Fontys University of Applied Sciences
In research, Fontys University of Applied Sciences stands highest in Social Sciences (#2,856 of 10,521 worldwide), Health Sciences (#4,094 of 11,982 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#4,100 of 6,365 worldwide), 2022–2025.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #9,314 of 28,054 · #10,569 all time
- Rank in Netherlands
- #76 of 237
- Research works
- 993 ▲ 30% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 22k 22.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 23.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 51% world 28%
What is Fontys University of Applied Sciences known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #2,856 of 10,521 | 26.1% | 118 | #2327 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #4,094 of 11,982 | 23.4% | 61 | #6323 | |
| Social SciencesField | #4,100 of 6,365 | 24.9% | 65 | #2655 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Fontys University of Applied Sciences sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#2,327 #2,856
- Health Sciences#6,323 #4,094
- Social Sciences#2,655 #4,100
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 3.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 3.5×
- Nursing 3.3×
- Health Professions 3.3×
- Social Sciences 2.2×
- Decision Sciences 2.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.8×
- Veterinary 1.2×
- Neuroscience 1.2×
- Computer Science 1.1×
- Medicine 0.8×
- Arts and Humanities 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.5×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Environmental Science 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.2×
- Energy 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.0×
- Mathematics 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Fontys University of Applied Sciences?
Ranked on the composite score, Robert Schuwer, Joost van Hoof and Eveline Wouters lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Fontys University of Applied Sciences.
- 1 Robert Schuwer Netherlands · #234,101 worldwide 115 citations · 18 works
- 2 Joost van Hoof Netherlands · #364,121 worldwide 196 citations · 70 works
- 3 Eveline Wouters Netherlands · #460,043 worldwide 58 citations · 30 works
- 4 Bart Wernaart Netherlands · #536,432 worldwide 2 citations · 27 works
- 5 Eric Verbiest Netherlands · #729,447 worldwide 17 citations · 15 works
- 6 Hanno van Keulen Netherlands · #734,316 worldwide 25 citations · 17 works
- 7 Anouke Bakx Netherlands · #809,669 worldwide 45 citations · 30 works
- 8 Isabelle Diepstraten Netherlands · #858,814 worldwide 12 citations · 20 works
- 9 Pieterbas Lalleman Netherlands · #889,165 worldwide 2 citations · 16 works
- 10 Tim Huijgen Netherlands · #952,524 worldwide 0 citations · 20 works
Which keywords describe research at Fontys University of Applied Sciences?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Education, Health Promotion, Professionalism, Inclusion, Teacher Development, Social Work, Cultural Diversity and Empowerment.
- Transparency
- Qualitative Research Methods
- Professional Learning Communities
- Intrinsic Motivation
- Digital Divide
- Technology Integration
- Lifelong Learning
- Reflective Practice
- Health Equity
- Emotion
- Innovation
- Healthcare
- Social Support
- Globalization
- Youth Care
- Empowerment
- Social Work
- Inclusion
- Professionalism
- Health Promotion
- Education
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Teacher Development
- Cultural Diversity
- Research Methods
- Sustainability
- Artificial Intelligence
- Big Data
- Physical Activity
- Motivation
- Self-Regulation
- Well-being
- Aging
- Participatory Design
- Health Behavior Change
- Social Relationships
- Design Research
- User Experience
- Teacher Professional Development
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Education17▲ 4.0×19 topics
- Health Promotion12▲ 15×8 topics
- Public Health12▲ 3.3×22 topics
- Professionalism10▲ 25×4 topics
- Epidemiology10◆ 1.07×28 topics
- Inclusion10▲ 29×6 topics
- Teacher Development10▲ 65×2 topics
- Social Work10▲ 56×3 topics
- Cultural Diversity9▲ 17×3 topics
- Empowerment9▲ 39×2 topics
- Research Methods8▲ 22×1 topic
- Youth Care8▲ 998×1 topic
- Sustainability8▲ 1.42×20 topics
- Globalization8▲ 1.66×20 topics
- Artificial Intelligence8▲ 2.3×11 topics
- Social Support7▲ 5.5×10 topics
- Big Data7▲ 3.3×9 topics
- Healthcare6▲ 2.4×10 topics
- Physical Activity6▲ 5.1×7 topics
- Innovation6▲ 2.3×10 topics
- Motivation6▲ 5.8×5 topics
- Emotion5▲ 10×6 topics
- Self-Regulation5▲ 12×4 topics
- Health Equity5▲ 7.7×4 topics
- Well-being5▲ 5.5×7 topics
- Reflective Practice5▲ 11×5 topics
- Aging5▲ 3.8×7 topics
- Lifelong Learning5▲ 9.7×4 topics
- Participatory Design4▲ 35×2 topics
- Technology Integration4▲ 5.9×5 topics
- Health Behavior Change4▲ 35×2 topics
- Digital Divide4▲ 6.4×5 topics
- Social Relationships4▲ 18×2 topics
- Intrinsic Motivation4▲ 14×4 topics
- Design Research4▲ 56×1 topic
- Professional Learning Communities4▲ 32×2 topics
- User Experience4▲ 18×1 topic
- Qualitative Research Methods3▲ 37×1 topic
- Teacher Professional Development3▲ 8.6×1 topic
- Transparency3▲ 11×2 topics
Which research topics does Fontys University of Applied Sciences publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Dutch Social and Cultural Studies, Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Teacher Education and Leadership Studies and Technology Use by Older Adults.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Dutch Social and Cultural Studies Education 8 works
- 2 Innovative Human-Technology Interaction Human-Computer Interaction 4 works
- 3 Teacher Education and Leadership Studies Education 3 works
- 4 Technology Use by Older Adults Demography 3 works
- 5 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 3 works
- 6 Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods Developmental and Educational Psychology 2 works
- 7 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Health Informatics 2 works
- 8 Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports Social Psychology 2 works
- 9 Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research Psychiatry and Mental health 2 works
- 10 Health disparities and outcomes Health 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Fontys University of Applied Sciences's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 30% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Eindhoven
- Eindhoven University of Technology
- NXP (Netherlands)
- Catharina Ziekenhuis
- Imec the Netherlands
- Dutch Polymer Institute
- Holst Centre (Netherlands)
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation
- Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.