Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Falls Church · United States

Capital Meeting Planning

cmpinc.netROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#19,476
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#4,040
of 7,310
Research works
247
▲ 159% vs 2018-21
Citations
4k
16.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
6.4%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.92×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
16%
world 40%
International
8%
world 18%
Capital Meeting Planning

Which fields of science does Capital Meeting Planning work in?

In 2022-now, 42% of research at Capital Meeting Planning is in Health Sciences, 25% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (39%), Computer Science (14%), Social Sciences (12%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 11 fractional works · 42.5% of its workMedicine: 10 fractional works · 39.0% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 5.2% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workEmergency Medicine: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth Informatics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workFamily Practice: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 6 fractional works · 25.4% of its workComputer Science: 4 fractional works · 13.9% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 2 fractional works · 9.3% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 7.8% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 6 fractional works · 22.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 11.8% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workDevelopment: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 5.9% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 4.7% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 9.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 6.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workBiophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKCapital MeetingPlanning26fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences9%Physical Sciences25%Health Sciences42%Social Sciences23%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 17 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine1039.0%
    2. Health Professions13.5%
    1. Computer Science413.9%
    2. Engineering27.8%
    3. Chemistry01.3%
    4. Physics and Astronomy01.3%
    5. Materials Science00.7%
    6. Environmental Science00.4%
    1. Social Sciences311.8%
    2. Psychology25.9%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance13.9%
    4. Decision Sciences00.9%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting00.3%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology26.6%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences12.2%
    3. Neuroscience00.4%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.46× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.23× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.18× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.83× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 1.79× its world share, 4 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.52× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 0.59× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 1.33× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.03× its world share, 10 worksMedicineBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.90× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.83× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.93× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.93× its world share, 3 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Medicine, 2.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 17 fields, with their numbers
  1. Medicine2.03×10 works
  2. Psychology1.93×2 works
  3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.83×1 works
  4. Computer Science1.79×4 works
  5. Health Professions1.33×1 works
  6. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.23×2 works
  7. Social Sciences0.93×3 works
  8. Decision Sciences0.90×0 works
  9. Chemistry0.83×0 works
  10. Physics and Astronomy0.59×0 works
  11. Engineering0.52×2 works
  12. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.46×1 works
  13. Neuroscience0.27×0 works
  14. Materials Science0.19×0 works
  15. Immunology and Microbiology0.18×0 works
  16. Business, Management and Accounting0.10×0 works
  17. Environmental Science0.09×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Capital Meeting Planning?

Ranked on the quality score, Nathan Banks, Neil M. Swan and Linda W. Helgerson lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Capital Meeting Planning.

  1. 1 Nathan Banks United States · #2,088,603 worldwide 3.1k citations · 358 works
  2. 2 Neil M. Swan United States · #4,234,140 worldwide 208 citations · 69 works
  3. 3 Linda W. Helgerson United States · #4,645,186 worldwide 36 citations · 18 works
  4. 4 David Alpher United States · #4,702,373 worldwide 3 citations · 31 works
  5. 5 Iwao Sugai United States · #5,875,406 worldwide 119 citations · 39 works
All ranked researchers at Capital Meeting Planning

What are the most cited papers from Capital Meeting Planning?

The most cited paper from Capital Meeting Planning is "Accelerometer Use in Physical Activity: Best Practices and Research Recommendations" (Dianne Stanton Ward, Kelly R. Evenson, Amber Vaughn et al., 2005), with 785 citations. Next come "Ziprasidone 80 mg/day and 160 mg/day in the Acute Exacerbation of Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder A 6-Week Placebo-Controlled Trial" (381) and "Which Is Better, an Ensemble of Positive–Negative Pairs or a Centered Spherical Simplex Ensemble?" (232).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Accelerometer Use in Physical Activity: Best Practices and Research Recommendations Dianne Stanton Ward, Kelly R. Evenson, Amber Vaughn et al. · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Nov 2005 785
2 Ziprasidone 80 mg/day and 160 mg/day in the Acute Exacerbation of Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder A 6-Week Placebo-Controlled Trial David Gordon Daniel · Neuropsychopharmacology May 1999 381
3 Which Is Better, an Ensemble of Positive–Negative Pairs or a Centered Spherical Simplex Ensemble? Xuguang Wang, Craig H. Bishop, Simon Julier · Monthly Weather Review Open access Jul 2004 232
4 Field investigation of the relationship among adult curiosity, workplace learning, and job performance Thomas G. Reio, Albert K. Wiswell · Human Resource Development Quarterly 2000 210
5 USEEIO: A new and transparent United States environmentally-extended input-output model Yi Yang, Wesley W. Ingwersen, Troy R. Hawkins et al. · Journal of Cleaner Production Open access 29 Apr 2017 185
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Capital Meeting Planning?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Deep Learning, Machine Learning, Crisis Resolution, Home Treatment, Economic Growth, Cardiovascular Disease and Oxidative Stress.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 8 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 8 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology2▲ 2.1×15 topics
  2. Deep Learning2▲ 2.3×14 topics
  3. Machine Learning2▲ 2.3×13 topics
  4. Cardiovascular Disease1▲ 3.6×6 topics
  5. Crisis Resolution1▲ 297×1 topic
  6. Economic Growth1▲ 4.8×4 topics
  7. Home Treatment1▲ 297×1 topic
  8. Oxidative Stress1▲ 2.4×4 topics

Which research topics does Capital Meeting Planning publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Psychiatric care and mental health services, Global trade and economics, Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment and Folate and B Vitamins Research.

Psychiatric care and men…1Psychiatric care and mental health services: 1 fractional worksGlobal trade and economics: 0 fractional worksLiver Disease Diagnosis …0Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment: 0 fractional worksFolate and B Vitamins Re…0Folate and B Vitamins Research: 0 fractional worksAluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals: 0 fractional worksInternational Development and Aid: 0 fractional worksInflammatory Bowel Disease0Inflammatory Bowel Disease: 0 fractional worksCaribbean history, culture, and politics: 0 fractional worksHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics: 0 fractional worksReligious Education and Schools: 0 fractional works
Clinical PsychologyGeneral Economics, Econometrics and FinanceEpidemiologyRheumatology6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Psychiatric care and mental health services Clinical Psychology 1 works
  2. 2 Global trade and economics General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0 works
  3. 3 Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Epidemiology 0 works
  4. 4 Folate and B Vitamins Research Rheumatology 0 works
  5. 5 Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals Plant Science 0 works
  6. 6 International Development and Aid Development 0 works
  7. 7 Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics 0 works
  8. 8 Caribbean history, culture, and politics Cultural Studies 0 works
  9. 9 Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics Political Science and International Relations 0 works
  10. 10 Religious Education and Schools Education 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available16.5%not open83.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors7.7%domestic only92.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Capital Meeting Planning's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 159% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Capital Meeting Planning as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00013% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Capital Meeting Planning0.00020% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Capital Meeting Planning over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Falls Church

All research institutions in Falls Church

Share Capital Meeting Planning's ranking

Capital Meeting Planning on Science Explorer

A card with Capital Meeting Planning's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Capital Meeting Planning. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.