Austria vs Japan
On research quality in 2022-now, Japan ranks #16 in the world and Austria #17, of 189 countries. Austria stands higher in 10 of the 26 fields both publish in, Japan in 16.
Research profiles alike: -0.12different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Austria
- World rank, 2022-now
- #17
- #16 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 90k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 10.7%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 37%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Classics, Software, History and Philosophy of Science.
Japan
- World rank, 2022-now
- #16
- #17 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 558k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 6.0%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 42%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Condensed Matter Physics, Structural Biology, Gastroenterology.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Austria leads on 5 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, international co-authorship and growth. Japan leads on 4 of 9 measures: research quality, output, institutions in the world top 100 and open access.
- #17Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#16
- 1.20×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.64×
- 90kOutputfractional works, 2022-now558k
- 10.7%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited6.0%
- 22.2Citations per workall time, per fractional work17.2
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1001
- 37%Open accessof its works free to read, all time42%
- 29%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time12%
- +4%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change-5%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Austria stands higher in 10 of 26 fields, Japan in 16. Japan leads most in Chemical Engineering (#13 against #21); Austria leads most in Business, Management and Accounting (#14 against #26). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #18Agricultural and Biological Sciences#16
- #11Arts and Humanities#22
- #17Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#13
- #14Business, Management and Accounting#26
- #21Chemical Engineering#13
- #22Chemistry#14
- #15Computer Science#16
- #21Decision Sciences#25
- #17Dentistry#12
- #19Earth and Planetary Sciences#15
- #13Economics, Econometrics and Finance#17
- #27Energy#21
- #20Engineering#16
- #19Environmental Science#20
- #17Health Professions#22
- #18Immunology and Microbiology#15
- #21Materials Science#12
- #16Mathematics#14
- #17Medicine#18
- #18Neuroscience#16
- #19Nursing#18
- #21Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics#13
- #14Physics and Astronomy#10
- #17Psychology#23
- #13Social Sciences#26
- -Veterinary#17
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Austria rank | Japan rank | Austria top 10% | Japan top 10% | Austria works | Japan works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #18 | #16 | 12.9% | 6.4% | 2.4k | 16k |
| Arts and Humanities | #11 | #22 | 11.6% | 9.5% | 4.9k | 5.2k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #17 | #13 | 11.0% | 5.5% | 5.1k | 41k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #14 | #26 | 11.1% | 6.2% | 3.2k | 5.2k |
| Chemical Engineering | #21 | #13 | 6.5% | 4.8% | 281 | 2.5k |
| Chemistry | #22 | #14 | 8.7% | 4.8% | 1.2k | 12k |
| Computer Science | #15 | #16 | 9.7% | 5.1% | 7.1k | 37k |
| Decision Sciences | #21 | #25 | 11.8% | 5.7% | 924 | 2.9k |
| Dentistry | #17 | #12 | 15.0% | 7.7% | 256 | 2.9k |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #19 | #15 | 10.6% | 6.7% | 1.4k | 8.7k |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #13 | #17 | 12.2% | 7.4% | 1.8k | 6.1k |
| Energy | #27 | #21 | 9.0% | 6.9% | 535 | 3.6k |
| Engineering | #20 | #16 | 7.8% | 4.6% | 13k | 94k |
| Environmental Science | #19 | #20 | 11.6% | 6.0% | 3.9k | 21k |
| Health Professions | #17 | #22 | 9.7% | 6.9% | 2k | 8.9k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #18 | #15 | 11.7% | 6.3% | 888 | 7k |
| Materials Science | #21 | #12 | 7.9% | 4.9% | 2.3k | 27k |
| Mathematics | #16 | #14 | 11.6% | 6.3% | 1.5k | 6.9k |
| Medicine | #17 | #18 | 12.2% | 6.6% | 17k | 167k |
| Neuroscience | #18 | #16 | 10.1% | 5.2% | 1.7k | 14k |
| Nursing | #19 | #18 | 11.7% | 5.6% | 231 | 2.8k |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #21 | #13 | 9.3% | 6.5% | 205 | 2.6k |
| Physics and Astronomy | #14 | #10 | 11.7% | 7.4% | 2.6k | 22k |
| Psychology | #17 | #23 | 11.5% | 6.2% | 3.3k | 14k |
| Social Sciences | #13 | #26 | 11.3% | 7.1% | 12k | 27k |
| Veterinary | - | #17 | - | 5.0% | - | 773 |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Austria
- Digital Governance
- Regulatory Agencies
- Migration Law
- Ethnografisches Schreiben
- European Union
- Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse
- Religion
- Nationalism
- Ethics
- History
- Treatment
- Oxidative Stress
- Quality of Life
- Identity
- Human Rights
- Renewable Energy
- Sustainable Development
- Inflammation
- Deep Learning
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Machine Learning
- Sustainability
- Globalization
- Big Data
- Education
- Public Health
- Artificial Intelligence
- Environmental Impact
- Gender
- Mechanical Properties
- Innovation
- Governance
- Literature
- Philosophy
- Neoliberalism
- Bildungsungleichheit
- Bildung
- Legal Methodology
- Constitutional Courts
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology3,551▼ 0.86×140 topics
- Climate Change3,088◆ 1.10×131 topics
- Machine Learning2,846▼ 0.83×93 topics
- Deep Learning2,629▼ 0.74×82 topics
- Sustainability2,573◆ 1.02×139 topics
- Inflammation2,161◆ 0.98×83 topics
- Globalization1,998◆ 0.98×178 topics
- Sustainable Development1,541◆ 0.95×109 topics
- Big Data1,464▲ 1.48×36 topics
- Renewable Energy1,433◆ 0.96×61 topics
- Education1,415▼ 0.80×153 topics
- Human Rights1,400▲ 1.33×90 topics
- Public Health1,387◆ 0.92×76 topics
- Identity1,384▲ 1.85×78 topics
- Artificial Intelligence1,380◆ 0.94×65 topics
- Quality of Life1,375◆ 0.92×61 topics
- Environmental Impact1,319▼ 0.75×71 topics
- Oxidative Stress1,319▼ 0.78×63 topics
- Gender1,204▲ 2.2×58 topics
- Treatment1,159◆ 0.92×52 topics
- Mechanical Properties1,144◆ 1.13×39 topics
- History1,105▲ 1.54×66 topics
- Innovation1,067◆ 1.00×88 topics
- Ethics1,063▲ 2.0×60 topics
- Governance1,020▲ 3.0×20 topics
- Nationalism836▲ 1.80×33 topics
- Literature831▲ 1.47×64 topics
- Religion802▲ 1.68×43 topics
- Philosophy800▲ 1.75×47 topics
- Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse749▲ 19×2 topics
- Neoliberalism696▲ 1.87×30 topics
- European Union620▲ 2.7×29 topics
- Bildungsungleichheit529▲ 19×1 topic
- Ethnografisches Schreiben529▲ 19×1 topic
- Bildung381▲ 12×3 topics
- Migration Law341▲ 23×2 topics
- Legal Methodology335▲ 18×2 topics
- Regulatory Agencies330▲ 15×2 topics
- Constitutional Courts328▲ 21×2 topics
- Digital Governance317▲ 28×1 topic
Japan
- Adjuvant Therapy
- Molecular Characterization
- Echocardiography
- Surgery
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Heart Failure
- Aging
- Clinical Trials
- Tumor Microenvironment
- Surgical Management
- Mechanical Properties
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Neural Networks
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Nanoparticles
- Cancer
- Chemotherapy
- Oxidative Stress
- Machine Learning
- Inflammation
- Epidemiology
- Deep Learning
- Treatment
- Climate Change
- Quality of Life
- Diagnosis
- Biomedical Applications
- Immunotherapy
- Risk Factors
- Management
- Prognostic Factors
- Neurological Disorders
- Genetic Mutations
- Guidelines
- Complications
- Radiotherapy
- Prognosis
- Survival Analysis
- Modernization
- Endoscopic Resection
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology32k▲ 1.28×140 topics
- Inflammation21k▲ 1.54×83 topics
- Deep Learning18k▼ 0.85×85 topics
- Machine Learning14k▼ 0.67×97 topics
- Treatment12k▲ 1.59×52 topics
- Oxidative Stress12k◆ 1.15×63 topics
- Climate Change12k▼ 0.69×132 topics
- Chemotherapy11k▲ 2.6×25 topics
- Quality of Life11k▲ 1.17×61 topics
- Cancer11k▲ 1.24×59 topics
- Diagnosis10k▲ 1.78×41 topics
- Nanoparticles9,087◆ 1.14×44 topics
- Biomedical Applications8,930▲ 1.20×36 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease8,839▲ 1.23×39 topics
- Immunotherapy8,823▲ 1.94×19 topics
- Neural Networks8,643◆ 0.89×42 topics
- Risk Factors8,023▲ 1.16×37 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines7,936▲ 2.3×14 topics
- Management7,655▲ 1.52×40 topics
- Mechanical Properties6,915◆ 1.12×39 topics
- Prognostic Factors6,756▲ 2.5×14 topics
- Surgical Management6,288▲ 2.4×20 topics
- Neurological Disorders5,916▲ 1.64×20 topics
- Tumor Microenvironment5,642▲ 1.98×8 topics
- Genetic Mutations5,620▲ 2.0×23 topics
- Clinical Trials5,573▲ 1.32×19 topics
- Guidelines5,493▲ 1.84×13 topics
- Aging5,443▲ 1.58×19 topics
- Complications5,433▲ 1.73×17 topics
- Heart Failure5,273▲ 1.87×14 topics
- Radiotherapy5,136▲ 2.1×13 topics
- Neoadjuvant Therapy4,824▲ 3.2×5 topics
- Prognosis4,800▲ 2.3×9 topics
- Surgery4,267▲ 1.94×12 topics
- Survival Analysis4,083▲ 2.4×7 topics
- Echocardiography4,000▲ 2.3×8 topics
- Modernization3,683▲ 3.2×5 topics
- Molecular Characterization3,645▲ 3.3×6 topics
- Endoscopic Resection3,093▲ 4.9×2 topics
- Adjuvant Therapy3,069▲ 3.9×2 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Japan has out-published Austria every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1001
- 4In the top 5008
- 9In the top 1,00016
- #20Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#13
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Austria or Japan?
Japan publishes 6.2× as much research as Austria in 2022-now (558k against 90k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Austria or Japan?
10.7% of Austria's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 6.0% for Japan.
Is Austria or Japan growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +4% against 2018-21 for Austria, and -5% for Japan.
Which has more open access research, Austria or Japan?
42% of Japan's research is free to read, against 37% of Austria's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Austria or Japan?
Japan holds 1 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Austria 0; in the top 1,000 it is 16 against 9.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Austria
- 1University of Vienna12.4% top 10% · 11k works
- 2Austrian Academy of Sciences13.5% top 10% · 2.9k works
- 3Universität Innsbruck11.7% top 10% · 5.8k works
- 4Medical University of Vienna12.3% top 10% · 6.7k works
- 5TU Wien8.6% top 10% · 6.4k works
- 6Johannes Kepler University of Linz9.7% top 10% · 3.7k works
Japan
- 1The University of Tokyo8.1% top 10% · 26k works
- 2Kyoto University7.5% top 10% · 16k works
- 3RIKEN11.4% top 10% · 4.7k works
- 4The University of Osaka7.0% top 10% · 13k works
- 5Nagoya University6.8% top 10% · 10k works
- 6Tohoku University7.6% top 10% · 14k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Austria
- 1 Jiřı́ Friml #255 worldwide 68k citations · 572 works
- 2 Joeri Rogelj #605 worldwide 45k citations · 454 works
- 3 Kim Nasmyth #833 worldwide 61k citations · 355 works
- 4 Thomas Jenuwein #1,397 worldwide 59k citations · 220 works
- 5 Yoshihide Wada #1,643 worldwide 57k citations · 642 works
Japan
- 1 Md. Rabiul Awual #6 worldwide 41k citations · 208 works
- 2 Ayyoob Sharifi #295 worldwide 23k citations · 468 works
- 3 A. S. Bell #544 worldwide 76k citations · 479 works
- 4 Noboru Mizushima #728 worldwide 143k citations · 420 works
- 5 Haoshen S. Zhou #1,003 worldwide 71k citations · 809 works
Other comparisons
Japanvs
Singapore
Japanvs
South Korea
Austriavs
South Korea
Denmarkvs
Japan
Austriavs
Denmark
Indiavs
Japan
Belgiumvs
Japan
Austriavs
India
Austriavs
Belgium
Austriavs
Israel