Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Epidemiology

Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis

Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis is a research topic within Epidemiology. Science Explorer counts 17k research works in it since 1950. 12.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers the epidemiology, classification, and clinical features of inflammatory myopathies such as dermatomyositis and polymyositis. It includes discussions on autoantibodies, interstitial lung disease, cancer risk, treatment strategies, myositis-specific antibodies, juvenile dermatomyositis, and the association with malignancy.

  • Inflammatory Myopathies
  • Dermatomyositis
  • Polymyositis
  • Autoantibodies
  • Interstitial Lung Disease
  • Cancer Risk
  • Treatment
  • Myositis-specific Antibodies
  • Juvenile Dermatomyositis
  • Malignancy
Research works
17k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.1k
per year above
Top-10% rate
12.3%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+44%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (786 and 419 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 786 works
  2. 2 China 419 works
  3. 3 Japan 299 works
  4. 4 United Kingdom 207 works
  5. 5 India 192 works
  6. 6 France 168 works
  7. 7 Italy 164 works
  8. 8 Germany 130 works
  9. 9 Spain 121 works
  10. 10 Brazil 100 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 30.4%China: 16.2%Japan: 11.6%United Kingdom: 8.0%6 others listed: 33.8%30%largest
United States786 · 30.4%China419 · 16.2%Japan299 · 11.6%United Kingdom207 · 8.0%6 others listed875 · 33.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Johns Hopkins University publishes the most Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis research, followed by China-Japan Friendship Hospital and Johns Hopkins Medicine.

Who are the leading researchers in Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis include William J. McKenna.

  1. 1 William J. McKenna United Kingdom 2.3k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis research done?

The largest centres of Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Tokyo (Japan), Paris (France) and London (United Kingdom). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Tunis.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 84 works
  2. 2 Tokyo Japan 81 works
  3. 3 Paris France 68 works
  4. 4 London United Kingdom 61 works
  5. 5 Baltimore United States 43 works
  6. 6 Philadelphia United States 41 works
  7. 7 Shanghai China 41 works
  8. 8 São Paulo Brazil 39 works
  9. 9 New York United States 34 works
  10. 10 Seoul South Korea 34 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. TunisTN · 22.0 works9.3×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis than the world average.

See Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis on the map

Where is the best place to study Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis?

Among universities, judged by research, Johns Hopkins University, University of Pennsylvania and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 20.69%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Johns Hopkins University: 21, 23.0%University of Pennsylvania: 14, 13.6%Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College: 15, 19.9%University of Padua: 13, 22.2%University of Michigan: 9, 30.4%University College London: 13, 17.7%Peking University: 11, 17.0%University of Pittsburgh: 12, 18.2%Karolinska Institutet: 8, 18.2%The University of Tokyo: 9, 26.7%Johns Hopkins Univer…University of PaduaChinese Academy of M…University of Pennsy…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 62.523.0%5.6×21 +35.8%
2 University of PennsylvaniaUnited States 52.213.6%4.4×14 +275.0%
3 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 47.919.9%4.3×15 +54.3%
4 University of PaduaItaly 47.622.2%4.8×13 -11.3%
5 University of MichiganUnited States 46.330.4%1.9×9 +120.1%
6 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 45.817.7%2.8×13 +65.9%
7 Peking UniversityChina 44.717.0%2.0×11 +238.3%
8 University of PittsburghUnited States 43.718.2%4.7×12 +37.4%
9 Karolinska InstitutetSweden 41.218.2%5.3×8 +3.1%
10 The University of TokyoJapan 35.926.7%2.1×9 +2.6%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 44% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.