Foundation for Professional Development
In research, Foundation for Professional Development stands highest in Social Sciences (#11,856 of 16,945 worldwide), Social Sciences (#7,886 of 10,206 worldwide) and Education (#2,771 of 3,044 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #24,662 of 28,054 · #32,582 all time
- Rank in South Africa
- #78 of 87
- Research works
- 822 ▼ 32% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 2.6k 3.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 17% world 28%
What is Foundation for Professional Development known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #11,856 of 16,945 | 6.9% | 540 | |
| Social SciencesField | #7,886 of 10,206 | 5.6% | 355 | |
| EducationSubfield | #2,771 of 3,044 | 3.8% | 248 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #21,306 of 21,541 | 3.3% | 132 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Foundation for Professional Development sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 3.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 3.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 2.9×
- Psychology 2.8×
- Nursing 2.2×
- Social Sciences 1.7×
- Medicine 1.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.6×
- Dentistry 1.5×
- Arts and Humanities 1.2×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.6×
- Environmental Science 0.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
- Decision Sciences 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Foundation for Professional Development?
Ranked on the composite score, Mingyuan Zhang, Andrew Medina‐Marino and Mark Deschaine lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Foundation for Professional Development.
- 1 Mingyuan Zhang South Africa · #256,686 worldwide 131 citations · 34 works
- 2 Andrew Medina‐Marino South Africa · #703,674 worldwide 39 citations · 17 works
- 3 Mark Deschaine South Africa · #782,785 worldwide 12 citations · 20 works
- 4 Krystyna Nowak‐Fabrykowski South Africa · #908,304 worldwide 11 citations · 22 works
- 5 Scott Roberts South Africa · #1,019,524 worldwide 7 citations · 20 works
- 6 Troy Wayne Hicks South Africa · #1,234,709 worldwide 12 citations · 47 works
- 7 James Tarleton McDonald South Africa · #1,252,147 worldwide 2 citations · 17 works
- 8 Scotty Lamar Roberts South Africa · #1,275,621 worldwide 0 citations · 20 works
- 9 Eyal Lederman South Africa · #1,389,390 worldwide 4 citations · 17 works
- 10 Raymond W Francis South Africa · #1,419,765 worldwide 1 citations · 34 works
Which keywords describe research at Foundation for Professional Development?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Higher Education, Educational Technology, Pedagogy, HIV Transmission, Online Learning, Digital Transformation, Vocational Education and E-Learning.
- Teacher Education
- Inflammatory Diseases
- Digital Competence
- Adolescent Health
- Training Pathways
- Multilingualism
- Elderly
- Stigma and Discrimination
- Student Perceptions
- Workplace Learning
- Professional Development
- Antiretroviral Therapy
- Reflective Practice
- Student Engagement
- Teacher Training
- Education
- Risk Factors
- Online Learning
- E-Learning
- Educational Technology
- Epidemiology
- Higher Education
- Mental Health
- Pedagogy
- HIV Transmission
- Digital Transformation
- COVID-19
- Vocational Education
- Treatment
- Leadership
- Vaccine
- Primary Care
- Preexposure Prophylaxis
- Distance Learning
- Language Policy
- Student Retention
- Wound Healing
- Social Determinants of Health
- Distance Education
- Sexually Transmitted Infections
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology5▲ 1.82×25 topics
- Educational Technology4▲ 5.4×9 topics
- Higher Education4▲ 10×5 topics
- E-Learning3▲ 4.7×5 topics
- Mental Health3▲ 3.1×12 topics
- Online Learning3▲ 5.5×6 topics
- Pedagogy3▲ 9.5×5 topics
- Risk Factors3▲ 4.3×8 topics
- HIV Transmission3▲ 59×2 topics
- Education3▲ 2.4×8 topics
- Digital Transformation3▲ 7.4×5 topics
- Teacher Training3▲ 6.2×6 topics
- COVID-192▲ 2.8×9 topics
- Student Engagement2▲ 9.1×5 topics
- Vocational Education2▲ 42×2 topics
- Reflective Practice2▲ 19×4 topics
- Treatment2▲ 2.8×8 topics
- Antiretroviral Therapy2▲ 19×5 topics
- Leadership2▲ 6.2×3 topics
- Professional Development2▲ 15×5 topics
- Vaccine2▲ 6.8×6 topics
- Workplace Learning2▲ 130×2 topics
- Primary Care2▲ 6.6×5 topics
- Student Perceptions2▲ 14×2 topics
- Preexposure Prophylaxis2▲ 50×1 topic
- Stigma and Discrimination2▲ 50×1 topic
- Distance Learning2▲ 6.5×3 topics
- Elderly2▲ 9.0×3 topics
- Language Policy2▲ 16×2 topics
- Multilingualism2▲ 13×2 topics
- Student Retention2▲ 57×1 topic
- Training Pathways2▲ 83×1 topic
- Wound Healing2▲ 8.4×4 topics
- Adolescent Health1▲ 24×2 topics
- Social Determinants of Health1▲ 9.0×2 topics
- Digital Competence1▲ 23×1 topic
- Distance Education1▲ 9.6×1 topic
- Inflammatory Diseases1▲ 11×2 topics
- Sexually Transmitted Infections1▲ 40×2 topics
- Teacher Education1▲ 16×2 topics
Which research topics does Foundation for Professional Development publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions, Education Systems and Policy, Foreign Language Teaching Methods and Reproductive tract infections research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions Infectious Diseases 2 works
- 2 Education Systems and Policy Education 2 works
- 3 Foreign Language Teaching Methods Education 1 works
- 4 Reproductive tract infections research Microbiology 1 works
- 5 Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health General Health Professions 1 works
- 6 Educational Innovations and Challenges Information Systems 1 works
- 7 Mentoring and Academic Development Social Psychology 1 works
- 8 COVID-19 diagnosis using AI Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1 works
- 9 Glaucoma and retinal disorders Ophthalmology 1 works
- 10 Reflective Practices in Education Education 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Foundation for Professional Development's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 32% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Pretoria
- University of Pretoria
- University of South Africa
- Tshwane University of Technology
- Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
- Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University
- Human Sciences Research Council
- Agricultural Research Council of South Africa
- South African National Biodiversity Institute
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.