Quantitative BioSciences vs Syracuse University
On research quality in 2022-now, Quantitative BioSciences ranks #595 in the world and Syracuse University #598, of 22,385 institutions. Quantitative BioSciences stands higher in 2 of the 15 fields both publish in, Syracuse University in 13.
Compare other institutions
Quantitative BioSciences
- World rank, 2022-now
- #595
- #478 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 906
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 15.2%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 64%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Structural Biology, Aging, Finance.
Syracuse University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #598
- #844 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 4.6k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 11.0%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 27%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Library and Information Sciences, Public Administration, Architecture.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Quantitative BioSciences leads on 7 of 8 measures: research quality, citation excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, open access, international co-authorship and growth. Syracuse University leads on 1 of 8 measures: output.
- #595Research qualityworld rank of 22,385 institutions, 2022-now#598
- 1.30×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.97×
- 906Outputfractional works, 2022-now4.6k
- 15.2%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited11.0%
- 27.1Citations per workall time, per fractional work26.1
- 64%Open accessof its works free to read, all time27%
- 41%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time10%
- +57%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change-6%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Quantitative BioSciences stands higher in 2 of 15 fields, Syracuse University in 13. Quantitative BioSciences leads most in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (#216 against #843). Each bar is that side's standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- -Agricultural and Biological Sciences#885
- -Arts and Humanities#525
- #216Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#843
- -Business, Management and Accounting#603
- -Computer Science#613
- -Earth and Planetary Sciences#409
- -Economics, Econometrics and Finance#411
- -Engineering#946
- -Environmental Science#969
- -Health Professions#505
- -Mathematics#458
- #568Medicine#1,225
- -Physics and Astronomy#374
- -Psychology#292
- -Social Sciences#302
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Quantitative BioSciences rank | Syracuse University rank | Quantitative BioSciences top 10% | Syracuse University top 10% | Quantitative BioSciences works | Syracuse University works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | - | #885 | - | 13.1% | - | 62 |
| Arts and Humanities | - | #525 | - | 10.3% | - | 228 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #216 | #843 | 13.0% | 10.0% | 175 | 148 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | - | #603 | - | 15.5% | - | 137 |
| Computer Science | - | #613 | - | 9.4% | - | 302 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | - | #409 | - | 8.9% | - | 116 |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | - | #411 | - | 11.1% | - | 152 |
| Engineering | - | #946 | - | 9.2% | - | 391 |
| Environmental Science | - | #969 | - | 12.1% | - | 176 |
| Health Professions | - | #505 | - | 12.9% | - | 114 |
| Mathematics | - | #458 | - | 10.3% | - | 61 |
| Medicine | #568 | #1,225 | 15.1% | 9.7% | 145 | 300 |
| Physics and Astronomy | - | #374 | - | 11.2% | - | 125 |
| Psychology | - | #292 | - | 12.7% | - | 306 |
| Social Sciences | - | #302 | - | 13.5% | - | 1k |
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world's share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Immunology and Microbiology2.4× 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology4.4× 0.8×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.1× 0.2×
- Veterinary1.2× 0.2×
- Medicine1.0× 0.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.8× 0.3×
- Decision Sciences3.0× 1.5×
- Neuroscience2.1× 1.1×
- Chemistry1.0× 0.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance2.5× 1.7×
- Dentistry0.1× 0.0×
- Mathematics1.8× 1.3×
- Chemical Engineering0.5× 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting1.1× 1.1×
- Materials Science0.4× 0.5×
- Nursing0.4× 0.5×
- Energy0.6× 0.7×
- Environmental Science0.7× 0.9×
- Health Professions0.8× 1.1×
- Computer Science0.7× 1.0×
- Physics and Astronomy0.9× 1.4×
- Psychology1.4× 2.7×
- Engineering0.3× 0.7×
- Social Sciences0.5× 2.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.3× 1.8×
- Arts and Humanities0.2× 2.1×
Location quotient in 2022-now: the share of each side's research in the field over the world's share. 1× is the world's balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Quantitative BioSciences leans further are at the top, Syracuse University's at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Quantitative BioSciences
- Subjective Well-Being
- Life Satisfaction
- Positive Emotions
- RNA Structure
- Positive Psychology
- Translation
- Stock Returns
- Chromatin
- Mutation
- Animal Breeding
- Plant Breeding
- Asset Pricing
- Gene Regulation
- Marker-Assisted Selection
- Well-being
- Genetic Diversity
- Population Genetics
- Mental Health
- Cancer
- Machine Learning
- Epidemiology
- Deep Learning
- Inflammation
- Oxidative Stress
- Gene Expression
- Social Support
- Genome-Wide Association
- Molecular Dynamics
- Genomics
- Evolution
- Quantitative Genetics
- Genomic Selection
- Market Efficiency
- Investor Sentiment
- Genetic Code
- RNA-Seq
- Protein
- Ribosome
- Prediction
- Sentiment Analysis
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology40◆ 1.11×94 topics
- Machine Learning38▲ 1.26×51 topics
- Deep Learning32◆ 1.03×45 topics
- Cancer25▲ 2.0×42 topics
- Inflammation24▲ 1.27×67 topics
- Mental Health24▲ 1.83×28 topics
- Oxidative Stress21▲ 1.40×43 topics
- Population Genetics20▲ 16×5 topics
- Gene Expression16▲ 2.9×17 topics
- Genetic Diversity16▲ 4.0×9 topics
- Social Support14▲ 2.8×11 topics
- Well-being14▲ 3.8×9 topics
- Genome-Wide Association13▲ 19×2 topics
- Marker-Assisted Selection13▲ 19×2 topics
- Molecular Dynamics13▲ 8.2×6 topics
- Gene Regulation12▲ 14×4 topics
- Genomics12▲ 4.7×8 topics
- Asset Pricing12▲ 16×3 topics
- Evolution12▲ 4.8×10 topics
- Plant Breeding12▲ 14×3 topics
- Quantitative Genetics11▲ 24×2 topics
- Animal Breeding11▲ 29×1 topic
- Genomic Selection11▲ 29×1 topic
- Mutation11▲ 6.5×5 topics
- Market Efficiency10▲ 17×2 topics
- Chromatin10▲ 23×2 topics
- Investor Sentiment10▲ 25×1 topic
- Stock Returns10▲ 25×1 topic
- Genetic Code10▲ 15×2 topics
- Translation9▲ 6.3×3 topics
- RNA-Seq9▲ 8.5×2 topics
- Positive Psychology9▲ 13×3 topics
- Protein9▲ 8.1×3 topics
- RNA Structure9▲ 19×1 topic
- Ribosome9▲ 19×1 topic
- Positive Emotions9▲ 8.6×2 topics
- Prediction9▲ 12×2 topics
- Life Satisfaction9▲ 14×2 topics
- Sentiment Analysis8▲ 8.2×2 topics
- Subjective Well-Being8▲ 12×2 topics
Syracuse University
- Relationships
- Neighborhood Effects
- Cultural Competence
- Race
- Emotion
- Discrimination
- Intersectionality
- Health Disparities
- Feminism
- History
- Democracy
- Neoliberalism
- Colonialism
- Innovation
- Human Rights
- Social Support
- Sustainability
- Deep Learning
- Social Media
- Globalization
- Mental Health
- Machine Learning
- Climate Change
- Identity
- Gender
- Public Health
- Education
- Ethics
- Emotion Regulation
- Nationalism
- Social Justice
- Resilience
- Religion
- Social Capital
- Digital Divide
- Labor Market
- Politics
- Online Communication
- Public Opinion
- Attachment
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Mental Health189▲ 2.9×38 topics
- Globalization183▲ 2.0×100 topics
- Machine Learning162◆ 1.07×81 topics
- Social Media152▲ 2.4×35 topics
- Climate Change151▲ 1.22×84 topics
- Deep Learning110▼ 0.70×72 topics
- Identity103▲ 3.1×53 topics
- Sustainability102◆ 0.92×75 topics
- Gender99▲ 4.1×44 topics
- Social Support98▲ 4.0×15 topics
- Public Health86▲ 1.30×46 topics
- Human Rights86▲ 1.85×54 topics
- Education85◆ 1.08×67 topics
- Innovation74▲ 1.59×45 topics
- Ethics74▲ 3.2×30 topics
- Colonialism72▲ 3.3×35 topics
- Emotion Regulation63▲ 4.4×9 topics
- Neoliberalism61▲ 3.7×23 topics
- Nationalism59▲ 2.9×26 topics
- Democracy58▲ 3.6×25 topics
- Social Justice57▲ 2.1×34 topics
- History57▲ 1.80×39 topics
- Resilience56▲ 2.5×14 topics
- Feminism55▲ 4.2×19 topics
- Religion55▲ 2.6×26 topics
- Health Disparities54▲ 4.6×8 topics
- Social Capital52▲ 2.2×16 topics
- Intersectionality52▲ 6.0×13 topics
- Digital Divide47▲ 4.0×7 topics
- Discrimination47▲ 4.9×8 topics
- Labor Market46▲ 3.6×14 topics
- Emotion41▲ 4.3×11 topics
- Politics41▲ 3.4×19 topics
- Race37▲ 6.8×17 topics
- Online Communication35▲ 5.1×3 topics
- Cultural Competence34▲ 5.8×7 topics
- Public Opinion32▲ 5.9×6 topics
- Neighborhood Effects32▲ 6.6×3 topics
- Attachment29▲ 7.4×3 topics
- Relationships28▲ 15×2 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Syracuse University has out-published Quantitative BioSciences every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Which publishes more research, Quantitative BioSciences or Syracuse University?
Syracuse University publishes 5.0× as much research as Quantitative BioSciences in 2022-now (4.6k against 906 fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Quantitative BioSciences or Syracuse University?
15.2% of Quantitative BioSciences's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 11.0% for Syracuse University.
Is Quantitative BioSciences or Syracuse University growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +57% against 2018-21 for Quantitative BioSciences, and -6% for Syracuse University.
Which has more open access research, Quantitative BioSciences or Syracuse University?
64% of Quantitative BioSciences's research is free to read, against 27% of Syracuse University's.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Quantitative BioSciences
- 1 Noah Greifer #718,870 worldwide 2.5k citations · 74 works
- 2 Seth Ariel Green #848,624 worldwide 1.1k citations · 27 works
- 3 J. N. K. Rao #893,555 worldwide 2.1k citations · 66 works
- 4 Abe Schwartz #1,063,741 worldwide 999 citations · 21 works
- 5 Matthew K. Howard #1,083,079 worldwide 239 citations · 18 works
Syracuse University
- 1 S. W. Ballmer #7,422 worldwide 48k citations · 98 works
- 2 C. Biwer #8,769 worldwide 45k citations · 66 works
- 3 Peter R. Saulson #10,185 worldwide 75k citations · 223 works
- 4 L. Pekowsky #10,217 worldwide 62k citations · 139 works
- 5 S. Ballmer #11,056 worldwide 19k citations · 188 works