Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Archive · Tulsa · United States

Tulsa City-County Library

tulsalibrary.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
36
▲ 59% vs 2018-21
Citations
158
4.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
23%
world 40%
International
2%
world 18%
Tulsa City-County Library

Not ranked overall: Tulsa City-County Library is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Tulsa City-County Library work in?

In all years, 37% of research at Tulsa City-County Library is in Physical Sciences, 31% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (16%), Health Professions (16%), Engineering (16%).

Physical Sciences: 13 fractional works · 37.2% of its workEngineering: 6 fractional works · 16.0% of its workOcean Engineering: 4 fractional works · 9.8% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workComputer Science: 4 fractional works · 10.5% of its workInformation Systems: 2 fractional works · 4.8% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workComputer Science Applications: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 7.0% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGeology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workHealth Sciences: 11 fractional works · 30.9% of its workHealth Professions: 6 fractional works · 16.0% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 3 fractional works · 8.8% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMedicine: 5 fractional works · 14.9% of its workPhysiology: 2 fractional works · 4.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 9 fractional works · 25.9% of its workSocial Sciences: 6 fractional works · 16.3% of its workLibrary and Information Sciences: 3 fractional works · 8.4% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workHealth: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 3.8% of its workAccounting: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workMuseology: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 5.9% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 2 fractional works · 4.7% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEndocrinology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workDevelopmental Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKTulsa City-CountyLibrary36fractional works, all years
Life Sciences6%Physical Sciences37%Health Sciences31%Social Sciences26%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 12 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering616.0%
    2. Computer Science410.5%
    3. Environmental Science27.0%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences13.7%
    1. Health Professions616.0%
    2. Medicine514.9%
    1. Social Sciences616.3%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting13.8%
    3. Arts and Humanities13.7%
    4. Psychology12.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences24.7%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology01.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.38× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Computer Science: 2.33× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 1.21× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 3.01× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.02× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 8.24× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.94× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 0.74× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.40× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 8.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 9 fields, with their numbers
  1. Arts and Humanities8.24×1 works
  2. Health Professions3.01×0 works
  3. Computer Science2.33×1 works
  4. Engineering1.21×1 works
  5. Medicine1.02×1 works
  6. Business, Management and Accounting0.94×0 works
  7. Psychology0.74×0 works
  8. Social Sciences0.40×0 works
  9. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.38×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Tulsa City-County Library?

The most cited paper from Tulsa City-County Library is "Employee onboarding: identification of best practices in ACRL libraries" (Jolie Ogg Graybill, Maria Taesil Hudson Carpenter, Jerome Offord et al., 2013), with 74 citations. Next come "What Is Really Needed to Provide Effective, Person-Centered Care for Behavioral Expressions of Dementia? Guidance from The Alzheimer's Association Dementia Care Provider Roundtable" (42) and "Preventing Errors in Healthcare: A Call for Action" (36).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Employee onboarding: identification of best practices in ACRL libraries Jolie Ogg Graybill, Maria Taesil Hudson Carpenter, Jerome Offord et al. · Library Management 22 Feb 2013 74
2 What Is Really Needed to Provide Effective, Person-Centered Care for Behavioral Expressions of Dementia? Guidance from The Alzheimer's Association Dementia Care Provider Roundtable Sam Fazio, Sheryl Itkin Zimmerman, Patrick J. Doyle et al. · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Open access 25 Jul 2020 42
3 Preventing Errors in Healthcare: A Call for Action Al F. Al-Assaf, Lisa J. Bumpus, Dana Carter et al. · Hospital Topics 2003 36
4 Health literacy: an exploratory bibliometric analysis, 1997–2007 Heather L. Bankson · Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA Open access Apr 2009 33
5 Knowledge gained by mothers enrolled in a home visitation program. A Hammond-Ratzlaff, A. B. Fulton · PubMed 2001 30
All 50 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Tulsa City-County Library?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: CO2 Sequestration, Drilling Fluids, Well Integrity, Academic Libraries, Public Health, Consumer Behavior, Digital Divide and Ethical Considerations.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. CO2 Sequestration3▲ 67×2 topics
  2. Drilling Fluids3▲ 162×1 topic
  3. Well Integrity3▲ 162×1 topic
  4. Public Health3▲ 5.4×5 topics
  5. Machine Learning2▲ 3.2×5 topics
  6. Academic Libraries2▲ 143×2 topics
  7. Consumer Behavior2▲ 15×2 topics
  8. Digital Divide2▲ 28×2 topics
  9. Ethical Considerations2▲ 14×2 topics
  10. Digital Literacy2▲ 15×1 topic
  11. Information Literacy2▲ 35×1 topic
  12. Medical Education2▲ 18×3 topics
  13. Smoking Cessation2▲ 125×1 topic
  14. Social Media2▲ 5.3×2 topics
  15. Tobacco Use2▲ 125×1 topic
  16. Health Promotion1▲ 13×3 topics
  17. Library Services1▲ 249×1 topic
  18. Social Inclusion1▲ 115×1 topic
  19. Healthcare Workers1▲ 26×2 topics
  20. Mental Health1▲ 3.3×5 topics
  21. Depression1▲ 4.6×7 topics
  22. Health Effects1▲ 5.2×2 topics
  23. Healthcare1▲ 4.4×4 topics
  24. History1▲ 3.9×2 topics
  25. Narrative1▲ 22×2 topics
  26. Technology Integration1▲ 16×2 topics
  27. British Politics1▲ 134×1 topic
  28. Classification1▲ 7.8×1 topic
  29. Depoliticisation1▲ 134×1 topic
  30. Disaster Response1▲ 36×1 topic
  31. Financial Literacy1▲ 61×1 topic
  32. Food Safety1▲ 10×1 topic
  33. Hydraulic Fracturing1▲ 24×2 topics
  34. Hygiene Practices1▲ 141×1 topic
  35. Internet Traffic1▲ 104×1 topic
  36. Literature1▲ 5.7×1 topic
  37. Museum1▲ 307×1 topic
  38. Particulate Matter1▲ 25×2 topics
  39. Retirement Planning1▲ 101×1 topic
  40. Triage1▲ 72×1 topic

Which research topics does Tulsa City-County Library publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Libraries and Information Services, Open Education and E-Learning, Mobile Learning in Education and Concrete and Cement Materials Research.

Libraries and Informatio…1Libraries and Information Services: 1 fractional worksOpen Education and E-Learning: 0 fractional worksMobile Learning in Education: 0 fractional worksConcrete and Cement Mate…0Concrete and Cement Materials Research: 0 fractional worksE-Learning and Knowledge Management: 0 fractional worksConcrete Properties and Behavior: 0 fractional worksFire effects on concrete…0Fire effects on concrete materials: 0 fractional worksGender Diversity and Inequality: 0 fractional worksReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices: 0 fractional worksJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior: 0 fractional works
MuseologyComputer Science ApplicationsInformation SystemsCivil and Structural Engineering3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Libraries and Information Services Museology 1 works
  2. 2 Open Education and E-Learning Computer Science Applications 0 works
  3. 3 Mobile Learning in Education Information Systems 0 works
  4. 4 Concrete and Cement Materials Research Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works
  5. 5 E-Learning and Knowledge Management Computer Science Applications 0 works
  6. 6 Concrete Properties and Behavior Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works
  7. 7 Fire effects on concrete materials Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works
  8. 8 Gender Diversity and Inequality Gender Studies 0 works
  9. 9 Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices Philosophy 0 works
  10. 10 Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available23.4%not open76.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors2.0%domestic only98.0%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Tulsa City-County Library's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 59% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Tulsa City-County Library as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000023% in 2024.

still counting0.00025%0.00050%0.00075%Tulsa City-County Library0.000046% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Tulsa City-County Library over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Tulsa

All research institutions in Tulsa

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Tulsa City-County Library. Posts are plain text and can be reported.