Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation
- World rank, all time
- #37,343 of 42,892
- Rank in South Korea
- #534 of 596
- Research works
- 190 ▼ 48% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 2k 10.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 10.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 54% world 28%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 3.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 3.6×
- Social Sciences 3.5×
- Computer Science 3.4×
- Arts and Humanities 1.2×
- Mathematics 1.1×
- Health Professions 0.7×
- Decision Sciences 0.6×
- Neuroscience 0.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Environmental Science 0.3×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation?
Ranked on the composite score, Kyungsuk Chang, Eunkyoung Lee and Sungsook Kim lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- 1 Kyungsuk Chang South Korea · #1,013,976 worldwide 3 citations · 25 works
- 2 Eunkyoung Lee South Korea · #1,099,130 worldwide 22 citations · 26 works
- 3 Sungsook Kim South Korea · #1,255,967 worldwide 1 citations · 20 works
Which keywords describe research at Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Educational Technology, Teacher Professional Development, Self-Efficacy, E-Learning, Lifelong Learning, Online Education, Distance Education and RFID.
- Scientific Literacy
- Student Engagement
- Global Citizenship Education
- Teacher Education
- Digital Library System
- Diversity
- Adolescent Development
- Teacher Preparation
- Cultural Competence
- Safety Awareness
- Artificial Intelligence
- Physical Education
- Educational Research
- Pedagogical Content Knowledge
- Education
- Smart Learning
- RFID
- Online Education
- E-Learning
- Teacher Professional Development
- Educational Technology
- Self-Efficacy
- Lifelong Learning
- Distance Education
- Security
- Virtual Reality
- Globalization
- Teacher Knowledge
- Curriculum Development
- Social Justice
- STEM Education
- Traffic Accidents
- Semantic Network Analysis
- Career Development
- Cosmopolitanism
- Experiential Learning
- Smart Education
- Academic Achievement
- International Schools
- Inquiry-Based Teaching
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Educational Technology8▲ 16×9 topics
- Teacher Professional Development7▲ 107×3 topics
- Self-Efficacy4▲ 42×5 topics
- E-Learning4▲ 11×5 topics
- Lifelong Learning4▲ 54×4 topics
- Online Education4▲ 52×4 topics
- Distance Education4▲ 46×2 topics
- RFID4▲ 365×1 topic
- Security4▲ 14×1 topic
- Smart Learning3▲ 256×1 topic
- Virtual Reality3▲ 17×1 topic
- Education3▲ 4.9×11 topics
- Globalization3▲ 4.0×10 topics
- Pedagogical Content Knowledge3▲ 276×1 topic
- Teacher Knowledge3▲ 256×1 topic
- Educational Research2▲ 43×3 topics
- Curriculum Development2▲ 8.5×3 topics
- Physical Education2▲ 42×3 topics
- Social Justice2▲ 9.0×5 topics
- Artificial Intelligence2▲ 3.6×6 topics
- STEM Education2▲ 11×6 topics
- Safety Awareness2▲ 877×1 topic
- Traffic Accidents2▲ 101×1 topic
- Cultural Competence2▲ 35×3 topics
- Semantic Network Analysis2▲ 186×2 topics
- Teacher Preparation2▲ 62×2 topics
- Career Development2▲ 34×2 topics
- Adolescent Development1▲ 28×3 topics
- Cosmopolitanism1▲ 31×2 topics
- Diversity1▲ 19×2 topics
- Experiential Learning1▲ 66×3 topics
- Digital Library System1▲ 337×1 topic
- Smart Education1▲ 337×1 topic
- Teacher Education1▲ 25×2 topics
- Academic Achievement1▲ 17×3 topics
- Global Citizenship Education1▲ 57×1 topic
- International Schools1▲ 115×1 topic
- Student Engagement1▲ 7.3×5 topics
- Inquiry-Based Teaching1▲ 117×1 topic
- Scientific Literacy1▲ 117×1 topic
Which research topics does Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Educational Research and Pedagogy, Education and Learning Interventions, Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques and Education, Safety, and Science Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Educational Research and Pedagogy Computer Networks and Communications 4 works
- 2 Education and Learning Interventions Information Systems 3 works
- 3 Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques Education 3 works
- 4 Education, Safety, and Science Studies Safety Research 2 works
- 5 Educational Systems and Policies Information Systems 1 works
- 6 Global Education and Multiculturalism Education 1 works
- 7 Science Education and Pedagogy Education 1 works
- 8 EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Language and Linguistics 1 works
- 9 Diverse Educational Innovations Studies General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 works
- 10 Creativity in Education and Neuroscience Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 48% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Seoul
- Seoul National University
- Yonsei University
- Korea University
- Sungkyunkwan University
- Hanyang University
- Kyung Hee University
- Chung-Ang University
- Samsung (South Korea)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.