Australia vs Monaco
On research quality in 2022-now, Australia ranks #7 in the world and Monaco #143, of 189 countries. Australia stands higher in 26 of the 26 fields both publish in, Monaco in 0.
Research profiles alike: 0.63similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Australia
- World rank, 2022-now
- #7
- #8 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 343k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 15.0%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 40%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Research and Theory, Public Administration, Medical Terminology.
Monaco
- World rank, 2022-now
- #143
- #107 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 326
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 14.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 35%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Oceanography, Marketing, Biotechnology.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Australia leads on 6 of 9 measures: research quality, excellence for its fields, output, institutions in the world top 100, open access and growth. Monaco leads on 1 of 9 measures: international co-authorship. The two are level on top-10% rate and citations per work.
- #7Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#143
- 1.29×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.11×
- 343kOutputfractional works, 2022-now326
- 15.0%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited14.6%
- 28.5Citations per workall time, per fractional work27.8
- 5World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 40%Open accessof its works free to read, all time35%
- 26%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time52%
- -3%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change-4%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Australia stands higher in 26 of 26 fields, Monaco in 0. Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #6Agricultural and Biological Sciences-
- #9Arts and Humanities-
- #8Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-
- #8Business, Management and Accounting-
- #5Chemical Engineering-
- #12Chemistry-
- #6Computer Science-
- #7Decision Sciences-
- #8Dentistry-
- #6Earth and Planetary Sciences-
- #8Economics, Econometrics and Finance-
- #6Energy-
- #5Engineering-
- #4Environmental Science-
- #5Health Professions-
- #7Immunology and Microbiology-
- #6Materials Science-
- #12Mathematics-
- #9Medicine-
- #9Neuroscience-
- #7Nursing-
- #9Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-
- #12Physics and Astronomy-
- #5Psychology-
- #7Social Sciences-
- #6Veterinary-
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Australia rank | Monaco rank | Australia top 10% | Monaco top 10% | Australia works | Monaco works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #6 | - | 15.4% | - | 12k | - |
| Arts and Humanities | #9 | - | 14.3% | - | 9.7k | - |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #8 | - | 13.0% | - | 16k | - |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #8 | - | 16.3% | - | 9.8k | - |
| Chemical Engineering | #5 | - | 15.5% | - | 779 | - |
| Chemistry | #12 | - | 12.8% | - | 2.8k | - |
| Computer Science | #6 | - | 16.7% | - | 20k | - |
| Decision Sciences | #7 | - | 15.0% | - | 3.7k | - |
| Dentistry | #8 | - | 18.7% | - | 1.1k | - |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #6 | - | 14.0% | - | 6.3k | - |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #8 | - | 12.4% | - | 8.1k | - |
| Energy | #6 | - | 17.0% | - | 2.7k | - |
| Engineering | #5 | - | 16.2% | - | 37k | - |
| Environmental Science | #4 | - | 14.3% | - | 21k | - |
| Health Professions | #5 | - | 15.4% | - | 16k | - |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #7 | - | 13.3% | - | 3.6k | - |
| Materials Science | #6 | - | 15.8% | - | 6.8k | - |
| Mathematics | #12 | - | 13.5% | - | 2.5k | - |
| Medicine | #9 | - | 14.0% | - | 80k | - |
| Neuroscience | #9 | - | 12.8% | - | 7.1k | - |
| Nursing | #7 | - | 15.7% | - | 1.9k | - |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #9 | - | 14.2% | - | 814 | - |
| Physics and Astronomy | #12 | - | 12.5% | - | 5.8k | - |
| Psychology | #5 | - | 16.5% | - | 18k | - |
| Social Sciences | #7 | - | 16.0% | - | 47k | - |
| Veterinary | #6 | - | 14.8% | - | 738 | - |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Australia
- Decolonization
- Population Dynamics
- Health Equity
- Adolescents
- Primary Care
- Physical Activity
- Anxiety
- Prevalence
- Social Support
- Biodiversity
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Social Media
- Oxidative Stress
- Depression
- Environmental Impact
- Quality of Life
- Public Health
- Sustainability
- Deep Learning
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Machine Learning
- Mental Health
- Globalization
- Inflammation
- Risk Factors
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Treatment
- Healthcare
- Resilience
- Genetics
- Identity
- Mortality
- Global Burden
- Aging
- Ethics
- Ethical Considerations
- Neoliberalism
- Vulnerability
- Health Disparities
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology21k▲ 1.37×140 topics
- Climate Change15k▲ 1.45×132 topics
- Machine Learning11k▼ 0.86×97 topics
- Deep Learning11k▼ 0.79×85 topics
- Mental Health9,669▲ 1.74×48 topics
- Sustainability9,393◆ 0.99×140 topics
- Globalization9,017▲ 1.18×185 topics
- Public Health8,739▲ 1.54×77 topics
- Inflammation8,511◆ 1.03×83 topics
- Quality of Life8,357▲ 1.49×61 topics
- Risk Factors6,421▲ 1.50×37 topics
- Environmental Impact6,048◆ 0.91×74 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease5,888▲ 1.33×39 topics
- Depression5,660▲ 1.65×26 topics
- Treatment5,636▲ 1.19×52 topics
- Oxidative Stress5,147▼ 0.80×63 topics
- Healthcare5,064◆ 1.14×44 topics
- Social Media4,900◆ 0.91×41 topics
- Resilience4,114▲ 2.1×19 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome4,006▲ 1.27×24 topics
- Genetics3,863▲ 1.40×27 topics
- Biodiversity3,847▲ 1.30×38 topics
- Identity3,769▲ 1.34×79 topics
- Social Support3,667▲ 1.75×20 topics
- Mortality3,644▲ 1.65×13 topics
- Prevalence3,622▲ 2.3×15 topics
- Global Burden3,532▲ 1.66×12 topics
- Anxiety3,449▲ 1.86×12 topics
- Aging3,396▲ 1.60×19 topics
- Physical Activity3,364▲ 1.78×13 topics
- Ethics3,337▲ 1.69×62 topics
- Primary Care3,139▲ 2.2×15 topics
- Ethical Considerations3,109▲ 2.3×21 topics
- Adolescents3,045▲ 2.1×11 topics
- Neoliberalism2,940▲ 2.1×30 topics
- Health Equity2,880▲ 2.5×6 topics
- Vulnerability2,625▲ 2.9×9 topics
- Population Dynamics2,566▲ 2.6×13 topics
- Health Disparities2,466▲ 2.4×9 topics
- Decolonization1,706▲ 5.4×8 topics
Monaco
- Stakeholder Engagement
- Seagrasses
- Marine Natural Products
- Bioprospecting
- Impulse Buying
- Climate Change Impacts
- Marine Organisms
- Human Health
- Aquaculture
- CO2 Emissions
- Benthic Communities
- Ecosystem Services
- Brand Trust
- Marine Environment
- Customer Experience
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Behavior
- Coral Reefs
- Marine Ecosystems
- Ocean Acidification
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Bleaching
- Sustainability
- Environmental Impact
- Oxidative Stress
- Coastal Protection
- Brand Equity
- Health Effects
- Social Capital
- Marine Biodiversity
- Environmental Impacts
- Global Change
- Calcifying Organisms
- Metagenomics
- Ecosystem Resilience
- Multichannel Retailing
- Kelp Forests
- Microbial Symbionts
- Sponge-Associated Microorganisms
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change32▲ 3.1×48 topics
- Ocean Acidification24▲ 84×3 topics
- Epidemiology17◆ 1.11×77 topics
- Marine Ecosystems15▲ 72×2 topics
- Bleaching15▲ 118×1 topic
- Coral Reefs15▲ 118×1 topic
- Sustainability13▲ 1.36×38 topics
- Consumer Behavior12▲ 4.9×11 topics
- Environmental Impact12▲ 1.78×23 topics
- Corporate Governance10▲ 3.7×10 topics
- Oxidative Stress10▲ 1.64×26 topics
- Customer Experience8▲ 12×3 topics
- Coastal Protection8▲ 29×2 topics
- Marine Environment7▲ 13×3 topics
- Brand Equity7▲ 28×1 topic
- Brand Trust7▲ 35×1 topic
- Health Effects7▲ 3.0×15 topics
- Ecosystem Services7▲ 4.6×6 topics
- Social Capital6▲ 3.3×9 topics
- Benthic Communities6▲ 25×2 topics
- Marine Biodiversity6▲ 25×2 topics
- CO2 Emissions6▲ 8.3×3 topics
- Environmental Impacts5▲ 5.1×6 topics
- Aquaculture5▲ 5.2×4 topics
- Global Change5▲ 5.0×3 topics
- Human Health5▲ 8.1×2 topics
- Calcifying Organisms5▲ 107×1 topic
- Marine Organisms5▲ 107×1 topic
- Metagenomics5▲ 14×3 topics
- Climate Change Impacts5▲ 10×4 topics
- Ecosystem Resilience5▲ 8.0×4 topics
- Impulse Buying5▲ 23×1 topic
- Multichannel Retailing5▲ 23×1 topic
- Bioprospecting5▲ 43×2 topics
- Kelp Forests4▲ 38×1 topic
- Marine Natural Products4▲ 26×2 topics
- Microbial Symbionts4▲ 78×1 topic
- Seagrasses4▲ 38×1 topic
- Sponge-Associated Microorganisms4▲ 78×1 topic
- Stakeholder Engagement4▲ 11×3 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Australia has out-published Monaco every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 3In the world top 500
- 5In the top 1000
- 19In the top 5000
- 35In the top 1,0000
- #6Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Australia or Monaco?
Australia publishes 1053.4× as much research as Monaco in 2022-now (343k against 326 fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Australia or Monaco?
15.0% of Australia's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 14.6% for Monaco.
Is Australia or Monaco growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was -3% against 2018-21 for Australia, and -4% for Monaco.
Which has more open access research, Australia or Monaco?
40% of Australia's research is free to read, against 35% of Monaco's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Australia or Monaco?
Australia holds 5 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Monaco 0; in the top 1,000 it is 35 against 0.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Australia
- 1The University of Melbourne14.9% top 10% · 23k works
- 2UNSW Sydney15.7% top 10% · 19k works
- 3Monash University16.1% top 10% · 20k works
- 4The University of Queensland15.0% top 10% · 20k works
- 5The University of Sydney14.4% top 10% · 25k works
- 6Australian National University13.7% top 10% · 11k works
Monaco
- 1International University of Monaco14.1% top 10% · 173 works
- 2Scientific Centre of Monaco19.1% top 10% · 91 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Australia
- 1 Seyedali Mirjalili #9 worldwide 154k citations · 823 works
- 2 Weng Marc Lim #78 worldwide 42k citations · 417 works
- 3 Shulei Chou #90 worldwide 63k citations · 657 works
- 4 Shi‐Zhang Qiao #130 worldwide 159k citations · 811 works
- 5 X. J. Zhu #134 worldwide 95k citations · 301 works
Monaco
- 1 Christine Ferrier‐Pagès #76,466 worldwide 16k citations · 332 works
- 2 Denis Allemand #77,538 worldwide 19k citations · 318 works
- 3 Éric Tambutté #79,835 worldwide 8.7k citations · 169 works
- 4 Didier Zoccola #169,874 worldwide 6.7k citations · 175 works
- 5 Sylvie Tambutté #172,332 worldwide 8.5k citations · 155 works
Other comparisons
Australiavs
United Kingdom
Australiavs
France
Australiavs
Switzerland
Australiavs
Canada
Australiavs
Netherlands
Australiavs
Spain