Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Durham · United States

National Humanities Center

nationalhumanitiescenter.orgROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#38,122
of 42,892
Rank in United States
#8,017
of 8,685
Research works
124
▲ 58% vs 2013–17
Citations
1.5k
11.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
18.6%
record average 16.5%
Open access
20%
world 28%

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.57× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 1.44× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.54× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringPhysics and Astronomy: 1.07× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.82× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.24× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 9.28× its world share, 4 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.67× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.97× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 5.40× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.45× its world share, 5 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 9.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at National Humanities Center?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Nationalism, History, Colonialism, Identity, Globalization, Religion, Gender and Culture.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Nationalism13▲ 18×15 topics
  2. History12▲ 13×17 topics
  3. Globalization11▲ 4.8×17 topics
  4. Colonialism10▲ 16×15 topics
  5. Identity9▲ 9.5×19 topics
  6. Religion8▲ 11×11 topics
  7. Gender6▲ 9.2×11 topics
  8. Culture6▲ 10×11 topics
  9. Human Rights6▲ 5.7×16 topics
  10. Neoliberalism5▲ 12×6 topics
  11. Public Opinion5▲ 23×2 topics
  12. Philosophy5▲ 8.3×7 topics
  13. Federalism4▲ 34×2 topics
  14. American founding4▲ 49×1 topic
  15. Constitutional government4▲ 49×1 topic
  16. Politics4▲ 13×9 topics
  17. Democracy4▲ 8.9×8 topics
  18. Secularism4▲ 30×4 topics
  19. Ancient Rome4▲ 69×1 topic
  20. Feminism4▲ 11×6 topics
  21. Greek Literature4▲ 69×1 topic
  22. Literature4▲ 6.1×7 topics
  23. Cultural Critique4▲ 83×3 topics
  24. Meta-Analysis3▲ 4.7×3 topics
  25. Cultural Identity3▲ 5.5×6 topics
  26. Ethnography3▲ 18×4 topics
  27. Medicine3▲ 24×4 topics
  28. Slavery3▲ 83×2 topics
  29. Postcolonialism3▲ 19×6 topics
  30. Society3▲ 9.2×4 topics
  31. Atlantic History2▲ 101×1 topic
  32. Cultural Diversity2▲ 10×2 topics
  33. Transatlantic Slave Trade2▲ 101×1 topic
  34. 21st Century Skills2▲ 13×2 topics
  35. Governmentality2▲ 75×1 topic
  36. Imperialism2▲ 18×4 topics
  37. Structural Violence2▲ 106×1 topic
  38. Empire2▲ 20×5 topics
  39. Branding2▲ 114×1 topic
  40. Race2▲ 13×6 topics

Which research topics does National Humanities Center publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Indian and Buddhist Studies, Emotion and Mood Recognition, Urbanization and City Planning and Landscape and Cultural Studies.

Indian and Buddhist Stud…1Indian and Buddhist Studies: 1 fractional worksEmotion and Mood Recogni…1Emotion and Mood Recognition: 1 fractional worksUrbanization and City Planning: 0 fractional worksLandscape and Cultural Studies: 0 fractional worksArchitecture, Design, an…0Architecture, Design, and Social History: 0 fractional worksCanadian Identity and History: 0 fractional worksEastern European Communism and Reforms: 0 fractional worksDigital Humanities and S…0Digital Humanities and Scholarship: 0 fractional worksSociopolitical Dynamics in Russia: 0 fractional worksEducation and Character Development: 0 fractional works
Religious studiesExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyUrban StudiesArcheology4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Indian and Buddhist Studies Religious studies 1 works
  2. 2 Emotion and Mood Recognition Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1 works
  3. 3 Urbanization and City Planning Urban Studies 0 works
  4. 4 Landscape and Cultural Studies Archeology 0 works
  5. 5 Architecture, Design, and Social History Conservation 0 works
  6. 6 Canadian Identity and History Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  7. 7 Eastern European Communism and Reforms Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  8. 8 Digital Humanities and Scholarship Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
  9. 9 Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  10. 10 Education and Character Development Education 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available20.4%not open79.6%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors8.7%domestic only91.3%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has National Humanities Center's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 58% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Durham

All research institutions in Durham

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.