Fontys University of Applied Sciences
In research, Fontys University of Applied Sciences stands highest in Social Sciences (#4,802 of 9,585 worldwide), Health Sciences (#6,978 of 9,902 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#4,554 of 5,988 worldwide), 2022-now.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #7,234 of 22,385 · #6,783 all time
- Rank in Netherlands
- #60 of 197
- Research works
- 993 ▼ 14% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 22k 22.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 11.9% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.01× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 51% world 40%
- International
- 23% world 18%
What is Fontys University of Applied Sciences known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #4,802 of 9,585 | 12.8% | 118 | #4275 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #6,978 of 9,902 | 13.6% | 61 | #6903 | |
| Social SciencesField | #4,554 of 5,988 | 11.4% | 65 | #3635 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Fontys University of Applied Sciences sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#4,275 #4,802
- Health Sciences#6,903 #6,978
- Social Sciences#3,635 #4,554
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Which fields of science does Fontys University of Applied Sciences work in?
In 2022-now, 50% of research at Fontys University of Applied Sciences is in Social Sciences, 25% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (27%), Medicine (15%), Psychology (10%). It does 2.0× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 23 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences12849.6%
- Social Sciences7127.5%
- Psychology2710.4%
- Business, Management and Accounting155.6%
- Arts and Humanities72.9%
- Decision Sciences52.1%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance31.1%
- Health Sciences6625.4%
- Medicine4015.4%
- Health Professions228.4%
- Nursing41.5%
- Veterinary00.1%
- Physical Sciences4919.1%
- Computer Science238.8%
- Engineering187.1%
- Environmental Science62.2%
- Physics and Astronomy10.6%
- Materials Science10.3%
- Energy00.1%
- Chemistry00.1%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences00.0%
- Mathematics00.0%
- Life Sciences155.8%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 3.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 23 fields, with their numbers
- Psychology3.42×27 works
- Health Professions3.19×22 works
- Nursing3.11×4 works
- Decision Sciences2.17×5 works
- Social Sciences2.17×71 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.75×14 works
- Computer Science1.13×23 works
- Neuroscience1.08×4 works
- Veterinary1.08×0 works
- Arts and Humanities1.00×8 works
- Medicine0.80×40 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.50×3 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.48×6 works
- Engineering0.47×18 works
- Environmental Science0.43×6 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.30×4 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.26×2 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.22×1 works
- Energy0.11×0 works
- Materials Science0.09×1 works
- Chemistry0.04×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.03×0 works
- Mathematics0.03×0 works
- Psychology 3.4×
- Health Professions 3.2×
- Nursing 3.1×
- Decision Sciences 2.2×
- Social Sciences 2.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.8×
- Computer Science 1.1×
- Neuroscience 1.1×
- Veterinary 1.1×
- Arts and Humanities 1.0×
- Medicine 0.8×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Environmental Science 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.2×
- Energy 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.0×
- Mathematics 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Fontys University of Applied Sciences?
Ranked on the quality score, Linda van den Bergh, Anje Ros and Paul Hennissen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Fontys University of Applied Sciences.
- 1
Linda van den Bergh
Netherlands · #451,224 worldwide 1.4k citations · 17 works
- 2
Anje Ros
Netherlands · #643,713 worldwide 855 citations · 42 works
- 3
Paul Hennissen
Netherlands · #688,608 worldwide 1.3k citations · 50 works
- 4
Yvonne van Zaalen
Netherlands · #923,708 worldwide 828 citations · 40 works
- 5
Eveline J. M. Wouters
Netherlands · #974,783 worldwide 24k citations · 201 works
- 6
Robert Schuwer
Netherlands · #1,111,556 worldwide 2.2k citations · 70 works
- 7
Theo Niessen
Netherlands · #1,182,276 worldwide 791 citations · 37 works
- 8
Anne J. M. Loonen
Netherlands · #1,242,772 worldwide 1.1k citations · 26 works
- 9
Marian Thunnissen
Netherlands · #1,302,096 worldwide 2.2k citations · 86 works
- 10
Shaun Cardiff
Netherlands · #1,368,640 worldwide 706 citations · 40 works
Which keywords describe research at Fontys University of Applied Sciences?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Education, Health Promotion, Professionalism, Inclusion, Teacher Development, Social Work, Cultural Diversity and Empowerment.
- Teacher Professional Development
- Professional Learning Communities
- Academic Achievement
- Social Relationships
- Digital Divide
- Health Behavior Change
- Well-being
- Lifelong Learning
- Reflective Practice
- Health Equity
- Physical Activity
- Healthcare
- Globalization
- Artificial Intelligence
- Research Methods
- Cultural Diversity
- Social Work
- Inclusion
- Epidemiology
- Health Promotion
- Education
- Public Health
- Professionalism
- Teacher Development
- Machine Learning
- Empowerment
- Youth Care
- Big Data
- Social Support
- Motivation
- Emotion
- Self-Regulation
- Technology Integration
- Participatory Design
- Ethics
- Design Research
- Intrinsic Motivation
- User Experience
- Transparency
- Qualitative Research Methods
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Education18▲ 4.1×21 topics
- Health Promotion13▲ 16×8 topics
- Public Health12▲ 3.1×22 topics
- Epidemiology11◆ 1.07×31 topics
- Professionalism11▲ 25×4 topics
- Inclusion11▲ 28×6 topics
- Teacher Development10▲ 64×2 topics
- Social Work10▲ 59×3 topics
- Machine Learning10▲ 1.16×20 topics
- Cultural Diversity10▲ 17×3 topics
- Empowerment10▲ 38×2 topics
- Research Methods9▲ 23×1 topic
- Youth Care9▲ 958×1 topic
- Artificial Intelligence9▲ 2.4×12 topics
- Big Data8▲ 3.4×9 topics
- Globalization8▲ 1.62×20 topics
- Social Support7▲ 5.2×10 topics
- Healthcare7▲ 2.4×10 topics
- Motivation6▲ 6.0×6 topics
- Physical Activity6▲ 4.8×7 topics
- Emotion6▲ 11×7 topics
- Health Equity6▲ 7.4×4 topics
- Self-Regulation5▲ 12×4 topics
- Reflective Practice5▲ 11×5 topics
- Technology Integration5▲ 6.2×5 topics
- Lifelong Learning5▲ 9.5×4 topics
- Participatory Design5▲ 37×2 topics
- Well-being5▲ 5.0×7 topics
- Ethics5▲ 3.7×6 topics
- Health Behavior Change5▲ 34×2 topics
- Design Research4▲ 55×1 topic
- Digital Divide4▲ 5.9×5 topics
- Intrinsic Motivation4▲ 13×4 topics
- Social Relationships4▲ 17×2 topics
- User Experience4▲ 19×1 topic
- Academic Achievement4▲ 8.5×6 topics
- Transparency4▲ 10×2 topics
- Professional Learning Communities4▲ 28×2 topics
- Qualitative Research Methods3▲ 32×1 topic
- Teacher Professional Development3▲ 8.2×1 topic
Which research topics does Fontys University of Applied Sciences publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Dutch Social and Cultural Studies, Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Teacher Education and Leadership Studies and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Dutch Social and Cultural Studies Education 9 works
- 2 Innovative Human-Technology Interaction Human-Computer Interaction 4 works
- 3 Teacher Education and Leadership Studies Education 3 works
- 4 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 3 works
- 5 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Health Informatics 3 works
- 6 Technology Use by Older Adults Demography 3 works
- 7 Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods Developmental and Educational Psychology 2 works
- 8 Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports Social Psychology 2 works
- 9 Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research Psychiatry and Mental health 2 works
- 10 Health disparities and outcomes Health 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Fontys University of Applied Sciences's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 14% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Fontys University of Applied Sciences as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00087% in 2024.
Fractional works of Fontys University of Applied Sciences over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 20.4% in 2010.
Other research institutions in Eindhoven
- Eindhoven University of Technology
- NXP (Netherlands)
- Catharina Ziekenhuis
- Dutch Polymer Institute
- Holst Centre (Netherlands)
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation
- Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research
- Center for Translational Molecular Medicine
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Fontys University of Applied Sciences. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
