Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Greensboro · United States

Center for Creative Leadership

In research, Center for Creative Leadership stands highest in Social Sciences (#5,419 of 14,833 worldwide), over all time.

ccl.org/Leadership/index.aspxROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#18,845
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#3,912
of 7,310
Research works
416
▼ 40% vs 2018-21
Citations
15k
36.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
17.5%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.02×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
13%
world 40%
International
8%
world 18%
Center for Creative Leadership

What is Center for Creative Leadership known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #5,419 of 14,833 11.0%360

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Center for Creative Leadership sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Center for Creative Leadership work in?

In 2022-now, 74% of research at Center for Creative Leadership is in Social Sciences, 12% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (31%), Psychology (22%), Business, Management and Accounting (17%). It does 2.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 16 fractional works · 74.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 7 fractional works · 31.1% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 7.6% of its workCommunication: 2 fractional works · 7.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 6.6% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 5.6% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 5 fractional works · 21.8% of its workClinical Psychology: 2 fractional works · 10.2% of its workSocial Psychology: 2 fractional works · 7.0% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 4 fractional works · 16.8% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 3 fractional works · 12.3% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 3 fractional works · 12.0% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 7.3% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 2 fractional works · 6.9% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 11.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 4.8% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workComputer Science Applications: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKCenter forCreative…22fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences11%Health Sciences12%Social Sciences74%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 15 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences731.1%
    2. Psychology521.8%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting416.8%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance12.8%
    5. Decision Sciences01.7%
    1. Health Professions27.3%
    2. Medicine14.4%
    3. Nursing00.2%
    1. Environmental Science14.8%
    2. Computer Science14.0%
    3. Engineering01.2%
    4. Mathematics00.8%
    5. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.5%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology02.3%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.42× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Computer Science: 0.52× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.31× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.96× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.64× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 2.77× its world share, 2 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.23× its world share, 1 worksMedicineNursing: 0.44× its world share, 0 worksNursingBusiness, Management and Accounting: 5.23× its world share, 4 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.71× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.29× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 7.17× its world share, 5 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.46× its world share, 7 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 7.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 15 fields, with their numbers
  1. Psychology7.17×5 works
  2. Business, Management and Accounting5.23×4 works
  3. Health Professions2.77×2 works
  4. Social Sciences2.46×7 works
  5. Decision Sciences1.71×0 works
  6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.29×1 works
  7. Environmental Science0.96×1 works
  8. Mathematics0.64×0 works
  9. Computer Science0.52×1 works
  10. Nursing0.44×0 works
  11. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.42×0 works
  12. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.31×0 works
  13. Medicine0.23×1 works
  14. Engineering0.08×0 works
  15. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.06×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Center for Creative Leadership?

Ranked on the quality score, Kristin L. Cullen, Marian N. Ruderman and Cynthia D. McCauley lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Center for Creative Leadership.

  1. 1 Kristin L. Cullen United States · #385,191 worldwide 2.1k citations · 86 works
  2. 2 Marian N. Ruderman United States · #496,732 worldwide 5.4k citations · 95 works
  3. 3 Cynthia D. McCauley United States · #579,827 worldwide 4.7k citations · 95 works
  4. 4 Jennifer J. Deal United States · #741,390 worldwide 1.6k citations · 57 works
  5. 5 Patricia J. Ohlott United States · #788,416 worldwide 2.7k citations · 33 works
  6. 6 William A. Gentry United States · #812,623 worldwide 4.2k citations · 128 works
  7. 7 Phillip W. Braddy United States · #876,615 worldwide 3.8k citations · 54 works
  8. 8 John W. Fleenor United States · #926,784 worldwide 4.2k citations · 89 works
  9. 9 Ellen Van Velsor United States · #962,469 worldwide 3.7k citations · 41 works
  10. 10 Jean Brittain Leslie United States · #1,434,827 worldwide 1.1k citations · 50 works
All ranked researchers at Center for Creative Leadership

What are the most cited papers from Center for Creative Leadership?

The most cited paper from Center for Creative Leadership is "Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance." (Adam W. Meade, Emily Cooper Johnson, Phillip W. Braddy, 2008), with 1,692 citations. Next come "Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory" (1,272) and "Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis: A Powerful Approach for Examining Moderation and Overcoming Limitations of Difference Scores" (988).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Adam W. Meade, Emily Cooper Johnson, Phillip W. Braddy · Journal of Applied Psychology May 2008 1,692
2 Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory David V. Day, John W. Fleenor, LEANNE E. ATWATER et al. · The Leadership Quarterly Open access 25 Nov 2013 1,272
3 Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis: A Powerful Approach for Examining Moderation and Overcoming Limitations of Difference Scores Linda Rhoades Shanock, Benjamin E. Baran, William A. Gentry et al. · Journal of Business and Psychology 5 Jun 2010 988
4 The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior Sheldon Alexander, Marian N. Ruderman · Social Justice Research Jun 1987 906
5 Women and minorities in management. Ann M. Morrison, Mary Ann Von Glinow · American Psychologist 1990 877
All 59 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Center for Creative Leadership?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Leadership, Job Satisfaction, Mental Health, Organizational Performance, Social Media, Organizational Behavior, Work Engagement and Resilience.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 14 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 14 words, with their numbers
  1. Leadership5▲ 43×6 topics
  2. Job Satisfaction2▲ 26×3 topics
  3. Mental Health2▲ 7.8×6 topics
  4. Organizational Performance2▲ 39×4 topics
  5. Social Media2▲ 6.2×5 topics
  6. Organizational Behavior2▲ 47×1 topic
  7. Work Engagement2▲ 77×1 topic
  8. Resilience2▲ 14×3 topics
  9. Bereavement1▲ 180×1 topic
  10. Complicated Grief1▲ 180×1 topic
  11. Board Diversity1▲ 162×1 topic
  12. Gender Diversity1▲ 162×1 topic
  13. Health1▲ 14×3 topics
  14. Employee Engagement1▲ 28×3 topics

Which research topics does Center for Creative Leadership publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health, Gender Diversity and Inequality and Human Resource and Talent Management.

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior: 2 fractional worksGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health: 1 fractional worksGender Diversity and Inequality: 1 fractional worksHuman Resource and Talent Management: 1 fractional worksWork-Family Balance Challenges: 1 fractional worksEmotional Intelligence and Performance: 1 fractional worksCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts: 1 fractional worksDigital Media and Philosophy: 0 fractional worksRadio, Podcasts, and Digital Media: 0 fractional worksPublic Relations and Crisis Communication: 0 fractional works
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementClinical PsychologyGender StudiesSociology and Political Science4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2 works
  2. 2 Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 1 works
  3. 3 Gender Diversity and Inequality Gender Studies 1 works
  4. 4 Human Resource and Talent Management Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1 works
  5. 5 Work-Family Balance Challenges Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  6. 6 Emotional Intelligence and Performance Social Psychology 1 works
  7. 7 COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts Economics and Econometrics 1 works
  8. 8 Digital Media and Philosophy Computer Science Applications 0 works
  9. 9 Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media Communication 0 works
  10. 10 Public Relations and Crisis Communication Communication 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available13.2%not open86.8%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors7.6%domestic only92.4%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Center for Creative Leadership's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 40% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Center for Creative Leadership as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000086% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Center for Creative Leadership0.000075% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Center for Creative Leadership over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Greensboro

All research institutions in Greensboro

Share Center for Creative Leadership's ranking

Center for Creative Leadership on Science Explorer

A card with Center for Creative Leadership's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Center for Creative Leadership. Posts are plain text and can be reported.