Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion

LFB (United States)

Research works
36
▼ 75% vs 2018-21
Citations
412
11.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
13.1%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
24%
world 40%
International
44%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: LFB (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does LFB (United States) work in?

In all years, 57% of research at LFB (United States) is in Health Sciences, 29% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (55%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (20%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (5%). It does 2.1× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 21 fractional works · 57.1% of its workMedicine: 20 fractional works · 55.0% of its workHematology: 9 fractional works · 24.8% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 2 fractional works · 6.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 2 fractional works · 4.9% of its workGenetics: 2 fractional works · 4.3% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 10 fractional works · 28.6% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 7 fractional works · 20.4% of its workGenetics: 5 fractional works · 13.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 5.7% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEndocrinology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 2 fractional works · 5.4% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSoil Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workForestry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workParasitology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 8.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 4.7% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workManagement Information Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 6.4% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSoftware: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKLFB (UnitedStates)36fractional works, all years
Life Sciences29%Physical Sciences6%Health Sciences57%Social Sciences8%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 15 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine2055.0%
    2. Veterinary01.4%
    3. Nursing00.5%
    4. Health Professions00.2%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology720.4%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences25.4%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology12.3%
    4. Neuroscience00.5%
    1. Social Sciences24.7%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting11.9%
    3. Arts and Humanities01.3%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.2%
    1. Engineering12.4%
    2. Environmental Science12.2%
    3. Computer Science11.8%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 2.35× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2.46× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 2.77× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Computer Science: 1.17× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.56× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 3.93× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 0.64× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.70× its world share, 1 worksMedicineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.78× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 3.9×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 9 fields, with their numbers
  1. Environmental Science3.93×1 works
  2. Immunology and Microbiology2.77×0 works
  3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology2.46×0 works
  4. Agricultural and Biological Sciences2.35×0 works
  5. Medicine1.70×1 works
  6. Computer Science1.17×0 works
  7. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.78×0 works
  8. Health Professions0.64×0 works
  9. Engineering0.56×0 works

Who are the top researchers at LFB (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Ian S. Mitchell, Stephen Blash and Daniel Bonzo lead among researchers whose main affiliation is LFB (United States).

  1. 1 Ian S. Mitchell United States · #3,032,442 worldwide 802 citations · 60 works
  2. 2 Stephen Blash United States · #3,863,626 worldwide 629 citations · 20 works
  3. 3 Daniel Bonzo United States · #4,473,113 worldwide 257 citations · 30 works
  4. 4 William G. Gavin United States · #5,229,051 worldwide 2.1k citations · 62 works
  5. 5 Michael Schofield United States · #5,536,161 worldwide 195 citations · 42 works
All ranked researchers at LFB (United States)

What are the most cited papers from LFB (United States)?

The most cited paper from LFB (United States) is "Clinical controversies in anticoagulation monitoring and antithrombin supplementation for ECMO" (Meghan Chlebowski, Sirine A. Baltagi, Mel Carlson et al., 2020), with 207 citations. Next come "Detailed von Willebrand factor multimer analysis in patients with von Willebrand disease in the European study, molecular and clinical markers for the diagnosis and management of type 1 von Willebrand disease (MCMDM‐1VWD)" (160) and "Type 2N von Willebrand disease: clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, laboratory diagnosis and molecular biology" (120).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Clinical controversies in anticoagulation monitoring and antithrombin supplementation for ECMO Meghan Chlebowski, Sirine A. Baltagi, Mel Carlson et al. · Critical Care Open access 20 Jan 2020 207
2 Detailed von Willebrand factor multimer analysis in patients with von Willebrand disease in the European study, molecular and clinical markers for the diagnosis and management of type 1 von Willebrand disease (MCMDM‐1VWD) Ulrich Budde et al. · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Open access Mar 2008 160
3 Type 2N von Willebrand disease: clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, laboratory diagnosis and molecular biology Claudine Mazurier, Jenny Goudemand, Lysiane Hilbert et al. · Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology Jun 2001 120
4 Linkage analysis in families diagnosed with type 1 von Willebrand disease in the European study, molecular and clinical markers for the diagnosis and management of type 1 VWD Jeroen C.J. Eikenboom et al. · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Open access 15 Mar 2006 119
5 Intravenous immunoglobulin for adults with autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura: results of a randomized trial comparing 0.5 and 1 g/kg b.w. Bertrand Godeau, Marie‐Thérèse Caulier, Laurent Decuypere et al. · British Journal of Haematology Dec 1999 105
All 82 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at LFB (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Biopharmaceutical Production, Hemostasis, Thrombosis, Genomic Integration, Genetic Modification, Transgenic Animals, Inflammation and Gene Therapy.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 32 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 32 words, with their numbers
  1. Inflammation4▲ 5.3×5 topics
  2. Biopharmaceutical Production4▲ 150×2 topics
  3. Hemostasis4▲ 78×2 topics
  4. Genomic Integration4▲ 108×2 topics
  5. Thrombosis4▲ 52×4 topics
  6. Genetic Modification4▲ 285×1 topic
  7. Transgenic Animals4▲ 285×1 topic
  8. Factor VIII3▲ 462×1 topic
  9. Gene Therapy3▲ 31×2 topics
  10. Hemophilia3▲ 462×1 topic
  11. Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura3▲ 208×1 topic
  12. Platelets3▲ 128×1 topic
  13. Epidemiology2▲ 1.59×13 topics
  14. Prenatal Diagnosis2▲ 33×2 topics
  15. Alloimmunization2▲ 115×1 topic
  16. Blood Groups2▲ 115×1 topic
  17. Immune Response2▲ 6.7×4 topics
  18. Pregnancy1▲ 17×2 topics
  19. Fertility Preservation1▲ 52×1 topic
  20. Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation1▲ 52×1 topic
  21. Protease-Activated Receptors1▲ 101×1 topic
  22. Thrombin1▲ 101×1 topic
  23. Genetic Mutations1▲ 6.5×3 topics
  24. Monoclonal Antibodies1▲ 24×3 topics
  25. Aneuploidy Screening1▲ 84×1 topic
  26. Diagnosis1▲ 3.1×4 topics
  27. Maternal Plasma DNA Sequencing1▲ 84×1 topic
  28. Therapeutic Antibodies1▲ 24×2 topics
  29. Biopharmaceuticals1▲ 42×3 topics
  30. Cerebral Development1▲ 124×1 topic
  31. Fetal MRI1▲ 124×1 topic
  32. Treatment1▲ 2.2×5 topics

Which research topics does LFB (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Computational Drug Discovery Methods, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Hemophilia Treatment and Research and Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism.

  1. 1 Computational Drug Discovery Methods Computational Theory and Mathematics 0 works
  2. 2 Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 0 works
  3. 3 Hemophilia Treatment and Research Hematology 0 works
  4. 4 Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism Cancer Research 0 works
  5. 5 Tree Root and Stability Studies Mechanical Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Fire effects on ecosystems Global and Planetary Change 0 works
  7. 7 Landslides and related hazards Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
  8. 8 African Botany and Ecology Studies Forestry 0 works
  9. 9 CAR-T cell therapy research Oncology 0 works
  10. 10 Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods Immunology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available23.9%not open76.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors43.9%domestic only56.1%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has LFB (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 75% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is LFB (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000016% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%LFB (United States)0.000012% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of LFB (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Framingham

All research institutions in Framingham

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about LFB (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.