Lebanon vs Lithuania
On research quality in 2022-now, Lithuania ranks #73 in the world and Lebanon #76, of 189 countries. Lebanon stands higher in 3 of the 19 fields both publish in, Lithuania in 16.
Research profiles alike: 0.32somewhat alike shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Lebanon
- World rank, 2022-now
- #76
- #75 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 15k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 11.8%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 44%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Modeling and Simulation, Orthodontics, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Lithuania
- World rank, 2022-now
- #73
- #71 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 20k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 8.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 65%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Energy, Language and Linguistics, Algebra and Number Theory.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Lebanon leads on 5 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, international co-authorship and growth. Lithuania leads on 3 of 9 measures: research quality, output and open access. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #76Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#73
- 0.95×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.71×
- 15kOutputfractional works, 2022-now20k
- 11.8%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited8.4%
- 14.9Citations per workall time, per fractional work8.7
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 44%Open accessof its works free to read, all time65%
- 36%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time18%
- +17%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+6%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Lebanon stands higher in 3 of 19 fields, Lithuania in 16. Lithuania leads most in Materials Science (#56 against #79); Lebanon leads most in Mathematics (#66 against #72). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #94Agricultural and Biological Sciences#63
- #81Arts and Humanities#63
- #72Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#47
- #72Business, Management and Accounting#62
- -Chemistry#64
- #60Computer Science#65
- -Decision Sciences#59
- -Earth and Planetary Sciences#71
- #61Economics, Econometrics and Finance#64
- #66Engineering#62
- #89Environmental Science#70
- #76Health Professions#63
- #79Materials Science#56
- #66Mathematics#72
- #85Medicine#83
- #61Neuroscience#50
- -Physics and Astronomy#60
- #62Psychology#55
- #84Social Sciences#77
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Lebanon rank | Lithuania rank | Lebanon top 10% | Lithuania top 10% | Lebanon works | Lithuania works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #94 | #63 | 11.3% | 12.2% | 451 | 1.1k |
| Arts and Humanities | #81 | #63 | 11.2% | 8.7% | 284 | 1.2k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #72 | #47 | 9.2% | 8.2% | 615 | 796 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #72 | #62 | 15.1% | 10.4% | 627 | 996 |
| Chemistry | - | #64 | - | 8.9% | - | 222 |
| Computer Science | #60 | #65 | 13.0% | 9.0% | 1.1k | 1.1k |
| Decision Sciences | - | #59 | - | 11.8% | - | 207 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | - | #71 | - | 5.6% | - | 240 |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #61 | #64 | 22.4% | 10.1% | 537 | 683 |
| Engineering | #66 | #62 | 11.4% | 7.2% | 1.6k | 2.7k |
| Environmental Science | #89 | #70 | 11.2% | 8.6% | 560 | 1.1k |
| Health Professions | #76 | #63 | 13.9% | 8.3% | 448 | 479 |
| Materials Science | #79 | #56 | 8.1% | 6.5% | 248 | 622 |
| Mathematics | #66 | #72 | 16.7% | 5.7% | 258 | 250 |
| Medicine | #85 | #83 | 9.4% | 7.3% | 4.1k | 2.9k |
| Neuroscience | #61 | #50 | 8.5% | 7.9% | 204 | 255 |
| Physics and Astronomy | - | #60 | - | 6.3% | - | 359 |
| Psychology | #62 | #55 | 13.5% | 8.6% | 585 | 850 |
| Social Sciences | #84 | #77 | 12.7% | 8.0% | 1.6k | 3.6k |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Lebanon
- Sectarianism
- Civil War
- Sovereignty
- Refugees
- Complications
- Identity
- Governance
- Politics
- Depression
- Human Rights
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Pandemic
- Artificial Intelligence
- Environmental Impact
- Climate Change
- Treatment
- Quality of Life
- Sustainability
- Inflammation
- Machine Learning
- Epidemiology
- Deep Learning
- Mental Health
- COVID-19
- Renewable Energy
- Healthcare
- Globalization
- Public Health
- Supply Chain Management
- Diagnosis
- Risk Factors
- Internet of Things
- Economic Growth
- Energy Efficiency
- Chemotherapy
- Security
- Mortality
- Risk Management
- Infectious Diseases
- Lebanon
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology1,046▲ 1.56×136 topics
- Machine Learning685▲ 1.22×96 topics
- Deep Learning647◆ 1.12×82 topics
- Inflammation399◆ 1.12×83 topics
- Mental Health382▲ 1.59×46 topics
- Sustainability364◆ 0.89×102 topics
- COVID-19350▲ 1.60×29 topics
- Quality of Life349▲ 1.44×58 topics
- Renewable Energy336▲ 1.38×52 topics
- Treatment335▲ 1.64×52 topics
- Healthcare332▲ 1.73×36 topics
- Climate Change324▼ 0.71×106 topics
- Globalization312◆ 0.94×123 topics
- Environmental Impact300◆ 1.05×63 topics
- Public Health284▲ 1.16×66 topics
- Artificial Intelligence273◆ 1.14×59 topics
- Supply Chain Management268▲ 1.77×24 topics
- Pandemic264▲ 1.59×12 topics
- Diagnosis264▲ 1.68×41 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease253▲ 1.32×39 topics
- Risk Factors245▲ 1.32×37 topics
- Human Rights227▲ 1.32×67 topics
- Internet of Things222▲ 1.55×30 topics
- Depression218▲ 1.47×25 topics
- Economic Growth214▲ 1.56×31 topics
- Politics213▲ 4.8×19 topics
- Energy Efficiency208▲ 1.34×38 topics
- Governance206▲ 3.8×18 topics
- Chemotherapy198▲ 1.66×24 topics
- Identity197▲ 1.62×53 topics
- Security189▲ 1.68×30 topics
- Complications188▲ 2.2×17 topics
- Mortality181▲ 1.90×13 topics
- Refugees168▲ 8.1×9 topics
- Risk Management160▲ 2.0×17 topics
- Sovereignty152▲ 10×10 topics
- Infectious Diseases143▲ 2.6×9 topics
- Civil War139▲ 27×2 topics
- Lebanon129▲ 72×1 topic
- Sectarianism129▲ 72×1 topic
Lithuania
- National Stereotypes
- Social Perception
- Australia
- Cold War
- Eastern Europe
- Social Competence
- Soviet Union
- Entrepreneurship
- Ethics
- International Relations
- Identity
- Economic Growth
- Energy Efficiency
- Higher Education
- Artificial Intelligence
- Innovation
- Human Rights
- Sustainable Development
- Education
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Epidemiology
- Globalization
- Environmental Impact
- Renewable Energy
- Mental Health
- Pedagogy
- Leadership
- Environmental Management
- European Union
- Literature
- Learning
- Professional Identity
- Digital Competence
- Feminist Research
- European Integration
- Diplomacy
- Postcolonial Theory
- Rhetoric
- Imagology
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability824▲ 1.45×121 topics
- Climate Change727◆ 1.15×118 topics
- Epidemiology724▼ 0.78×135 topics
- Education679▲ 1.70×124 topics
- Globalization673▲ 1.47×156 topics
- Sustainable Development616▲ 1.70×98 topics
- Environmental Impact523▲ 1.32×70 topics
- Human Rights478▲ 2.0×81 topics
- Renewable Energy472▲ 1.40×55 topics
- Innovation454▲ 1.89×74 topics
- Mental Health415▲ 1.25×46 topics
- Artificial Intelligence405▲ 1.22×63 topics
- Pedagogy400▲ 3.4×30 topics
- Higher Education392▲ 3.2×32 topics
- Leadership360▲ 3.2×35 topics
- Energy Efficiency334▲ 1.56×43 topics
- Environmental Management326▲ 3.5×19 topics
- Economic Growth325▲ 1.72×34 topics
- European Union302▲ 5.8×27 topics
- Identity292▲ 1.73×72 topics
- Literature263▲ 2.1×51 topics
- International Relations262▲ 4.7×28 topics
- Learning248▲ 3.6×14 topics
- Ethics247▲ 2.1×50 topics
- Professional Identity240▲ 12×5 topics
- Entrepreneurship232▲ 2.5×22 topics
- Digital Competence226▲ 11×3 topics
- Soviet Union217▲ 17×3 topics
- Feminist Research215▲ 165×1 topic
- Social Competence215▲ 165×1 topic
- European Integration209▲ 16×6 topics
- Eastern Europe202▲ 17×3 topics
- Diplomacy177▲ 8.2×8 topics
- Cold War168▲ 12×5 topics
- Postcolonial Theory156▲ 26×4 topics
- Australia155▲ 42×1 topic
- Rhetoric151▲ 6.4×6 topics
- Social Perception142▲ 15×5 topics
- Imagology132▲ 57×1 topic
- National Stereotypes132▲ 57×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Lithuania has out-published Lebanon every year since 1986, when it overtook it.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5000
- 1In the top 1,0000
- #46Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Lebanon or Lithuania?
Lithuania publishes 1.4× as much research as Lebanon in 2022-now (20k against 15k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Lebanon or Lithuania?
11.8% of Lebanon's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 8.4% for Lithuania.
Is Lebanon or Lithuania growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +17% against 2018-21 for Lebanon, and +6% for Lithuania.
Which has more open access research, Lebanon or Lithuania?
65% of Lithuania's research is free to read, against 44% of Lebanon's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Lebanon or Lithuania?
Lebanon holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Lithuania 0; in the top 1,000 it is 1 against 0.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Lebanon
- 1Lebanese American University24.6% top 10% · 2.3k works
- 2American University of Beirut10.8% top 10% · 3.2k works
- 3Holy Spirit University of Kaslik17.8% top 10% · 509 works
- 4Saint Joseph University8.7% top 10% · 1k works
- 5Lebanese University7.6% top 10% · 1.9k works
- 6Lebanese International University12.2% top 10% · 432 works
Lithuania
- 1Vytautas Magnus University9.8% top 10% · 1.7k works
- 2Vilnius University7.0% top 10% · 5.1k works
- 3Kaunas University of Technology11.3% top 10% · 2.1k works
- 4Vilnius Gediminas Technical University9.2% top 10% · 2.1k works
- 5Mykolas Romeris University8.3% top 10% · 635 works
- 6Klaipėda University7.7% top 10% · 550 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Lebanon
- 1 Elie I. Bouri #152 worldwide 29k citations · 467 works
- 2 Elie Georges Karam #15,821 worldwide 35k citations · 290 works
- 3 John Fayyad #72,447 worldwide 11k citations · 65 works
- 4 Omar S. Itani #72,719 worldwide 3.3k citations · 113 works
- 5 Aimée Karam #73,746 worldwide 12k citations · 75 works
Lithuania
- 1 Morteza Ghobakhloo #2,585 worldwide 15k citations · 136 works
- 2 Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas #8,332 worldwide 56k citations · 838 works
- 3 Dalia Štreimikienė #21,194 worldwide 25k citations · 825 works
- 4 Jelena Čelutkienė #36,225 worldwide 49k citations · 275 works
- 5 Tomas Baležentis #51,809 worldwide 12k citations · 422 works