ING Direct
In research, ING Direct stands highest in Social Sciences (#4,356 of 9,585 worldwide), Physical Sciences (#8,845 of 10,670 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#9,084 of 9,902 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Civil and Structural Engineering (Civil and Structural Engineering is 7.4× its share of world research).
- World rank, 2022-now
- #8,490 of 22,385 · #11,160 all time
- Rank in United States
- #1,144 of 3,332
- Research works
- 2.3k ▲ 24% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 11k 4.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 5.5% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.73× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 18% world 40%
- International
- 8% world 18%
What is ING Direct known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #4,356 of 9,585 | 4.8% | 125 | #5612 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #8,845 of 10,670 | 3.6% | 153 | #14726 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #9,084 of 9,902 | 7.0% | 63 | #11591 | |
| EngineeringField | #5,801 of 5,901 | 4.8% | 86 | #8429 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where ING Direct sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#5,612 #4,356
- Physical Sciences#14,726 #8,845
- Health Sciences#11,591 #9,084
- Engineering#8,429 #5,801
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Which fields of science does ING Direct work in?
In 2022-now, 42% of research at ING Direct is in Physical Sciences, 34% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (24%), Social Sciences (12%), Medicine (12%). It does 1.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Physical Sciences17241.7%
- Engineering9723.6%
- Environmental Science256.2%
- Computer Science194.7%
- Energy163.8%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences51.3%
- Materials Science40.9%
- Physics and Astronomy20.5%
- Chemistry20.5%
- Mathematics10.2%
- Chemical Engineering00.1%
- Social Sciences13933.6%
- Social Sciences5112.5%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance296.9%
- Business, Management and Accounting266.2%
- Arts and Humanities174.2%
- Psychology81.9%
- Decision Sciences81.9%
- Health Sciences7618.5%
- Medicine4811.7%
- Health Professions266.4%
- Nursing10.2%
- Dentistry00.1%
- Veterinary00.1%
- Life Sciences266.2%
What does ING Direct specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Civil and Structural Engineering takes 7.4× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Civil and Structural EngineeringSubfield · 35.9 works7.4×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Energy, 4.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Energy4.18×16 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance3.24×29 works
- Health Professions2.43×26 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.92×26 works
- Decision Sciences1.91×8 works
- Engineering1.57×97 works
- Arts and Humanities1.46×17 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.42×2 works
- Environmental Science1.24×25 works
- Social Sciences0.99×51 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.81×5 works
- Psychology0.63×8 works
- Medicine0.61×48 works
- Computer Science0.60×19 works
- Veterinary0.59×0 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.53×2 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.50×10 works
- Neuroscience0.47×3 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.37×8 works
- Nursing0.37×1 works
- Chemical Engineering0.35×0 works
- Chemistry0.31×2 works
- Materials Science0.25×4 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.22×2 works
- Dentistry0.17×0 works
- Mathematics0.16×1 works
- Energy 4.2×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3.2×
- Health Professions 2.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.9×
- Decision Sciences 1.9×
- Engineering 1.6×
- Arts and Humanities 1.5×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 1.4×
- Environmental Science 1.2×
- Social Sciences 1.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.8×
- Psychology 0.6×
- Medicine 0.6×
- Computer Science 0.6×
- Veterinary 0.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Neuroscience 0.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.4×
- Nursing 0.4×
- Chemical Engineering 0.3×
- Chemistry 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Dentistry 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at ING Direct?
Ranked on the quality score, Annette Flanagin, Kate Schweitzer and John K. Iglehart lead among researchers whose main affiliation is ING Direct.
- 1
Annette Flanagin
United States · #324,296 worldwide 6.2k citations · 365 works
- 2
Kate Schweitzer
United States · #1,155,692 worldwide 115 citations · 40 works
- 3
John K. Iglehart
United States · #1,655,089 worldwide 9.8k citations · 402 works
- 4
Madeleine Ginsburg
United States · #2,617,119 worldwide 181 citations · 25 works
- 5
Tom Stewart
United States · #2,724,922 worldwide 41 citations · 68 works
- 6
Isaac Gagné
United States · #2,875,468 worldwide 113 citations · 28 works
- 7
Dale Liu
United States · #3,302,557 worldwide 16 citations · 24 works
- 8
Rishab Aiyer Ghosh
United States · #3,346,165 worldwide 1.1k citations · 65 works
- 9
John Ozimek
United States · #3,407,472 worldwide 342 citations · 40 works
- 10
Pallab Bandyopadhyay
United States · #3,437,058 worldwide 7 citations · 74 works
Which keywords describe research at ING Direct?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Sustainability, Climate Change, Renewable Energy, Liquefaction, Tunnel, Energy Transition, Analysis and Monetary Policy.
- Fracture Propagation
- Policy
- Patient
- Ethical Implications
- Financial Analysis
- Health Information Management
- Ensemble Kalman Filter
- Seismic
- Peak Oil
- Fossil Fuels
- Asset Pricing
- Soil Reinforcement
- Geosynthetics
- Mental Health
- Artificial Intelligence
- Liquefaction
- Innovation
- Healthcare
- Public Health
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Renewable Energy
- Globalization
- Big Data
- Energy Transition
- Tunnel
- Analysis
- Optimization
- Monetary Policy
- Economic Evaluation
- Pipeline
- EROI
- Earthquake
- Data Assimilation
- Primary Care
- Market Competition
- Panel Data Models
- Client
- Hydraulic Fracturing
- India
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability32▲ 3.2×28 topics
- Climate Change26▲ 2.4×28 topics
- Renewable Energy20▲ 3.4×11 topics
- Public Health15▲ 2.5×22 topics
- Globalization14▲ 1.70×29 topics
- Healthcare13▲ 2.7×13 topics
- Big Data13▲ 3.2×8 topics
- Innovation12▲ 2.9×19 topics
- Energy Transition12▲ 19×3 topics
- Liquefaction12▲ 34×2 topics
- Tunnel12▲ 34×2 topics
- Artificial Intelligence11▲ 1.93×15 topics
- Analysis11▲ 30×3 topics
- Mental Health11▲ 1.91×12 topics
- Optimization10▲ 5.6×2 topics
- Geosynthetics10▲ 50×1 topic
- Monetary Policy10▲ 11×4 topics
- Soil Reinforcement10▲ 38×1 topic
- Economic Evaluation10▲ 21×3 topics
- Asset Pricing10▲ 29×2 topics
- Pipeline10▲ 24×3 topics
- Fossil Fuels10▲ 51×2 topics
- EROI10▲ 72×1 topic
- Peak Oil10▲ 72×1 topic
- Earthquake9▲ 40×1 topic
- Seismic9▲ 40×1 topic
- Data Assimilation9▲ 13×1 topic
- Ensemble Kalman Filter9▲ 21×1 topic
- Primary Care9▲ 5.7×9 topics
- Health Information Management8▲ 154×2 topics
- Market Competition8▲ 41×2 topics
- Financial Analysis8▲ 16×1 topic
- Panel Data Models8▲ 58×1 topic
- Ethical Implications7▲ 34×2 topics
- Client7▲ 433×1 topic
- Patient7▲ 433×1 topic
- Hydraulic Fracturing6▲ 15×2 topics
- Policy6▲ 6.8×5 topics
- India6▲ 18×3 topics
- Fracture Propagation5▲ 21×1 topic
Which research topics does ING Direct publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization, Global Energy and Sustainability Research, Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures and Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization Civil and Structural Engineering 10 works
- 2 Global Energy and Sustainability Research Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 10 works
- 3 Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures Civil and Structural Engineering 9 works
- 4 Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods Ocean Engineering 9 works
- 5 Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Economics and Econometrics 8 works
- 6 Medical Research and Practices Medical Terminology 7 works
- 7 Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis Mechanical Engineering 5 works
- 8 Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 4 works
- 9 Primary Care and Health Outcomes General Health Professions 3 works
- 10 Oil and Gas Production Techniques Ocean Engineering 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has ING Direct's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 24% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is ING Direct as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0017% in 2024.
Fractional works of ING Direct over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 7.4% in 2000.
Other research institutions in New York
- Columbia University
- New York University
- City University of New York
- Mount Sinai Health System
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
- Human Growth Foundation
- Pfizer (United States)
- Rockefeller University
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about ING Direct. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
