Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services

Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services is a research topic within Information Systems. Science Explorer counts 66k research works in it since 1953. 21.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on Quality of Service (QoS)-aware middleware for Web services composition, semantic matching of Web services, and service-oriented computing. It covers topics such as automated web service discovery, dynamic service composition, and service selection algorithms, with an emphasis on QoS and semantic web services.

  • QoS-Aware Middleware
  • Semantic Web Services
  • Service-Oriented Computing
  • Web Service Composition
  • Quality of Service (QoS)
  • Semantic Matching
  • Service Selection Algorithms
  • Dynamic Service Composition
  • Automated Web Service Discovery
  • Service-Oriented Architecture
Research works
66k
fractional, since 1953
In the world top 10%
14k
per year above
Top-10% rate
21.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-50%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (627 and 356 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 627 works
  2. 2 United States 356 works
  3. 3 Germany 343 works
  4. 4 India 268 works
  5. 5 Italy 132 works
  6. 6 France 123 works
  7. 7 Indonesia 104 works
  8. 8 United Kingdom 87 works
  9. 9 Spain 86 works
  10. 10 Brazil 84 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 28.4%United States: 16.1%Germany: 15.5%India: 12.1%6 others listed: 27.8%28%largest
China627 · 28.4%United States356 · 16.1%Germany343 · 15.5%India268 · 12.1%6 others listed615 · 27.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services research?

By volume in 2022–2025, RWTH Aachen University publishes the most Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services research, followed by National University of Defense Technology and Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications.

Who are the leading researchers in Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services include Wei Liu, Rajkumar Buyya and Wil M. P. van der Aalst.

  1. 1 Wei Liu Australia 9.7k citations
  2. 2 Rajkumar Buyya Australia 7.8k citations
  3. 3 Wil M. P. van der Aalst Netherlands 5.5k citations
  4. 4 Ian Foster United States 4.9k citations
  5. 5 David Culler United States 4.4k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services research done?

The largest centres of Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Nanjing (China) and Aachen (Germany). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Aachen.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 163 works
  2. 2 Shanghai China 43 works
  3. 3 Nanjing China 36 works
  4. 4 Aachen Germany 36 works
  5. 5 Changsha China 34 works
  6. 6 Wuhan China 30 works
  7. 7 Hangzhou China 30 works
  8. 8 Munich Germany 28 works
  9. 9 Paris France 28 works
  10. 10 Chennai India 27 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. AachenDE · 36.1 works12×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services than the world average.

See Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services on the map

Where is the best place to study Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services?

Among universities, judged by research, RWTH Aachen University, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano and Eindhoven University of Technology score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%60%mean 25.61%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →RWTH Aachen University: 35, 48.6%Free University of Bozen-Bolzano: 10, 47.9%Eindhoven University of Technology: 11, 40.6%University of Stuttgart: 13, 27.2%TU Wien: 11, 15.2%Technical University of Munich: 13, 31.0%Hunan University of Science and Technology: 10, 24.8%University of Sfax: 10, 1.6%Technische Universität Dresden: 12, 17.2%Mohammed V University: 12, 2.0%RWTH Aachen UniversityFree University of B…Eindhoven University…University of Stuttg…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany 84.648.6%14.4×35 +16.3%
2 Free University of Bozen-BolzanoItaly 71.847.9%29.7×10 +42.8%
3 Eindhoven University of TechnologyNetherlands 63.040.6%9.3×11 -35.0%
4 University of StuttgartGermany 51.827.2%10.8×13 -47.0%
5 TU WienAustria 47.615.2%10.7×11 -64.2%
6 Technical University of MunichGermany 46.031.0%4.9×13 -33.5%
7 Hunan University of Science and TechnologyChina 45.824.8%19.6×10 -34.6%
8 University of SfaxTunisia 43.81.6%12.3×10 +46.5%
9 Technische Universität DresdenGermany 41.517.2%7.8×12 -40.4%
10 Mohammed V UniversityMorocco 40.72.0%9.3×12 +79.7%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 50% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2010.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.