India vs Norway
On research quality in 2022-now, India ranks #18 in the world and Norway #21, of 189 countries. India stands higher in 15 of the 26 fields both publish in, Norway in 11.
Research profiles alike: -0.69different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
India
- World rank, 2022-now
- #18
- #20 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 1.4M
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 6.5%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 40%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Drug Discovery, Pharmaceutical Science, Complementary and alternative medicine.
Norway
- World rank, 2022-now
- #21
- #21 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 81k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 12.8%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 47%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Public Administration, Research and Theory, Ocean Engineering.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Norway leads on 5 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, open access and international co-authorship. India leads on 3 of 9 measures: research quality, output and growth. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #18Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#21
- 0.67×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.27×
- 1.4MOutputfractional works, 2022-now81k
- 6.5%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited12.8%
- 12.0Citations per workall time, per fractional work26.2
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 40%Open accessof its works free to read, all time47%
- 11%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time31%
- +48%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+4%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
India stands higher in 15 of 26 fields, Norway in 11. India leads most in Chemistry (#5 against #34); Norway leads most in Psychology (#14 against #35). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #17Agricultural and Biological Sciences#27
- #23Arts and Humanities#17
- #21Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#23
- #18Business, Management and Accounting#19
- #6Chemical Engineering#23
- #5Chemistry#34
- #19Computer Science#22
- #14Decision Sciences#17
- #27Dentistry#26
- #23Earth and Planetary Sciences#10
- #20Economics, Econometrics and Finance#19
- #15Energy#16
- #15Engineering#21
- #18Environmental Science#13
- #23Health Professions#16
- #28Immunology and Microbiology#21
- #14Materials Science#24
- #17Mathematics#23
- #30Medicine#19
- #27Neuroscience#20
- #23Nursing#26
- #8Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-
- #19Physics and Astronomy#24
- #35Psychology#14
- #36Social Sciences#15
- #19Veterinary-
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | India rank | Norway rank | India top 10% | Norway top 10% | India works | Norway works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #17 | #27 | 6.9% | 12.7% | 108k | 2.2k |
| Arts and Humanities | #23 | #17 | 8.5% | 14.9% | 17k | 3.2k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #21 | #23 | 6.2% | 10.9% | 70k | 3.3k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #18 | #19 | 8.9% | 14.4% | 37k | 2.5k |
| Chemical Engineering | #6 | #23 | 7.6% | 8.5% | 5.8k | 238 |
| Chemistry | #5 | #34 | 7.8% | 8.5% | 38k | 541 |
| Computer Science | #19 | #22 | 6.5% | 12.7% | 167k | 5.1k |
| Decision Sciences | #14 | #17 | 7.7% | 13.0% | 15k | 1.2k |
| Dentistry | #27 | #26 | 4.1% | 13.2% | 15k | 273 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #23 | #10 | 7.0% | 11.8% | 14k | 2.6k |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #20 | #19 | 7.3% | 13.1% | 22k | 1.7k |
| Energy | #15 | #16 | 6.9% | 11.6% | 17k | 710 |
| Engineering | #15 | #21 | 7.0% | 10.1% | 261k | 11k |
| Environmental Science | #18 | #13 | 7.7% | 11.2% | 65k | 5.9k |
| Health Professions | #23 | #16 | 6.8% | 13.1% | 29k | 3.1k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #28 | #21 | 5.7% | 12.2% | 10k | 773 |
| Materials Science | #14 | #24 | 7.2% | 9.8% | 71k | 1.2k |
| Mathematics | #17 | #23 | 9.0% | 12.6% | 17k | 749 |
| Medicine | #30 | #19 | 4.8% | 14.0% | 254k | 14k |
| Neuroscience | #27 | #20 | 5.9% | 11.1% | 19k | 1.4k |
| Nursing | #23 | #26 | 6.6% | 12.6% | 8.5k | 356 |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #8 | - | 6.4% | - | 11k | - |
| Physics and Astronomy | #19 | #24 | 6.2% | 10.2% | 26k | 1.3k |
| Psychology | #35 | #14 | 5.2% | 13.7% | 26k | 5.1k |
| Social Sciences | #36 | #15 | 7.2% | 15.5% | 61k | 13k |
| Veterinary | #19 | - | 4.3% | - | 1.6k | - |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
India
- Smart Farming
- Feature Selection
- Privacy
- Smart Cities
- IoT Security
- Environmental Monitoring
- Feature Extraction
- Medical Imaging
- Energy Efficiency
- Data Mining
- COVID-19
- Renewable Energy
- Security
- Nanomaterials
- Convolutional Neural Networks
- Internet of Things
- Nanoparticles
- Neural Networks
- Sustainability
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
- Epidemiology
- Climate Change
- Healthcare
- Environmental Impact
- Artificial Intelligence
- Biomedical Applications
- Inflammation
- Oxidative Stress
- Antioxidant
- Mechanical Properties
- Wireless Sensor Networks
- Big Data
- Graphene
- IoT
- Image Processing
- Classification
- Big Data Analytics
- Cybersecurity
- India
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Deep Learning122k▲ 2.2×85 topics
- Machine Learning110k▲ 2.0×97 topics
- Epidemiology62k◆ 0.97×140 topics
- Sustainability43k◆ 1.10×139 topics
- Climate Change40k◆ 0.92×132 topics
- Neural Networks37k▲ 1.50×42 topics
- Healthcare37k▲ 1.99×43 topics
- Nanoparticles34k▲ 1.68×44 topics
- Environmental Impact34k▲ 1.22×74 topics
- Internet of Things32k▲ 2.3×33 topics
- Artificial Intelligence29k▲ 1.28×67 topics
- Convolutional Neural Networks29k▲ 2.5×14 topics
- Biomedical Applications29k▲ 1.51×36 topics
- Nanomaterials29k▲ 1.71×21 topics
- Inflammation29k▼ 0.84×83 topics
- Security29k▲ 2.6×31 topics
- Oxidative Stress28k◆ 1.04×63 topics
- Renewable Energy27k▲ 1.18×61 topics
- Antioxidant24k▲ 2.2×51 topics
- COVID-1924k◆ 1.13×34 topics
- Mechanical Properties23k▲ 1.44×39 topics
- Data Mining22k▲ 1.88×25 topics
- Wireless Sensor Networks22k▲ 3.1×23 topics
- Energy Efficiency22k▲ 1.47×46 topics
- Big Data21k▲ 1.37×37 topics
- Medical Imaging19k▲ 2.2×9 topics
- Graphene19k▲ 1.74×12 topics
- Feature Extraction19k▲ 2.6×10 topics
- IoT18k▲ 3.0×19 topics
- Environmental Monitoring18k▲ 2.9×19 topics
- Image Processing18k▲ 2.5×14 topics
- IoT Security17k▲ 3.5×3 topics
- Classification17k▲ 2.3×13 topics
- Smart Cities14k▲ 3.4×8 topics
- Big Data Analytics13k▲ 3.9×5 topics
- Privacy13k▲ 2.8×11 topics
- Cybersecurity13k▲ 3.1×6 topics
- Feature Selection12k▲ 3.5×6 topics
- India11k▲ 9.1×4 topics
- Smart Farming10k▲ 5.5×2 topics
Norway
- European Legal Systems
- Constitutionalism
- Technical Decision-making
- Dementia Care
- Ocean Circulation
- Ethical Guidelines
- Tacit Knowledge
- Well-being
- Religion
- Global Warming
- Resilience
- Risk Factors
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Remote Sensing
- Education
- Public Health
- Renewable Energy
- Globalization
- Machine Learning
- Epidemiology
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Deep Learning
- Mental Health
- Environmental Impact
- Inflammation
- Quality of Life
- Depression
- Human Rights
- Ethics
- Democracy
- Embodiment
- Invasive Species
- Aquaculture
- Arctic
- Social Science
- Pragmatism
- Interactional Expertise
- Fisheries Sustainability
- ECHR
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change4,529▲ 1.81×130 topics
- Epidemiology3,392◆ 0.93×140 topics
- Sustainability2,832▲ 1.26×137 topics
- Machine Learning2,813◆ 0.92×97 topics
- Deep Learning2,229▼ 0.70×85 topics
- Globalization2,190▲ 1.21×181 topics
- Mental Health2,024▲ 1.54×48 topics
- Renewable Energy1,984▲ 1.49×61 topics
- Environmental Impact1,867▲ 1.19×74 topics
- Public Health1,651▲ 1.23×76 topics
- Inflammation1,586▼ 0.81×83 topics
- Education1,547◆ 0.98×157 topics
- Quality of Life1,464◆ 1.10×61 topics
- Remote Sensing1,286◆ 1.14×40 topics
- Depression1,172▲ 1.45×26 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease1,141◆ 1.09×39 topics
- Human Rights1,138▲ 1.21×88 topics
- Risk Factors1,114◆ 1.10×37 topics
- Ethics917▲ 1.97×59 topics
- Resilience899▲ 1.99×19 topics
- Democracy824▲ 2.6×30 topics
- Global Warming762▲ 1.94×16 topics
- Embodiment756▲ 4.4×7 topics
- Religion751▲ 1.76×43 topics
- Invasive Species740▲ 1.90×21 topics
- Well-being708▲ 1.98×14 topics
- Aquaculture699▲ 3.0×8 topics
- Tacit Knowledge638▲ 15×3 topics
- Arctic600▲ 5.9×4 topics
- Ethical Guidelines519▲ 11×4 topics
- Social Science508▲ 15×7 topics
- Ocean Circulation494▲ 3.9×3 topics
- Pragmatism481▲ 21×4 topics
- Dementia Care473▲ 42×2 topics
- Interactional Expertise460▲ 46×1 topic
- Technical Decision-making460▲ 46×1 topic
- Fisheries Sustainability459▲ 5.8×2 topics
- Constitutionalism432▲ 5.3×6 topics
- ECHR375▲ 12×1 topic
- European Legal Systems375▲ 12×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
India has out-published Norway every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 2In the top 5003
- 15In the top 1,0007
- #16Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#23
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, India or Norway?
India publishes 17.1× as much research as Norway in 2022-now (1.4M against 81k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, India or Norway?
12.8% of Norway's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 6.5% for India.
Is India or Norway growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +48% against 2018-21 for India, and +4% for Norway.
Which has more open access research, India or Norway?
47% of Norway's research is free to read, against 40% of India's.
Which has more world-class institutions, India or Norway?
India holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Norway 0; in the top 1,000 it is 15 against 7.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
India
- 1Indian Institute of Science Bangalore7.1% top 10% · 8.1k works
- 2Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur9.3% top 10% · 10k works
- 3Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati7.3% top 10% · 7k works
- 4Indian Institute of Technology Bombay6.4% top 10% · 9.1k works
- 5Indian Institute of Technology Madras6.3% top 10% · 9.4k works
- 6Indian Institute of Technology Delhi8.4% top 10% · 11k works
Norway
- 1Norwegian University of Science and Technology13.6% top 10% · 12k works
- 2University of Oslo14.4% top 10% · 13k works
- 3University of Bergen13.1% top 10% · 6.5k works
- 4University of Stavanger14.0% top 10% · 3.2k works
- 5UiT The Arctic University of Norway12.1% top 10% · 3.7k works
- 6Norwegian Institute of Public Health15.2% top 10% · 1k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
India
- 1 Sanjit Mitra #61 worldwide 167k citations · 467 works
- 2 C. Mishra #208 worldwide 84k citations · 251 works
- 3 Sachin Kumar Mangla #416 worldwide 25k citations · 373 works
- 4 S. J. Kapadia #575 worldwide 52k citations · 233 works
- 5 P. Ajith #693 worldwide 82k citations · 285 works
Norway
- 1 Amandeep Dhir #8 worldwide 33k citations · 319 works
- 2 Glen P. Peters #264 worldwide 69k citations · 451 works
- 3 Puneet Kaur #1,322 worldwide 18k citations · 209 works
- 4 Edvard Ingjald Moser #1,526 worldwide 53k citations · 437 works
- 5 Simon Elias Bibri #1,816 worldwide 12k citations · 146 works
Other comparisons
Denmarkvs
India
Indiavs
Japan
Austriavs
India
Belgiumvs
India
Israelvs
India
Belgiumvs
Norway
Israelvs
Norway
Finlandvs
Norway
Norwayvs
Poland
Norwayvs
Taiwan