Association for Symbolic Logic
In research, Association for Symbolic Logic stands highest in Social Sciences (#5,060 of 14,833 worldwide), Social Sciences (#4,364 of 9,330 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#11,417 of 17,446 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #10,523 of 22,385 · #10,636 all time
- Rank in United States
- #1,452 of 3,332
- Research works
- 711 ▲ 53% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 8.2k 11.6 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.1% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.96× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 50% world 40%
- International
- 40% world 18%
What is Association for Symbolic Logic known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #5,060 of 14,833 | 9.7% | 307 | |
| Social SciencesField | #4,364 of 9,330 | 8.9% | 149 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #11,417 of 17,446 | 12.3% | 160 | |
| MedicineField | #9,743 of 14,558 | 7.9% | 144 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #11,549 of 16,688 | 8.0% | 188 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Association for Symbolic Logic sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Association for Symbolic Logic work in?
In 2022-now, 46% of research at Association for Symbolic Logic is in Social Sciences, 24% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (25%), Medicine (19%), Engineering (9%). It does 1.8× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences8245.7%
- Social Sciences4625.4%
- Arts and Humanities137.4%
- Psychology105.7%
- Business, Management and Accounting94.7%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance42.2%
- Decision Sciences10.3%
- Health Sciences4324.0%
- Medicine3418.8%
- Health Professions84.6%
- Nursing10.6%
- Dentistry00.1%
- Veterinary00.0%
- Physical Sciences3922.0%
- Engineering168.7%
- Computer Science105.4%
- Environmental Science74.0%
- Materials Science31.5%
- Mathematics21.0%
- Chemistry10.6%
- Physics and Astronomy10.4%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences00.3%
- Energy00.1%
- Chemical Engineering00.0%
- Life Sciences158.2%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 2.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Arts and Humanities2.56×13 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.30×2 works
- Social Sciences2.01×46 works
- Psychology1.87×10 works
- Health Professions1.73×8 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.47×8 works
- Nursing1.14×1 works
- Immunology and Microbiology1.07×2 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.02×4 works
- Medicine0.98×34 works
- Mathematics0.88×2 works
- Environmental Science0.80×7 works
- Neuroscience0.78×2 works
- Computer Science0.69×10 works
- Engineering0.58×16 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.52×4 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.49×5 works
- Materials Science0.44×3 works
- Chemistry0.40×1 works
- Decision Sciences0.32×1 works
- Dentistry0.25×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.17×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.17×1 works
- Chemical Engineering0.13×0 works
- Veterinary0.10×0 works
- Energy0.08×0 works
- Arts and Humanities 2.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.3×
- Social Sciences 2.0×
- Psychology 1.9×
- Health Professions 1.7×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.5×
- Nursing 1.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.0×
- Medicine 1.0×
- Mathematics 0.9×
- Environmental Science 0.8×
- Neuroscience 0.8×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Engineering 0.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.5×
- Materials Science 0.4×
- Chemistry 0.4×
- Decision Sciences 0.3×
- Dentistry 0.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
- Veterinary 0.1×
- Energy 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Association for Symbolic Logic?
Ranked on the quality score, Robert M Solovay, Stephen Cole Kleene and Pierre J. Bancel lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Association for Symbolic Logic.
- 1
Robert M Solovay
United States · #805,050 worldwide 4.2k citations · 198 works
- 2
Stephen Cole Kleene
United States · #1,918,687 worldwide 1.4k citations · 155 works
- 3
Pierre J. Bancel
United States · #3,941,792 worldwide 18 citations · 18 works
- 4
María Goretti
United States · #5,217,535 worldwide 64 citations · 35 works
- 5
Paul Murad
United States · #6,816,625 worldwide 167 citations · 64 works
Which keywords describe research at Association for Symbolic Logic?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Globalization, Sustainability, Epidemiology, Education, Inclusion, Language Teaching, Social Inequality and Public Health.
- Bilingualism
- Diplomacy
- Research Methods
- Environmental Education
- Sociology
- Social Work
- Community Engagement
- Waste Management
- Religion
- Health Promotion
- Cultural Studies
- Pedagogy
- Identity
- Public Policy
- Inclusion
- Healthcare
- Qualitative Research
- Sustainable Development
- Education
- Sustainability
- Epidemiology
- Globalization
- Public Health
- Quality of Life
- COVID-19
- Human Rights
- Gender
- Risk Factors
- Language Teaching
- Social Inequality
- Teacher Training
- Philosophy
- Language
- Migration
- Democracy
- Cultural Diversity
- Teaching Methods
- Empowerment
- Social Change
- Tourism Development
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology11▲ 1.50×56 topics
- Sustainability10▲ 2.2×24 topics
- Globalization9▲ 2.7×23 topics
- Education8▲ 2.5×26 topics
- Public Health6▲ 2.3×28 topics
- Sustainable Development5▲ 1.70×13 topics
- Quality of Life5▲ 1.82×26 topics
- Qualitative Research5▲ 3.0×15 topics
- COVID-194▲ 1.85×15 topics
- Healthcare4▲ 2.1×12 topics
- Human Rights4▲ 2.3×13 topics
- Inclusion4▲ 16×6 topics
- Gender4▲ 4.2×10 topics
- Public Policy4▲ 4.6×11 topics
- Risk Factors4▲ 1.97×15 topics
- Identity4▲ 2.9×9 topics
- Language Teaching4▲ 7.6×4 topics
- Pedagogy4▲ 3.9×9 topics
- Social Inequality4▲ 7.3×6 topics
- Cultural Studies3▲ 4.9×7 topics
- Teacher Training3▲ 2.9×8 topics
- Health Promotion3▲ 5.1×10 topics
- Philosophy3▲ 3.6×6 topics
- Religion3▲ 3.5×5 topics
- Language3▲ 6.4×5 topics
- Waste Management3▲ 3.9×3 topics
- Migration3▲ 4.5×5 topics
- Community Engagement3▲ 4.4×8 topics
- Democracy3▲ 4.2×3 topics
- Social Work3▲ 22×3 topics
- Cultural Diversity2▲ 6.0×4 topics
- Sociology2▲ 9.6×3 topics
- Teaching Methods2▲ 8.4×3 topics
- Environmental Education2▲ 8.4×5 topics
- Empowerment2▲ 12×2 topics
- Research Methods2▲ 7.8×3 topics
- Social Change2▲ 9.4×4 topics
- Diplomacy2▲ 12×2 topics
- Tourism Development2▲ 8.2×2 topics
- Bilingualism2▲ 7.8×4 topics
Which research topics does Association for Symbolic Logic publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Dutch Social and Cultural Studies, Environmental Sustainability and Education, Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection and Fashion and Cultural Textiles.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Dutch Social and Cultural Studies Education 2 works
- 2 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2 works
- 3 Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 2 works
- 4 Fashion and Cultural Textiles Museology 2 works
- 5 Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 6 EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Language and Linguistics 1 works
- 7 Workplace Health and Well-being General Health Professions 1 works
- 8 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 1 works
- 9 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 1 works
- 10 Education, Innovation and Language Studies Education 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Association for Symbolic Logic's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 53% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Association for Symbolic Logic as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00058% in 2024.
Fractional works of Association for Symbolic Logic over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 18.5% in 2001.
Other research institutions in Storrs
- University of Connecticut
- POET Technologies (United States)
- Dura Biotech (United States)
- Biorasis (United States)
- Solution Spray Technologies (United states)
- EpitoGenesis (United States)
- International Studies Association
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Association for Symbolic Logic. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
