3k |
| Chemical Engineering | - | #32 | - | 7.1% | - | 301 |
| Chemistry | - | #38 | - | 10.4% | - | 1.4k |
| Computer Science | #81 | #32 | 4.4% | 10.9% | 210 | 5.6k |
| Decision Sciences | - | #26 | - | 9.6% | - | 1.8k |
| Dentistry | - | #39 | - | 8.8% | - | 243 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | - | #28 | - | 9.1% | - | 1.5k |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | - | #22 | - | 12.1% | - | 4.3k |
| Energy | - | #43 | - | 10.4% | - | 1.2k |
| Engineering | - | #36 | - | 8.6% | - | 11k |
| Environmental Science | #95 | #29 | 6.0% | 9.2% | 208 | 7.9k |
| Health Professions | - | #29 | - | 10.6% | - | 4.3k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | - | #24 | - | 11.1% | - | 978 |
| Materials Science | - | #32 | - | 9.1% | - | 2.7k |
| Mathematics | - | #28 | - | 11.5% | - | 1.3k |
| Medicine | #95 | #23 | 6.8% | 10.2% | 240 | 15k |
| Neuroscience | - | #37 | - | 9.2% | - | 690 |
| Nursing | - | #34 | - | 11.2% | - | 783 |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | - | #24 | - | 11.6% | - | 307 |
| Physics and Astronomy | - | #33 | - | 9.4% | - | 1.7k |
| Psychology | - | #24 | - | 9.1% | - | 4.6k |
| Social Sciences | #93 | #22 | 6.1% | 11.7% | 482 | 24k |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Namibia
- Gender Inequality
- Language Policy
- Animal Movement
- Multilingualism
- Poverty Reduction
- Community Health Workers
- Rural Development
- Job Satisfaction
- Colonialism
- Biodiversity
- Technology Integration
- Economic Development
- Social Capital
- Big Data
- Healthcare
- Renewable Energy
- Higher Education
- Artificial Intelligence
- Globalization
- Sustainability
- Climate Change
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
- Education
- Sustainable Development
- Mental Health
- Internet of Things
- Educational Technology
- Supply Chain Management
- Innovation
- Economic Growth
- Leadership
- Population Dynamics
- Lifelong Learning
- Habitat Selection
- Cloud Computing
- Trophic Cascades
- Student Perceptions
- Bilingual Education
- Occupancy Rates
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change142▲ 1.98×86 topics
- Sustainability137▲ 2.1×77 topics
- Machine Learning109▲ 1.25×64 topics
- Globalization101▲ 1.96×83 topics
- Deep Learning88◆ 0.97×63 topics
- Artificial Intelligence71▲ 1.89×38 topics
- Education66▲ 1.47×58 topics
- Higher Education65▲ 4.6×23 topics
- Sustainable Development65▲ 1.57×59 topics
- Renewable Energy62▲ 1.62×36 topics
- Mental Health60▲ 1.60×35 topics
- Healthcare59▲ 1.97×21 topics
- Internet of Things59▲ 2.6×22 topics
- Big Data58▲ 2.3×22 topics
- Educational Technology56▲ 1.80×29 topics
- Social Capital54▲ 4.0×17 topics
- Supply Chain Management54▲ 2.3×17 topics
- Economic Development50▲ 2.4×23 topics
- Innovation50▲ 1.82×44 topics
- Technology Integration48▲ 5.8×12 topics
- Economic Growth47▲ 2.2×26 topics
- Biodiversity46▲ 2.3×30 topics
- Leadership42▲ 3.2×21 topics
- Colonialism40▲ 3.2×16 topics
- Population Dynamics40▲ 5.8×10 topics
- Job Satisfaction39▲ 3.4×14 topics
- Lifelong Learning39▲ 7.2×9 topics
- Rural Development37▲ 4.1×13 topics
- Habitat Selection33▲ 17×2 topics
- Community Health Workers33▲ 14×2 topics
- Cloud Computing32▲ 4.3×12 topics
- Poverty Reduction32▲ 9.2×6 topics
- Trophic Cascades31▲ 13×2 topics
- Multilingualism31▲ 7.3×4 topics
- Student Perceptions28▲ 5.9×7 topics
- Animal Movement27▲ 20×1 topic
- Bilingual Education27▲ 8.9×3 topics
- Language Policy27▲ 7.4×3 topics
- Occupancy Rates27▲ 20×1 topic
- Gender Inequality24▲ 6.6×6 topics
South Africa
- NGOs
- post-apartheid
- Poverty Alleviation
- Socio-Economic Rights
- Legal Research
- Constitutionalism
- Gender-based Violence
- Race
- Poverty Reduction
- Environmental Governance
- Inequality
- Nationalism
- Social Capital
- Economic Growth
- Education
- Renewable Energy
- Environmental Impact
- Human Rights
- Globalization
- Sustainability
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Machine Learning
- Mental Health
- Higher Education
- Colonialism
- Sustainable Development
- Social Justice
- South Africa
- Development
- Antiretroviral Therapy
- Equality
- Public Participation
- Judicial Review
- Postcolonialism
- Consumer Protection
- Developmental Local Government
- Decolonization
- economic empowerment
- protests
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change4,986▲ 1.43×130 topics
- Sustainability4,915▲ 1.56×137 topics
- Epidemiology4,800◆ 0.94×140 topics
- Globalization4,533▲ 1.79×177 topics
- Machine Learning3,278▼ 0.77×97 topics
- Human Rights3,247▲ 2.5×88 topics
- Mental Health3,037▲ 1.65×48 topics
- Environmental Impact2,887▲ 1.32×72 topics
- Higher Education2,704▲ 4.0×34 topics
- Renewable Energy2,666▲ 1.43×61 topics
- Colonialism2,633▲ 4.3×49 topics
- Education2,535◆ 1.15×152 topics
- Sustainable Development2,520▲ 1.25×110 topics
- Economic Growth2,417▲ 2.3×37 topics
- Social Justice2,223▲ 2.9×53 topics
- Social Capital1,916▲ 2.9×21 topics
- South Africa1,591▲ 45×4 topics
- Nationalism1,540▲ 2.7×32 topics
- Development1,506▲ 3.3×23 topics
- Inequality1,451▲ 5.0×18 topics
- Antiretroviral Therapy1,327▲ 6.3×6 topics
- Environmental Governance1,301▲ 15×6 topics
- Equality1,234▲ 16×8 topics
- Poverty Reduction1,202▲ 7.2×7 topics
- Public Participation1,188▲ 42×3 topics
- Race1,174▲ 7.6×19 topics
- Judicial Review1,166▲ 11×5 topics
- Gender-based Violence1,164▲ 16×3 topics
- Postcolonialism1,160▲ 6.3×18 topics
- Constitutionalism1,141▲ 10×5 topics
- Consumer Protection1,141▲ 21×4 topics
- Legal Research1,128▲ 7.3×3 topics
- Developmental Local Government1,116▲ 84×1 topic
- Socio-Economic Rights1,116▲ 84×1 topic
- Decolonization974▲ 9.3×8 topics
- Poverty Alleviation928▲ 7.6×3 topics
- economic empowerment910▲ 44×2 topics
- post-apartheid910▲ 91×1 topic
- protests910▲ 91×1 topic
- NGOs883▲ 7.4×5 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
South Africa has out-published Namibia every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5002
- 0In the top 1,0004
- #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#31
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Namibia or South Africa?
South Africa publishes 49.1× as much research as Namibia in 2022-now (113k against 2.3k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Namibia or South Africa?
10.6% of South Africa's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 6.2% for Namibia.
Is Namibia or South Africa growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +43% against 2018-21 for Namibia, and +17% for South Africa.
Which has more open access research, Namibia or South Africa?
57% of Namibia's research is free to read, against 49% of South Africa's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Namibia or South Africa?
Namibia holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and South Africa 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 4.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Namibia
- 1University of Namibia5.5% top 10% · 1.4k works
- 2Namibia University of Science and Technology7.0% top 10% · 641 works
- 3International University of Management6.6% top 10% · 111 works
South Africa
- 1University of Cape Town10.9% top 10% · 7.2k works
- 2Stellenbosch University9.8% top 10% · 7.9k works
- 3University of the Witwatersrand10.5% top 10% · 8.9k works
- 4University of Johannesburg12.9% top 10% · 13k works
- 5University of Pretoria9.6% top 10% · 9k works
- 6University of South Africa10.9% top 10% · 9k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Namibia
- 1 Michael Sony #63,785 worldwide 6.2k citations · 191 works
- 2 Uchendu Eugene Chigbu #104,490 worldwide 2.1k citations · 87 works
- 3 Gillian Maggs‐Kölling #275,971 worldwide 2.7k citations · 102 works
- 4 Mary Seely #392,753 worldwide 5.9k citations · 164 works
- 5 Subhash S. Naik #540,111 worldwide 2k citations · 20 works
South Africa
- 1 Surajit Bag #6,981 worldwide 13k citations · 234 works
- 2 Christopher H. Trisos #8,500 worldwide 15k citations · 130 works
- 3 Osaretin Christabel Okonji #8,695 worldwide 39k citations · 121 works
- 4 Crick Lund #10,675 worldwide 34k citations · 524 works
- 5 Benn K. D. Sartorius #10,888 worldwide 208k citations · 402 works
Other comparisons
Czechiavs
South Africa
Portugalvs
South Africa
Brazilvs
South Africa
Irelandvs
South Africa
Saudi Arabiavs
South Africa
Hungaryvs
South Africa