Norway vs Poland
On research quality in 2022-now, Norway ranks #21 in the world and Poland #23, of 189 countries. Norway stands higher in 18 of the 26 fields both publish in, Poland in 8.
Research profiles alike: -0.02different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Norway
- World rank, 2022-now
- #21
- #21 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 81k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 12.8%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 47%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Public Administration, Research and Theory, Ocean Engineering.
Poland
- World rank, 2022-now
- #23
- #28 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 250k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 9.2%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 49%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Linguistics and Language, General Social Sciences, History.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Norway leads on 6 of 9 measures: research quality, excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, international co-authorship and growth. Poland leads on 2 of 9 measures: output and open access. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #21Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#23
- 1.27×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.93×
- 81kOutputfractional works, 2022-now250k
- 12.8%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited9.2%
- 26.2Citations per workall time, per fractional work9.2
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 47%Open accessof its works free to read, all time49%
- 31%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time13%
- +4%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change-11%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Norway stands higher in 18 of 26 fields, Poland in 8. Norway leads most in Earth and Planetary Sciences (#10 against #35); Poland leads most in Chemistry (#17 against #34). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #27Agricultural and Biological Sciences#21
- #17Arts and Humanities#19
- #23Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#25
- #19Business, Management and Accounting#25
- #23Chemical Engineering#25
- #34Chemistry#17
- #22Computer Science#23
- #17Decision Sciences#30
- #26Dentistry#18
- #10Earth and Planetary Sciences#35
- #19Economics, Econometrics and Finance#21
- #16Energy#22
- #21Engineering#25
- #13Environmental Science#28
- #16Health Professions#28
- #21Immunology and Microbiology#30
- #24Materials Science#17
- #23Mathematics#24
- #19Medicine#29
- #20Neuroscience#29
- #26Nursing#21
- -Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics#18
- #24Physics and Astronomy#23
- #14Psychology#30
- #15Social Sciences#24
- -Veterinary#16
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Norway rank | Poland rank | Norway top 10% | Poland top 10% | Norway works | Poland works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #27 | #21 | 12.7% | 11.8% | 2.2k | 12k |
| Arts and Humanities | #17 | #19 | 14.9% | 9.8% | 3.2k | 17k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #23 | #25 | 10.9% | 9.3% | 3.3k | 12k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #19 | #25 | 14.4% | 8.7% | 2.5k | 7.4k |
| Chemical Engineering | #23 | #25 | 8.5% | 7.2% | 238 | 905 |
| Chemistry | #34 | #17 | 8.5% | 9.0% | 541 | 4.5k |
| Computer Science | #22 | #23 | 12.7% | 8.1% | 5.1k | 11k |
| Decision Sciences | #17 | #30 | 13.0% | 8.1% | 1.2k | 1.7k |
| Dentistry | #26 | #18 | 13.2% | 20.1% | 273 | 965 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #10 | #35 | 11.8% | 7.1% | 2.6k | 3.3k |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #19 | #21 | 13.1% | 8.5% | 1.7k | 6.7k |
| Energy | #16 | #22 | 11.6% | 10.1% | 710 | 2.1k |
| Engineering | #21 | #25 | 10.1% | 8.3% | 11k | 32k |
| Environmental Science | #13 | #28 | 11.2% | 9.0% | 5.9k | 12k |
| Health Professions | #16 | #28 | 13.1% | 10.4% | 3.1k | 3.7k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #21 | #30 | 12.2% | 9.9% | 773 | 2.1k |
| Materials Science | #24 | #17 | 9.8% | 7.2% | 1.2k | 8.7k |
| Mathematics | #23 | #24 | 12.6% | 8.1% | 749 | 2.9k |
| Medicine | #19 | #29 | 14.0% | 10.5% | 14k | 40k |
| Neuroscience | #20 | #29 | 11.1% | 8.9% | 1.4k | 3.4k |
| Nursing | #26 | #21 | 12.6% | 12.0% | 356 | 1.3k |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | - | #18 | - | 12.5% | - | 779 |
| Physics and Astronomy | #24 | #23 | 10.2% | 7.3% | 1.3k | 5.6k |
| Psychology | #14 | #30 | 13.7% | 8.2% | 5.1k | 7k |
| Social Sciences | #15 | #24 | 15.5% | 8.7% | 13k | 50k |
| Veterinary | - | #16 | - | 10.4% | - | 359 |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Norway
- European Legal Systems
- Constitutionalism
- Technical Decision-making
- Dementia Care
- Ocean Circulation
- Ethical Guidelines
- Tacit Knowledge
- Well-being
- Religion
- Global Warming
- Resilience
- Risk Factors
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Remote Sensing
- Education
- Public Health
- Renewable Energy
- Globalization
- Machine Learning
- Epidemiology
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Deep Learning
- Mental Health
- Environmental Impact
- Inflammation
- Quality of Life
- Depression
- Human Rights
- Ethics
- Democracy
- Embodiment
- Invasive Species
- Aquaculture
- Arctic
- Social Science
- Pragmatism
- Interactional Expertise
- Fisheries Sustainability
- ECHR
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change4,529▲ 1.81×130 topics
- Epidemiology3,392◆ 0.93×140 topics
- Sustainability2,832▲ 1.26×137 topics
- Machine Learning2,813◆ 0.92×97 topics
- Deep Learning2,229▼ 0.70×85 topics
- Globalization2,190▲ 1.21×181 topics
- Mental Health2,024▲ 1.54×48 topics
- Renewable Energy1,984▲ 1.49×61 topics
- Environmental Impact1,867▲ 1.19×74 topics
- Public Health1,651▲ 1.23×76 topics
- Inflammation1,586▼ 0.81×83 topics
- Education1,547◆ 0.98×157 topics
- Quality of Life1,464◆ 1.10×61 topics
- Remote Sensing1,286◆ 1.14×40 topics
- Depression1,172▲ 1.45×26 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease1,141◆ 1.09×39 topics
- Human Rights1,138▲ 1.21×88 topics
- Risk Factors1,114◆ 1.10×37 topics
- Ethics917▲ 1.97×59 topics
- Resilience899▲ 1.99×19 topics
- Democracy824▲ 2.6×30 topics
- Global Warming762▲ 1.94×16 topics
- Embodiment756▲ 4.4×7 topics
- Religion751▲ 1.76×43 topics
- Invasive Species740▲ 1.90×21 topics
- Well-being708▲ 1.98×14 topics
- Aquaculture699▲ 3.0×8 topics
- Tacit Knowledge638▲ 15×3 topics
- Arctic600▲ 5.9×4 topics
- Ethical Guidelines519▲ 11×4 topics
- Social Science508▲ 15×7 topics
- Ocean Circulation494▲ 3.9×3 topics
- Pragmatism481▲ 21×4 topics
- Dementia Care473▲ 42×2 topics
- Interactional Expertise460▲ 46×1 topic
- Technical Decision-making460▲ 46×1 topic
- Fisheries Sustainability459▲ 5.8×2 topics
- Constitutionalism432▲ 5.3×6 topics
- ECHR375▲ 12×1 topic
- European Legal Systems375▲ 12×1 topic
Poland
- Anthropology
- Historiography
- Social Change
- Digital Innovations
- European Union Law
- Ethnolinguistics
- Social Sciences
- Translation
- Multilingualism
- Language
- Sociolinguistics
- Ethics
- Polish history
- Cultural Identity
- Soviet Union
- Literature
- Ethnography
- Nationalism
- European Union
- Education
- Globalization
- Cultural Studies
- Human Rights
- Migration
- Innovation
- Eastern Europe
- Pedagogy
- Cultural Discourse
- Polish minority
- Cultural Heritage
- Culture
- Urban Development
- Lexicography
- Media Discourse
- Lifelong Learning
- Public Administration
- Youth Development
- National Identity
- Data Privacy
- Memory Studies
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization11k▲ 2.1×185 topics
- Education10k▲ 2.2×159 topics
- Cultural Studies7,244▲ 7.1×45 topics
- European Union7,132▲ 12×29 topics
- Human Rights6,479▲ 2.3×90 topics
- Nationalism6,245▲ 5.0×34 topics
- Migration6,012▲ 6.4×35 topics
- Ethnography5,863▲ 12×16 topics
- Innovation5,612▲ 1.97×90 topics
- Literature5,338▲ 3.5×64 topics
- Eastern Europe5,308▲ 37×3 topics
- Soviet Union5,301▲ 35×3 topics
- Pedagogy4,873▲ 3.5×30 topics
- Cultural Identity4,864▲ 3.5×40 topics
- Cultural Discourse4,864▲ 49×3 topics
- Polish history4,844▲ 71×1 topic
- Polish minority4,844▲ 71×1 topic
- Ethics4,813▲ 3.4×62 topics
- Cultural Heritage4,748▲ 3.2×40 topics
- Sociolinguistics4,605▲ 9.1×9 topics
- Culture4,528▲ 3.1×40 topics
- Language4,404▲ 6.4×15 topics
- Urban Development4,401▲ 4.5×23 topics
- Multilingualism4,107▲ 9.2×6 topics
- Lexicography4,106▲ 17×5 topics
- Translation4,103▲ 9.0×7 topics
- Media Discourse3,674▲ 21×4 topics
- Social Sciences3,670▲ 9.2×24 topics
- Lifelong Learning3,640▲ 6.4×11 topics
- Ethnolinguistics3,637▲ 44×2 topics
- Public Administration3,554▲ 16×6 topics
- European Union Law3,482▲ 79×2 topics
- Youth Development3,383▲ 13×9 topics
- Digital Innovations3,236▲ 81×1 topic
- National Identity3,110▲ 9.7×11 topics
- Social Change3,067▲ 9.0×21 topics
- Data Privacy2,893▲ 9.6×4 topics
- Historiography2,859▲ 8.5×15 topics
- Memory Studies2,850▲ 16×6 topics
- Anthropology2,767▲ 11×11 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Poland has out-published Norway every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 3In the top 5001
- 7In the top 1,0005
- #23Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#29
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Norway or Poland?
Poland publishes 3.1× as much research as Norway in 2022-now (250k against 81k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Norway or Poland?
12.8% of Norway's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 9.2% for Poland.
Is Norway or Poland growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +4% against 2018-21 for Norway, and -11% for Poland.
Which has more open access research, Norway or Poland?
49% of Poland's research is free to read, against 47% of Norway's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Norway or Poland?
Norway holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Poland 0; in the top 1,000 it is 7 against 5.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Norway
- 1Norwegian University of Science and Technology13.6% top 10% · 12k works
- 2University of Oslo14.4% top 10% · 13k works
- 3University of Bergen13.1% top 10% · 6.5k works
- 4University of Stavanger14.0% top 10% · 3.2k works
- 5UiT The Arctic University of Norway12.1% top 10% · 3.7k works
- 6Norwegian Institute of Public Health15.2% top 10% · 1k works
Poland
- 1Polish Academy of Sciences9.4% top 10% · 21k works
- 2Jagiellonian University8.7% top 10% · 14k works
- 3University of Warsaw8.8% top 10% · 11k works
- 4AGH University of Krakow9.1% top 10% · 8k works
- 5University of Wrocław7.6% top 10% · 4.2k works
- 6Wrocław University of Science and Technology8.6% top 10% · 3.4k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Norway
- 1 Amandeep Dhir #8 worldwide 33k citations · 319 works
- 2 Glen P. Peters #264 worldwide 69k citations · 451 works
- 3 Puneet Kaur #1,322 worldwide 18k citations · 209 works
- 4 Edvard Ingjald Moser #1,526 worldwide 53k citations · 437 works
- 5 Simon Elias Bibri #1,816 worldwide 12k citations · 146 works
Poland
- 1 P. Jaranowski #637 worldwide 94k citations · 375 works
- 2 T. Kunigo #1,235 worldwide 24k citations · 283 works
- 3 N. Haddad #1,253 worldwide 21k citations · 240 works
- 4 O. Arslan #1,266 worldwide 42k citations · 484 works
- 5 M. Lisovyi #1,357 worldwide 65k citations · 863 works
Other comparisons
Indiavs
Norway
Belgiumvs
Norway
Israelvs
Norway
Israelvs
Poland
Finlandvs
Norway
Norwayvs
Taiwan
Finlandvs
Poland
Polandvs
Taiwan
New Zealandvs
Poland
Czechiavs
Poland