Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Compare · Countries

Belgium vs Japan

On research quality in 2022-now, Japan ranks #16 in the world and Belgium #19, of 189 countries. Belgium stands higher in 11 of the 26 fields both publish in, Japan in 15.

Research profiles alike: 0.13somewhat alike shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured

Compare other countries
vs

Belgium

World rank, 2022-now
#19
#19 all time
Works, 2022-now
106k
fractional
Top-10% rate
11.6%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
43%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Medical Terminology, Equine, Insect Science.

Japan

World rank, 2022-now
#16
#17 all time
Works, 2022-now
558k
fractional
Top-10% rate
6.0%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
42%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Condensed Matter Physics, Structural Biology, Gastroenterology.

Who leads, measure by measure?

Belgium leads on 4 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work and international co-authorship. Japan leads on 3 of 9 measures: research quality, output and growth. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100 and open access.

Belgium 42 level3 Japan
  1. #19Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#16
  2. 1.17×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.64×
  3. 106kOutputfractional works, 2022-now558k
  4. 11.6%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited6.0%
  5. 22.6Citations per workall time, per fractional work17.2
  6. 1World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1001
  7. 43%Open accessof its works free to read, all time42%
  8. 27%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time12%
  9. -13%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change-5%

A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.

Who leads in each field?

Belgium stands higher in 11 of 26 fields, Japan in 15. Japan leads most in Materials Science (#12 against #25); Belgium leads most in Veterinary (#14 against #17). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.

Belgium 1115 Japan
  1. #14Agricultural and Biological Sciences#16
  2. #15Arts and Humanities#22
  3. #19Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#13
  4. #21Business, Management and Accounting#26
  5. #15Chemical Engineering#13
  6. #20Chemistry#14
  7. #24Computer Science#16
  8. #18Decision Sciences#25
  9. #19Dentistry#12
  10. #20Earth and Planetary Sciences#15
  11. #18Economics, Econometrics and Finance#17
  12. #24Energy#21
  13. #18Engineering#16
  14. #17Environmental Science#20
  15. #19Health Professions#22
  16. #10Immunology and Microbiology#15
  17. #25Materials Science#12
  18. #19Mathematics#14
  19. #16Medicine#18
  20. #19Neuroscience#16
  21. #20Nursing#18
  22. #17Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics#13
  23. #20Physics and Astronomy#10
  24. #20Psychology#23
  25. #20Social Sciences#26
  26. #14Veterinary#17

Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.

The numbers behind each field

Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.

Field Belgium rankJapan rank Belgium top 10%Japan top 10% Belgium worksJapan works
Agricultural and Biological Sciences #14 #16 11.2% 6.4% 5.1k 16k
Arts and Humanities #15 #22 12.0% 9.5% 4.7k 5.2k
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology #19 #13 11.5% 5.5% 6.1k 41k
Business, Management and Accounting #21 #26 13.1% 6.2% 2.4k 5.2k
Chemical Engineering #15 #13 9.2% 4.8% 395 2.5k
Chemistry #20 #14 10.6% 4.8% 1.5k 12k
Computer Science #24 #16 9.5% 5.1% 5.9k 37k
Decision Sciences #18 #25 12.2% 5.7% 1k 2.9k
Dentistry #19 #12 16.8% 7.7% 419 2.9k
Earth and Planetary Sciences #20 #15 10.3% 6.7% 1.6k 8.7k
Economics, Econometrics and Finance #18 #17 12.0% 7.4% 2.4k 6.1k
Energy #24 #21 9.3% 6.9% 645 3.6k
Engineering #18 #16 9.8% 4.6% 14k 94k
Environmental Science #17 #20 10.8% 6.0% 5.1k 21k
Health Professions #19 #22 12.1% 6.9% 2.9k 8.9k
Immunology and Microbiology #10 #15 14.1% 6.3% 1.3k 7k
Materials Science #25 #12 9.3% 4.9% 2.8k 27k
Mathematics #19 #14 11.1% 6.3% 1.4k 6.9k
Medicine #16 #18 13.1% 6.6% 23k 167k
Neuroscience #19 #16 10.9% 5.2% 2.4k 14k
Nursing #20 #18 13.7% 5.6% 456 2.8k
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics #17 #13 10.1% 6.5% 264 2.6k
Physics and Astronomy #20 #10 11.0% 7.4% 2.8k 22k
Psychology #20 #23 11.2% 6.2% 3.9k 14k
Social Sciences #20 #26 12.3% 7.1% 13k 27k
Veterinary #14 #17 13.9% 5.0% 298 773

What is each known for?

The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.

Belgium

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology5,676▲ 1.18×140 topics
  2. Climate Change3,571◆ 1.09×131 topics
  3. Globalization2,872▲ 1.21×182 topics
  4. Machine Learning2,752▼ 0.68×95 topics
  5. Sustainability2,563◆ 0.87×139 topics
  6. Deep Learning2,543▼ 0.61×84 topics
  7. Inflammation2,452◆ 0.95×83 topics
  8. Quality of Life2,117▲ 1.21×61 topics
  9. Public Health1,899◆ 1.08×76 topics
  10. Environmental Impact1,870◆ 0.91×73 topics
  11. Mental Health1,824◆ 1.06×48 topics
  12. Treatment1,666◆ 1.13×52 topics
  13. Oxidative Stress1,578▼ 0.79×63 topics
  14. Biodiversity1,547▲ 1.68×38 topics
  15. Human Rights1,377◆ 1.11×90 topics
  16. Cardiovascular Disease1,345◆ 0.98×39 topics
  17. Renewable Energy1,332▼ 0.76×61 topics
  18. Diagnosis1,313▲ 1.17×41 topics
  19. Invasive Species1,118▲ 2.2×21 topics
  20. Identity1,090▲ 1.25×79 topics
  21. Genetics1,056▲ 1.24×27 topics
  22. Gender1,049▲ 1.62×58 topics
  23. Management1,048◆ 1.09×40 topics
  24. Clinical Trials974▲ 1.21×19 topics
  25. Social Justice970▲ 1.35×55 topics
  26. Religion929▲ 1.66×43 topics
  27. Colonialism917▲ 1.60×51 topics
  28. Evolution878▲ 2.7×19 topics
  29. Ethics878▲ 1.44×62 topics
  30. Conservation875▲ 1.69×24 topics
  31. Democracy797▲ 1.89×30 topics
  32. Phylogeny787▲ 3.9×17 topics
  33. Community Engagement766▲ 1.95×21 topics
  34. European Union738▲ 2.7×29 topics
  35. Taxonomy679▲ 3.9×15 topics
  36. Biogeography664▲ 1.97×20 topics
  37. DNA Barcoding651▲ 3.1×9 topics
  38. Territorial Governance539▲ 3.9×4 topics
  39. Local Development510▲ 4.1×2 topics
  40. Institutionalization460▲ 4.1×5 topics

Japan

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology32k▲ 1.28×140 topics
  2. Inflammation21k▲ 1.54×83 topics
  3. Deep Learning18k▼ 0.85×85 topics
  4. Machine Learning14k▼ 0.67×97 topics
  5. Treatment12k▲ 1.59×52 topics
  6. Oxidative Stress12k◆ 1.15×63 topics
  7. Climate Change12k▼ 0.69×132 topics
  8. Chemotherapy11k▲ 2.6×25 topics
  9. Quality of Life11k▲ 1.17×61 topics
  10. Cancer11k▲ 1.24×59 topics
  11. Diagnosis10k▲ 1.78×41 topics
  12. Nanoparticles9,087◆ 1.14×44 topics
  13. Biomedical Applications8,930▲ 1.20×36 topics
  14. Cardiovascular Disease8,839▲ 1.23×39 topics
  15. Immunotherapy8,823▲ 1.94×19 topics
  16. Neural Networks8,643◆ 0.89×42 topics
  17. Risk Factors8,023▲ 1.16×37 topics
  18. Clinical Practice Guidelines7,936▲ 2.3×14 topics
  19. Management7,655▲ 1.52×40 topics
  20. Mechanical Properties6,915◆ 1.12×39 topics
  21. Prognostic Factors6,756▲ 2.5×14 topics
  22. Surgical Management6,288▲ 2.4×20 topics
  23. Neurological Disorders5,916▲ 1.64×20 topics
  24. Tumor Microenvironment5,642▲ 1.98×8 topics
  25. Genetic Mutations5,620▲ 2.0×23 topics
  26. Clinical Trials5,573▲ 1.32×19 topics
  27. Guidelines5,493▲ 1.84×13 topics
  28. Aging5,443▲ 1.58×19 topics
  29. Complications5,433▲ 1.73×17 topics
  30. Heart Failure5,273▲ 1.87×14 topics
  31. Radiotherapy5,136▲ 2.1×13 topics
  32. Neoadjuvant Therapy4,824▲ 3.2×5 topics
  33. Prognosis4,800▲ 2.3×9 topics
  34. Surgery4,267▲ 1.94×12 topics
  35. Survival Analysis4,083▲ 2.4×7 topics
  36. Echocardiography4,000▲ 2.3×8 topics
  37. Modernization3,683▲ 3.2×5 topics
  38. Molecular Characterization3,645▲ 3.3×6 topics
  39. Endoscopic Resection3,093▲ 4.9×2 topics
  40. Adjuvant Therapy3,069▲ 3.9×2 topics

Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.

How has their output grown?

Japan has out-published Belgium every year since 1980.

still counting50k100k150kJapan144k in 2025Belgium27k in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works per year.

Their share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.

still counting5.0%10%Japan2.5% in 2025Belgium0.46% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).

still counting5%10%15%Belgium11.0% in 2025Japan6.4% in 2025200020102020

A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.

Who holds more of the world's best institutions?

A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.

Belgium 02 level3 Japan
  1. 0In the world top 500
  2. 1In the top 1001
  3. 6In the top 5008
  4. 9In the top 1,00016
  5. #17Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#13

Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.

Which publishes more research, Belgium or Japan?

Japan publishes 5.3× as much research as Belgium in 2022-now (558k against 106k fractional works).

Whose research has more impact, Belgium or Japan?

11.6% of Belgium's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 6.0% for Japan.

Is Belgium or Japan growing faster?

Output in 2022-25 was -5% against 2018-21 for Japan, and -13% for Belgium.

Which has more open access research, Belgium or Japan?

43% of Belgium's research is free to read, against 42% of Japan's.

Which has more world-class institutions, Belgium or Japan?

Belgium holds 1 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Japan 1; in the top 1,000 it is 9 against 16.

Which institutions lead in each country?

The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.

Belgium

  1. 1KU Leuven13.1% top 10% · 20k works
  2. 2Ghent University13.8% top 10% · 16k works
  3. 3University of Antwerp13.0% top 10% · 7.1k works
  4. 4UCLouvain10.1% top 10% · 7.4k works
  5. 5Vrije Universiteit Brussel13.0% top 10% · 6k works
  6. 6Université Libre de Bruxelles11.1% top 10% · 6.5k works

Japan

  1. 1The University of Tokyo8.1% top 10% · 26k works
  2. 2Kyoto University7.5% top 10% · 16k works
  3. 3RIKEN11.4% top 10% · 4.7k works
  4. 4The University of Osaka7.0% top 10% · 13k works
  5. 5Nagoya University6.8% top 10% · 10k works
  6. 6Tohoku University7.6% top 10% · 14k works

The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.

Who are the top researchers on each side?

The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.

Belgium

  1. 1 Jeroen Raes #1,855 worldwide 126k citations · 470 works
  2. 2 Sarah‐Maria Fendt #3,456 worldwide 20k citations · 242 works
  3. 3 M. Maes #3,749 worldwide 54k citations · 515 works
  4. 4 Mohamed Lamkanfi #4,281 worldwide 30k citations · 149 works
  5. 5 Diego G. Miralles #6,426 worldwide 38k citations · 485 works

Japan

  1. 1 Md. Rabiul Awual #6 worldwide 41k citations · 208 works
  2. 2 Ayyoob Sharifi #295 worldwide 23k citations · 468 works
  3. 3 A. S. Bell #544 worldwide 76k citations · 479 works
  4. 4 Noboru Mizushima #728 worldwide 143k citations · 420 works
  5. 5 Haoshen S. Zhou #1,003 worldwide 71k citations · 809 works

Other comparisons

Compare any two