Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Alexandria · United States

Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne

duchennemd.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
52
▲ 32% vs 2018-21
Citations
289
5.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
6.7%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
64%
world 40%
International
41%
world 18%
Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne

Not ranked overall: Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne work in?

In all years, 39% of research at Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne is in Physical Sciences, 30% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (17%), Engineering (15%), Computer Science (10%). It does 1.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 20 fractional works · 39.1% of its workEngineering: 8 fractional works · 14.6% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 2 fractional works · 3.4% of its workComputational Mechanics: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workAerospace Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workMechanics of Materials: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 5 fractional works · 9.9% of its workInformation Systems: 3 fractional works · 6.6% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 5.9% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Science: 2 fractional works · 3.9% of its workElectronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGeneral Materials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workNuclear and High Energy Physics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workRadiation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workAtmospheric Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSpace and Planetary Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 15 fractional works · 29.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 5 fractional works · 9.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 3.6% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workLaw: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 4 fractional works · 7.9% of its workConservation: 2 fractional works · 3.2% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workHistory: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 3 fractional works · 5.0% of its workFinance: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 3.2% of its workManagement Information Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 10 fractional works · 19.2% of its workMedicine: 9 fractional works · 17.4% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 2 fractional works · 4.0% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 6 fractional works · 12.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 4 fractional works · 8.6% of its workPlant Science: 2 fractional works · 4.1% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workInsect Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSoil Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workForestry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 3.1% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKFoundation ToEradicate…52fractional works, all years
Life Sciences12%Physical Sciences39%Health Sciences19%Social Sciences30%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 20 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering814.6%
    2. Computer Science59.9%
    3. Environmental Science35.9%
    4. Materials Science23.9%
    5. Physics and Astronomy12.5%
    6. Chemistry11.3%
    7. Earth and Planetary Sciences11.0%
    1. Social Sciences59.4%
    2. Arts and Humanities47.9%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance35.0%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting23.2%
    5. Decision Sciences12.8%
    6. Psychology11.3%
    1. Medicine917.4%
    2. Nursing01.0%
    3. Health Professions00.8%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences48.6%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology23.1%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology00.3%
    4. Neuroscience00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1.23× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Chemistry: 1.06× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 2.79× its world share, 4 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.35× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.41× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.64× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceHealth Professions: 0.44× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.20× its world share, 5 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 5.50× its world share, 3 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.53× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 6.57× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.37× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.61× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 6.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 15 fields, with their numbers
  1. Decision Sciences6.57×1 works
  2. Arts and Humanities5.50×3 works
  3. Computer Science2.79×4 works
  4. Business, Management and Accounting1.53×1 works
  5. Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.23×1 works
  6. Medicine1.20×5 works
  7. Chemistry1.06×0 works
  8. Materials Science0.64×0 works
  9. Social Sciences0.61×2 works
  10. Health Professions0.44×0 works
  11. Engineering0.41×1 works
  12. Psychology0.37×0 works
  13. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.35×0 works
  14. Environmental Science0.25×0 works
  15. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.20×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne?

Ranked on the quality score, Vlad Sagalovych lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne.

  1. 1 Vlad Sagalovych United States · #2,744,928 worldwide 46 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne

What are the most cited papers from Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne?

The most cited paper from Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne is "A New Distribution System Reconfiguration Approach Using Optimum Power Flow and Sensitivity Analysis for Loss Reduction" (Felipe V. Gomes, Sarah Alves Carneiro, J.L.R. Pereira et al., 2006), with 204 citations. Next come "INFLUENCE OF GLUTAMINE ON CYTOKINE PRODUCTION BY HUMAN GUT IN VITRO" (141) and "Anti-thymocyte globulins in kidney transplantation: focus on current indications and long-term immunological side effects" (72).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 A New Distribution System Reconfiguration Approach Using Optimum Power Flow and Sensitivity Analysis for Loss Reduction Felipe V. Gomes, Sarah Alves Carneiro, J.L.R. Pereira et al. · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 30 Oct 2006 204
2 INFLUENCE OF GLUTAMINE ON CYTOKINE PRODUCTION BY HUMAN GUT IN VITRO Moı̈se Coëffier, Olga Miralles-Barrachina, Florence Le Pessot et al. · Cytokine Feb 2001 141
3 Anti-thymocyte globulins in kidney transplantation: focus on current indications and long-term immunological side effects Jamal Bamoulid, Oliver Staeck, Thomas Crépin et al. · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Open access 25 Oct 2016 72
4 Adding Mindfulness to CBT Programs for Binge Eating: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Hannah Woolhouse, Ann D. Knowles, Naomi A. Crafti · Eating Disorders 15 Jun 2012 60
5 Effects of exercise- and pacing-induced tachycardia on coronary collateral flow in the awake dog. John M. Fedor, Judith C. Rembert, Deirdre McIntosh et al. · Circulation Research Open access Feb 1980 37
All 80 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Digital Repositories, Data Sharing, Scientific Data Management, Metadata Standards, Thin Films, Archives, Digital Preservation and Public Health.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 30 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 30 words, with their numbers
  1. Digital Repositories3▲ 207×2 topics
  2. Data Sharing2▲ 224×1 topic
  3. Scientific Data Management2▲ 288×1 topic
  4. Public Health2▲ 2.8×5 topics
  5. Climate Change2▲ 1.35×11 topics
  6. Epidemiology2▼ 0.81×11 topics
  7. Metadata Standards2▲ 117×2 topics
  8. Thin Films2▲ 12×2 topics
  9. Cardiovascular Disease2▲ 2.7×4 topics
  10. Archives2▲ 221×1 topic
  11. Digital Preservation2▲ 191×1 topic
  12. Risk Factors1▲ 2.6×6 topics
  13. Education1▲ 1.92×7 topics
  14. Sustainability1▲ 1.45×5 topics
  15. Hypertension1▲ 6.7×3 topics
  16. Mechanical Properties1▲ 2.4×2 topics
  17. Biodiversity1▲ 2.7×5 topics
  18. Diabetes Mellitus1▲ 9.4×2 topics
  19. Metabolic Syndrome1▲ 2.4×4 topics
  20. Workflow Management1▲ 21×2 topics
  21. Capital Flows1▲ 36×1 topic
  22. Financial Integration1▲ 43×1 topic
  23. Global Change1▲ 6.3×2 topics
  24. Heart Failure1▲ 4.3×3 topics
  25. Innovation1▲ 2.2×5 topics
  26. Low-k Dielectrics1▲ 79×1 topic
  27. Microelectronics1▲ 71×1 topic
  28. Remote Sensing1▲ 1.75×4 topics
  29. Social Network Analysis1▲ 15×2 topics
  30. Text Mining1▲ 23×2 topics

Which research topics does Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Research Data Management Practices, Digital and Traditional Archives Management, Digital Humanities and Scholarship and Scientific Computing and Data Management.

Research Data Management…2Research Data Management Practices: 2 fractional worksDigital and Traditional Archives Management: 2 fractional worksDigital Humanities and Scholarship: 1 fractional worksScientific Computing and Data Management: 1 fractional worksHeart rate and cardiovascular health: 1 fractional worksOptics and Image Analysis1Optics and Image Analysis: 1 fractional worksEducational Environments and Student Outcomes: 0 fractional worksSustainability, Governance, and Employment Studies: 0 fractional worksHealthcare Systems and Public Health: 0 fractional worksLibrary Science and Information Systems: 0 fractional works
Information SystemsConservationLiterature and Literary TheoryInformation Systems and Management5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 2 works
  2. 2 Digital and Traditional Archives Management Conservation 2 works
  3. 3 Digital Humanities and Scholarship Literature and Literary Theory 1 works
  4. 4 Scientific Computing and Data Management Information Systems and Management 1 works
  5. 5 Heart rate and cardiovascular health Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
  6. 6 Optics and Image Analysis Management Information Systems 1 works
  7. 7 Educational Environments and Student Outcomes Education 0 works
  8. 8 Sustainability, Governance, and Employment Studies Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  9. 9 Healthcare Systems and Public Health Epidemiology 0 works
  10. 10 Library Science and Information Systems Information Systems 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available63.6%not open36.4%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors40.7%domestic only59.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 32% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000043% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne0.000092% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Alexandria

All research institutions in Alexandria

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.