Standard Bio (Norway)
In research, Standard Bio (Norway) stands highest in Physical Sciences (#15,171 of 17,446 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #19,392 of 22,385 · #20,473 all time
- Rank in Norway
- #108 of 123
- Research works
- 436 ▲ 176% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 4.2k 9.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 6.5% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.90× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 43% world 40%
- International
- 50% world 18%
What is Standard Bio (Norway) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #15,171 of 17,446 | 7.0% | 182 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Standard Bio (Norway) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Standard Bio (Norway) work in?
In 2022-now, 28% of research at Standard Bio (Norway) is in Physical Sciences, 27% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (20%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (17%), Engineering (14%). It does 1.9× the world's share of Life Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Physical Sciences4327.8%
- Engineering2114.0%
- Computer Science85.1%
- Materials Science42.4%
- Environmental Science42.4%
- Chemistry32.1%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences10.6%
- Physics and Astronomy10.5%
- Energy10.4%
- Chemical Engineering00.2%
- Mathematics00.1%
- Life Sciences4227.1%
- Health Sciences3824.5%
- Medicine3019.7%
- Health Professions64.0%
- Nursing10.4%
- Veterinary00.2%
- Dentistry00.2%
- Social Sciences3220.6%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Immunology and Microbiology, 3.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Immunology and Microbiology3.45×5 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology3.24×26 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.86×2 works
- Health Professions1.52×6 works
- Chemistry1.36×3 works
- Veterinary1.33×0 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.08×5 works
- Neuroscience1.07×3 works
- Medicine1.02×30 works
- Psychology1.00×5 works
- Engineering0.93×22 works
- Social Sciences0.90×17 works
- Nursing0.88×1 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.77×6 works
- Decision Sciences0.75×1 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.74×2 works
- Materials Science0.70×4 works
- Computer Science0.66×8 works
- Chemical Engineering0.63×0 works
- Environmental Science0.47×4 works
- Energy0.39×1 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.36×1 works
- Dentistry0.31×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.21×1 works
- Arts and Humanities0.13×1 works
- Mathematics0.12×0 works
- Immunology and Microbiology 3.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3.2×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.9×
- Health Professions 1.5×
- Chemistry 1.4×
- Veterinary 1.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.1×
- Neuroscience 1.1×
- Medicine 1.0×
- Psychology 1.0×
- Engineering 0.9×
- Social Sciences 0.9×
- Nursing 0.9×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.8×
- Decision Sciences 0.8×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.7×
- Materials Science 0.7×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Chemical Engineering 0.6×
- Environmental Science 0.5×
- Energy 0.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.4×
- Dentistry 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Arts and Humanities 0.1×
- Mathematics 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Standard Bio (Norway)?
Ranked on the quality score, Lawford H. Fry, Joel Edward Patterson and Carl Heck lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Standard Bio (Norway).
- 1
Lawford H. Fry
Norway · #3,230,996 worldwide 9 citations · 37 works
- 2
Joel Edward Patterson
Norway · #3,345,895 worldwide 8 citations · 26 works
- 3
Carl Heck
Norway · #3,543,767 worldwide 134 citations · 28 works
- 4
Charles T. Main
Norway · #3,760,228 worldwide 4 citations · 15 works
- 5
Hans Reiner
Norway · #4,386,453 worldwide 99 citations · 78 works
- 6
Timothy de Rosen
Norway · #4,601,991 worldwide 3 citations · 70 works
- 7
Nikesh Parsotam
Norway · #4,661,923 worldwide 9 citations · 21 works
- 8
AIVO Research Intelligence Platform
Norway · #5,071,357 worldwide 0 citations · 63 works
- 9
Matthew Mckew
Norway · #7,424,938 worldwide 27 citations · 93 works
Which keywords describe research at Standard Bio (Norway)?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Gene Expression, Data Integration, Big Data, Single-Cell, Transcriptomics and Discrimination.
- Tumor Regression
- Robotic Process Automation
- Disability
- Cancer Immunotherapy
- Well-being
- Tumor Microenvironment
- Biomechanics
- High-Throughput Analysis
- Bioimage Analysis
- Firefighters
- Occupational Exposure
- Cancer Risk
- Injuries
- Algorithmic Bias
- Discrimination
- Sustainability
- Transcriptomics
- Data Integration
- Big Data
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Gene Expression
- Deep Learning
- Single-Cell
- Epidemiology
- Ethics
- Surveillance
- Fairness
- Physical Fitness
- Image Processing
- Emergency Responders
- Microscopy
- High-Content Screening
- Protein Microarrays
- Medical Imaging
- Challenges
- Automation
- Business Process
- Injury Prevention
- Corporate Social Responsibility
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Machine Learning15▲ 3.0×21 topics
- Artificial Intelligence13▲ 5.9×12 topics
- Gene Expression9▲ 9.8×8 topics
- Big Data9▲ 6.2×8 topics
- Deep Learning9▲ 1.71×27 topics
- Data Integration8▲ 31×3 topics
- Single-Cell8▲ 101×1 topic
- Transcriptomics8▲ 101×1 topic
- Epidemiology7◆ 1.14×30 topics
- Sustainability7▲ 1.75×15 topics
- Ethics6▲ 7.6×3 topics
- Discrimination6▲ 18×2 topics
- Surveillance6▲ 13×2 topics
- Algorithmic Bias6▲ 42×1 topic
- Fairness6▲ 35×1 topic
- Injuries5▲ 113×2 topics
- Physical Fitness5▲ 24×2 topics
- Cancer Risk5▲ 14×4 topics
- Image Processing5▲ 7.0×6 topics
- Occupational Exposure4▲ 51×2 topics
- Emergency Responders4▲ 158×1 topic
- Firefighters4▲ 158×1 topic
- Microscopy4▲ 39×2 topics
- Bioimage Analysis4▲ 69×1 topic
- High-Content Screening4▲ 69×1 topic
- High-Throughput Analysis4▲ 72×1 topic
- Protein Microarrays4▲ 147×1 topic
- Biomechanics4▲ 8.0×6 topics
- Medical Imaging3▲ 4.2×6 topics
- Tumor Microenvironment3▲ 5.0×3 topics
- Challenges3▲ 17×2 topics
- Well-being3▲ 4.9×7 topics
- Automation3▲ 25×2 topics
- Cancer Immunotherapy3▲ 12×2 topics
- Business Process3▲ 242×1 topic
- Disability3▲ 16×2 topics
- Injury Prevention3▲ 14×2 topics
- Robotic Process Automation3▲ 242×1 topic
- Corporate Social Responsibility2▲ 9.7×2 topics
- Tumor Regression2▲ 15×2 topics
Which research topics does Standard Bio (Norway) publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Occupational Health and Performance and Cell Image Analysis Techniques.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics Molecular Biology 8 works
- 2 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 6 works
- 3 Occupational Health and Performance Occupational Therapy 4 works
- 4 Cell Image Analysis Techniques Biophysics 4 works
- 5 Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications Molecular Biology 4 works
- 6 Robotic Process Automation Applications Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 3 works
- 7 Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Oncology 2 works
- 8 Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 9 CAR-T cell therapy research Oncology 2 works
- 10 Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management Social Psychology 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Standard Bio (Norway)'s research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 176% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Standard Bio (Norway) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00048% in 2024.
Fractional works of Standard Bio (Norway) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Oslo
- University of Oslo
- OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health
- Norwegian Cancer Society
- BI Norwegian Business School
- Norwegian Defence Research Establishment
- Norsk Hydro (Norway)
- The Research Council of Norway
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Standard Bio (Norway). Posts are plain text and can be reported.
