Belgium vs Finland
On research quality in 2022-now, Belgium ranks #19 in the world and Finland #22, of 189 countries. Belgium stands higher in 19 of the 26 fields both publish in, Finland in 7.
Research profiles alike: 0.39somewhat alike shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Belgium
- World rank, 2022-now
- #19
- #19 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 106k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 11.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 43%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Medical Terminology, Equine, Insect Science.
Finland
- World rank, 2022-now
- #22
- #22 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 70k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 12.9%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 43%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Public Administration, Research and Theory, Music.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Belgium leads on 4 of 9 measures: research quality, output, institutions in the world top 100 and international co-authorship. Finland leads on 4 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work and growth. The two are level on open access.
- #19Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#22
- 1.17×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.21×
- 106kOutputfractional works, 2022-now70k
- 11.6%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited12.9%
- 22.6Citations per workall time, per fractional work27.6
- 1World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 43%Open accessof its works free to read, all time43%
- 27%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time26%
- -13%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+2%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Belgium stands higher in 19 of 26 fields, Finland in 7. Belgium leads most in Chemical Engineering (#15 against #24); Finland leads most in Energy (#19 against #24). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #14Agricultural and Biological Sciences#22
- #15Arts and Humanities#18
- #19Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#20
- #21Business, Management and Accounting#16
- #15Chemical Engineering#24
- #20Chemistry#26
- #24Computer Science#20
- #18Decision Sciences#19
- #19Dentistry#23
- #20Earth and Planetary Sciences#22
- #18Economics, Econometrics and Finance#24
- #24Energy#19
- #18Engineering#19
- #17Environmental Science#22
- #19Health Professions#21
- #10Immunology and Microbiology#20
- #25Materials Science#19
- #19Mathematics#22
- #16Medicine#21
- #19Neuroscience#21
- #20Nursing#17
- #17Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-
- #20Physics and Astronomy#22
- #20Psychology#16
- #20Social Sciences#17
- #14Veterinary-
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Belgium rank | Finland rank | Belgium top 10% | Finland top 10% | Belgium works | Finland works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #14 | #22 | 11.2% | 14.0% | 5.1k | 2.1k |
| Arts and Humanities | #15 | #18 | 12.0% | 15.0% | 4.7k | 3k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #19 | #20 | 11.5% | 11.5% | 6.1k | 3.2k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #21 | #16 | 13.1% | 17.1% | 2.4k | 2.8k |
| Chemical Engineering | #15 | #24 | 9.2% | 8.9% | 395 | 209 |
| Chemistry | #20 | #26 | 10.6% | 9.6% | 1.5k | 667 |
| Computer Science | #24 | #20 | 9.5% | 13.0% | 5.9k | 5.5k |
| Decision Sciences | #18 | #19 | 12.2% | 14.4% | 1k | 813 |
| Dentistry | #19 | #23 | 16.8% | 13.2% | 419 | 373 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #20 | #22 | 10.3% | 11.2% | 1.6k | 1.1k |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #18 | #24 | 12.0% | 12.2% | 2.4k | 1.2k |
| Energy | #24 | #19 | 9.3% | 12.9% | 645 | 475 |
| Engineering | #18 | #19 | 9.8% | 11.6% | 14k | 9.1k |
| Environmental Science | #17 | #22 | 10.8% | 12.4% | 5.1k | 4.3k |
| Health Professions | #19 | #21 | 12.1% | 11.6% | 2.9k | 2.3k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #10 | #20 | 14.1% | 11.7% | 1.3k | 473 |
| Materials Science | #25 | #19 | 9.3% | 10.3% | 2.8k | 1.7k |
| Mathematics | #19 | #22 | 11.1% | 12.8% | 1.4k | 735 |
| Medicine | #16 | #21 | 13.1% | 13.5% | 23k | 11k |
| Neuroscience | #19 | #21 | 10.9% | 11.6% | 2.4k | 1.2k |
| Nursing | #20 | #17 | 13.7% | 13.8% | 456 | 299 |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #17 | - | 10.1% | - | 264 | - |
| Physics and Astronomy | #20 | #22 | 11.0% | 10.9% | 2.8k | 1.6k |
| Psychology | #20 | #16 | 11.2% | 13.8% | 3.9k | 3.5k |
| Social Sciences | #20 | #17 | 12.3% | 13.4% | 13k | 13k |
| Veterinary | #14 | - | 13.9% | - | 298 | - |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Belgium
- Institutionalization
- Territorial Governance
- Biogeography
- European Union
- Phylogeny
- Conservation
- Evolution
- Religion
- Clinical Trials
- Gender
- Identity
- Diagnosis
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Biodiversity
- Treatment
- Environmental Impact
- Quality of Life
- Deep Learning
- Machine Learning
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Globalization
- Sustainability
- Inflammation
- Public Health
- Mental Health
- Oxidative Stress
- Human Rights
- Renewable Energy
- Invasive Species
- Genetics
- Management
- Social Justice
- Colonialism
- Ethics
- Democracy
- Community Engagement
- Taxonomy
- DNA Barcoding
- Local Development
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology5,676▲ 1.18×140 topics
- Climate Change3,571◆ 1.09×131 topics
- Globalization2,872▲ 1.21×182 topics
- Machine Learning2,752▼ 0.68×95 topics
- Sustainability2,563◆ 0.87×139 topics
- Deep Learning2,543▼ 0.61×84 topics
- Inflammation2,452◆ 0.95×83 topics
- Quality of Life2,117▲ 1.21×61 topics
- Public Health1,899◆ 1.08×76 topics
- Environmental Impact1,870◆ 0.91×73 topics
- Mental Health1,824◆ 1.06×48 topics
- Treatment1,666◆ 1.13×52 topics
- Oxidative Stress1,578▼ 0.79×63 topics
- Biodiversity1,547▲ 1.68×38 topics
- Human Rights1,377◆ 1.11×90 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease1,345◆ 0.98×39 topics
- Renewable Energy1,332▼ 0.76×61 topics
- Diagnosis1,313▲ 1.17×41 topics
- Invasive Species1,118▲ 2.2×21 topics
- Identity1,090▲ 1.25×79 topics
- Genetics1,056▲ 1.24×27 topics
- Gender1,049▲ 1.62×58 topics
- Management1,048◆ 1.09×40 topics
- Clinical Trials974▲ 1.21×19 topics
- Social Justice970▲ 1.35×55 topics
- Religion929▲ 1.66×43 topics
- Colonialism917▲ 1.60×51 topics
- Evolution878▲ 2.7×19 topics
- Ethics878▲ 1.44×62 topics
- Conservation875▲ 1.69×24 topics
- Democracy797▲ 1.89×30 topics
- Phylogeny787▲ 3.9×17 topics
- Community Engagement766▲ 1.95×21 topics
- European Union738▲ 2.7×29 topics
- Taxonomy679▲ 3.9×15 topics
- Biogeography664▲ 1.97×20 topics
- DNA Barcoding651▲ 3.1×9 topics
- Territorial Governance539▲ 3.9×4 topics
- Local Development510▲ 4.1×2 topics
- Institutionalization460▲ 4.1×5 topics
Finland
- Participatory Design
- Physical Activity
- Social Interaction
- Social Capital
- Identity
- Depression
- Remote Sensing
- Artificial Intelligence
- Quality of Life
- Renewable Energy
- Environmental Impact
- Inflammation
- Globalization
- Machine Learning
- Family Dynamics
- Phenomenology
- Epidemiology
- Pedagogy
- Climate Change
- Healthcare
- Education
- Ethics
- Qualitative Research
- Communication
- Social Sciences
- Sustainability
- Work Environment
- Deep Learning
- Mental Health
- Public Health
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Social Media
- Big Data
- Energy Efficiency
- Innovation
- Biodiversity
- Health Effects
- Well-being
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Neoliberalism
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Education3,577▲ 2.6×146 topics
- Healthcare3,177▲ 3.5×41 topics
- Ethics3,174▲ 7.8×57 topics
- Climate Change3,133▲ 1.44×128 topics
- Qualitative Research2,935▲ 4.3×42 topics
- Pedagogy2,767▲ 6.9×30 topics
- Communication2,716▲ 11×23 topics
- Epidemiology2,620▼ 0.82×140 topics
- Social Sciences2,571▲ 22×19 topics
- Phenomenology2,562▲ 30×5 topics
- Sustainability2,451▲ 1.25×130 topics
- Family Dynamics2,440▲ 24×8 topics
- Work Environment2,421▲ 171×2 topics
- Machine Learning2,389◆ 0.90×94 topics
- Deep Learning2,063▼ 0.75×84 topics
- Globalization1,975▲ 1.25×175 topics
- Mental Health1,474▲ 1.29×47 topics
- Inflammation1,451▼ 0.85×83 topics
- Public Health1,335◆ 1.14×74 topics
- Environmental Impact1,291◆ 0.94×70 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease1,212▲ 1.33×39 topics
- Renewable Energy1,211◆ 1.04×59 topics
- Social Media1,105◆ 1.00×41 topics
- Quality of Life1,084◆ 0.94×61 topics
- Big Data1,031▲ 1.35×36 topics
- Artificial Intelligence1,017◆ 0.89×63 topics
- Energy Efficiency881▲ 1.19×45 topics
- Remote Sensing880◆ 0.90×42 topics
- Innovation865◆ 1.05×84 topics
- Depression810◆ 1.15×25 topics
- Biodiversity752▲ 1.23×38 topics
- Identity708▲ 1.22×75 topics
- Health Effects691▲ 1.42×24 topics
- Social Capital686▲ 1.65×21 topics
- Well-being637▲ 2.0×14 topics
- Social Interaction628▲ 2.0×11 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation609▲ 2.0×22 topics
- Physical Activity603▲ 1.55×13 topics
- Neoliberalism593▲ 2.1×29 topics
- Participatory Design281▲ 6.6×2 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Belgium has out-published Finland every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 1In the top 1000
- 6In the top 5005
- 9In the top 1,0008
- #17Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#22
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Belgium or Finland?
Belgium publishes 1.5× as much research as Finland in 2022-now (106k against 70k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Belgium or Finland?
12.9% of Finland's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 11.6% for Belgium.
Is Belgium or Finland growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +2% against 2018-21 for Finland, and -13% for Belgium.
Which has more open access research, Belgium or Finland?
43% of Belgium's research is free to read, against 43% of Finland's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Belgium or Finland?
Belgium holds 1 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Finland 0; in the top 1,000 it is 9 against 8.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Belgium
- 1KU Leuven13.1% top 10% · 20k works
- 2Ghent University13.8% top 10% · 16k works
- 3University of Antwerp13.0% top 10% · 7.1k works
- 4UCLouvain10.1% top 10% · 7.4k works
- 5Vrije Universiteit Brussel13.0% top 10% · 6k works
- 6Université Libre de Bruxelles11.1% top 10% · 6.5k works
Finland
- 1University of Helsinki13.2% top 10% · 15k works
- 2Aalto University13.6% top 10% · 6.2k works
- 3University of Oulu14.8% top 10% · 5.7k works
- 4University of Turku12.1% top 10% · 6.9k works
- 5Tampere University12.8% top 10% · 6.4k works
- 6University of Jyväskylä13.9% top 10% · 3.7k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Belgium
- 1 Jeroen Raes #1,855 worldwide 126k citations · 470 works
- 2 Sarah‐Maria Fendt #3,456 worldwide 20k citations · 242 works
- 3 M. Maes #3,749 worldwide 54k citations · 515 works
- 4 Mohamed Lamkanfi #4,281 worldwide 30k citations · 149 works
- 5 Diego G. Miralles #6,426 worldwide 38k citations · 485 works
Finland
- 1 M. Linden-Vørnle #1,674 worldwide 57k citations · 184 works
- 2 Tuomo J Meretoja #1,759 worldwide 178k citations · 247 works
- 3 A.-S. Suur-Uski #2,517 worldwide 77k citations · 200 works
- 4 Atte Meretoja #3,853 worldwide 208k citations · 270 works
- 5 Samuli Ripatti #3,897 worldwide 92k citations · 730 works
Other comparisons
Belgiumvs
Japan
Austriavs
Belgium
Belgiumvs
India
Belgiumvs
Israel
Belgiumvs
Norway
Finlandvs
Israel
Finlandvs
Norway
Finlandvs
Poland
Finlandvs
Taiwan
Finlandvs
New Zealand