Operations Management Techniques
Operations Management Techniques is a research topic within Management Science and Operations Research. Science Explorer counts 9.7k research works in it since 1950. 10.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers revolves around the Theory of Constraints (TOC) and its application in operations management, supply chain collaboration, product mix optimization, constraint management, and performance measurement. The papers also explore the integration of TOC with other methodologies such as Six Sigma and Lean, as well as its impact on decision-making and organizational performance.
- Theory of Constraints
- Operations Management
- Supply Chain
- Product Mix
- Constraint Management
- Performance Measures
- TOC Thinking Processes
- Bottleneck Operation
- Throughput Accounting
- Change Management
- Research works
- 9.7k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 978 per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 10.1% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- -10% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
Indonesia
37% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Which countries lead Operations Management Techniques research?
By volume, Indonesia and Brazil publish the most (384 and 155 works in 2022-now).
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Indonesia 384 works
- 2
Brazil 155 works
- 3
United States 130 works
- 4
India 85 works
- 5
Peru 58 works
- 6
Türkiye 57 works
- 7
Russia 54 works
- 8
China 52 works
- 9
Poland 36 works
- 10
United Kingdom 35 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Operations Management Techniques research?
By volume in 2022-now, Universidad de Lima publishes the most Operations Management Techniques research, followed by University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur and Peruvian University of Applied Sciences.
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Universidad de Lima
Peru 25 works
- 2
University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
Indonesia 20 works
- 3
Peruvian University of Applied Sciences
Peru 16 works
- 4
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Indonesia 12 works
- 5
Bandung Institute of Technology
Indonesia 11 works
- 6
Tarumanagara University
Indonesia 11 works
- 7
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
Brazil 10 works
- 8
University of Singaperbangsa Karawang
Indonesia 9 works
- 9
Bandung Islamic University
Indonesia 9 works
- 10
Universidade Federal Fluminense
Brazil 9 works
Who are the leading researchers in Operations Management Techniques?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Operations Management Techniques include Thomas L. Saaty.
- 1
Thomas L. Saaty
United States 122k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Operations Management Techniques research done?
The largest centres of Operations Management Techniques research in 2022-now are Jakarta (Indonesia), Surabaya (Indonesia), Bandung (Indonesia) and Lima (Peru). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Lima.
Largest cities, 2022-now
Where it is the local speciality
- LimaPE · 45.9 works21×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Operations Management Techniques than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Operations Management Techniques?
Among universities, judged by research, Universidad de Lima, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos and Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Universidad de Lima |
91.4 | 11.3% | 261.2× | 25 | - |
| 2 | Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos |
72.5 | 9.6% | 59.6× | 10 | +41.8% |
| 3 | Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta |
61.7 | 12.2% | 31.2× | 8 | +595.2% |
| 4 | Peruvian University of Applied Sciences |
58.1 | 6.1% | 127.1× | 16 | -20.3% |
| 5 | Universidade Federal Fluminense |
57.2 | 11.7% | 13.2× | 9 | +2.5% |
| 6 | Weatherford College |
52.0 | 9.4% | 4.5× | 9 | +249.0% |
| 7 | University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur |
44.4 | 1.0% | 20.8× | 20 | +433.9% |
| 8 | Bandung Institute of Technology |
38.2 | 1.3% | 11.8× | 11 | +304.7% |
| 9 | Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya |
35.8 | 2.9% | 28.9× | 12 | +458.3% |
| 10 | University of Singaperbangsa Karawang |
35.2 | 4.3% | 16.2× | 9 | +390.9% |
| 11 | Tarumanagara University |
32.0 | 2.4% | 14.6× | 11 | +151.9% |
| 12 | Bandung Islamic University |
21.3 | 3.8% | 14.5× | 9 | -24.7% |
Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.
Every institution in Operations Management Techniques, country by countryIs Operations Management Techniques research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 10% lower than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2019.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Operations Management Techniques as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0075% in 2024.
Fractional works of Operations Management Techniques over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Operations Management Techniques. Posts are plain text and can be reported.